Cited by 17Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among asian females is lower using the new 2013 world health organization diagnostic criteria

Yew, Tong Wei, Khoo, Chin Meng, Thai, Ah Chuan, Kale, Anita Sugam, Yong, Eu Leong, Tai, E. Shyong·2014·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective To determine the impact of the new 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis on GDM prevalence and pregnancy outcomes in Asian ethnic groups compared to the 1999 WHO criteria. Methods A retrospective cohort study included 855 pregnant females of Chinese, Malay, and Asian Indian ethnicity at high risk of GDM who underwent 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) between July 2008 and June 2010 in a tertiary center in Singapore. GDM prevalence, reclassification, and pregnancy outcomes were determined using the 2013 and 1999 diagnostic cutoffs for fasting and 2-hour postglucose (PG) values. Results The prevalence of GDM was reduced from 28.8% to 21.1% when the 2013 criteria were used. Overall, 10.2% subjects were reclassified from GDM to normal using the 2013 criteria, and 2.6% were reclassified from normal to GDM, giving a net reclassification rate of 12.8%. Reclassification from GDM to normal was greatest among Chinese, followed by Asian Indians, but the prevalence rate was unchanged among Malays. Babies of mothers who were reclassified from normal to GDM were more likely to have birth weight >95th centile and shoulder dystocia. Conclusion The prevalence of GDM was reduced when the 2013 criteria were used, with the greatest reduction seen among Chinese, followed by Asian Indians. Lowering the fasting cutoff as per the new criteria identified a select group of patients who might benefit from GDM treatment. However, raising the 2-hour PG cutoff would miss a significant number of patients who might potentially benefit from GDM treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4158/ep14028.or

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WHO diagnostic criteria established in 2013 include the 75-g, two-hour OGTT test; new guidelines for detecting GDM lower the total prevalence of the disease in Singapore.

    “The WHO diagnostic criteria were established in 2013. They include the 75-g, two-hour OGTT test. The new guidelines for detecting GDM lower the total prevalence of the disease in Singapore [231].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yew, T. W., Khoo, C. M., Thai, A. C., Kale, A. S., Yong, E. L., & Tai, E. S.
Affiliations
  • National University Health System (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Yew, Tong Wei
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
1064-1069
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070077214
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM prevalence, Asian ethnic groups, Chinese, Malay language, Asian Indians, 75 g oral glucose tolerance test, fasting blood glucose, birth weight, shoulder dystocia, pregnancy outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review