Cited by 60Pancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Exenatide-Induced Acute Pancreatitis

Ayoub, Walaa A., Kumar, Ashok A., Naguib, Hossam S., Taylor, Harris C.·2010·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective To report acute pancreatitis in a patient with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) receiving exenatide and critically review previous reports. Methods We describe clinical and laboratory data of a woman with probable exenatide-induced pancreatitis and apply the same criteria to previously published cases. Results A 64-year-old, nonalcoholic woman with NIDDM presented with a 1-month history of epigastric pain beginning 2 days after starting exenatide. Serum lipase concentration was 2700 U/L (reference range, 114-320 U/L), and serum amylase concentration was 131 U/L (reference range, 30-110 U/L). Liver function test results, lipid profile, and serum creatinine concentration were normal. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed changes consistent with pancreatitis, and the gallbladder was absent. Exenatide was discontinued. Conservative therapy resulted in rapid resolution of symptoms, normal lipase concentration (151 U/L), and normal findings from CT of the pancreas 90 days later. The US Food and Drug Administration has reported 36 cases of presumed pancreatitis associated with exenatide. However, none of the selection criteria were specified, two-thirds of the patients did not have CT, and 90% had at least 1 other risk factor for acute pancreatitis. A single published case report of exenatide-induced pancreatitis contains no description of the pancreas on abdominal CT, does not mention alcohol use, and does not report normal lipase values. Conclusions This is the most thoroughly documented example of probable exenatide-induced pancreatitis. In any diabetic patient with acute pancreatitis, exenatide must be ruled out as the cause and its use discontinued.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4158/ep09104.crr

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ayoub, W. A., Kumar, A. A., Naguib, H. S., & Taylor, H. C.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Ayoub, Walaa A.
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
80-83
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998922126
Cited by
58
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
exenatide, acute pancreatitis, drug-induced pancreatitis, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, serum lipase, abdominal CT, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Exenatide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Middle Aged, Pancreatitis, Peptides, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Venoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review