Cited by 41Study and Philosophy of ReligionEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Meaning of Belief: Religion from an Atheist’s Point of View

Crane, Tim·2017·Harvard University Press eBooks

Abstract

Current debate about religion seems to be going nowhere. Atheists persist with their arguments, many plausible and some unanswerable, but they make no impact on believers. Defenders of religion find atheists equally unwilling to cede ground. Noting that religion is not what atheists think it is, Tim Crane offers a way out of this stalemate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/9780674982727

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Crane, T.
Corresponding author
Crane, Tim
Venue
Harvard University Press eBooks
Published
2017-12-31
OpenAlex
W3207544814
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.04
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
belief, religion, atheism, philosophy of religion, religious beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review