The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jasanoff, S. (2003) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127030333004 · Cited by 398
Self-citationPublic engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology
Delgado, A., Lein Kjølberg, K., & Wickson, F. (2011) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662510363054 · Cited by 284
Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for agroecology
Montenegro de Wit, M., & Iles, A. (2016) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000115 · Cited by 91
Chan, N. K. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819837736 · Cited by 64
The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in the English Courtroom
Golan, T. (1999) · Science in Context · doi:10.1017/s026988970000329x · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Jasanoff, S.
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 1995-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4207052576
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4159/9780674039124
- The paper
- Jasanoff, S. (1995). Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. Harvard University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
