The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Catching Babies: The Professionalization of Childbirth, 18701920
Abstract
Childbirth is a quintessential family event that simultaneously holds great promise and runs the risk of danger. By the late nineteenth century, the birthing room had become a place where the goals of the new scientific professional could be demonstrated, but where traditional female knowledge was in conflict with the new ways. Here the choice of attendants and their practices defined gender, ethnicity, class, and the role of the professional. Using the methodology of social science theory, particularly quantitative statistical analysis and historical demography, Charlotte Borst examines the effect of gender, culture, and class on the transition to physician-attended childbirth. Earlier studies have focused on physician opposition to midwifery, devoting little attention to the training for and actual practice of midwifery. As a result, until now we knew little about the actual conditions of the midwife's education and practice. Catching Babies is the first study to examine the move to physician-attended birth within the context of a particular community. It focuses on four representative counties in Wisconsin to study both midwives and physicians within the context of their community. Borst finds that midwives were not pushed out of practice by elitist or misogynist obstetricians. Instead, their traditional, artisanal skills ceased to be valued by a society that had come to embrace the model of disinterested, professional science. The community that had previously hired midwi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“enforcement of midwifery laws was by many accounts much stricter in urban areas (Borst 1995, 55-60; Molina 2006, 105).”
From Occupational Licensing and Maternal Health: Evidence from Early Midwifery Laws (2020) · cites this paper as Borst 1995, 55-60
In the citing paper
“During the first decades of the twentieth century, untrained midwives typically attended one or two births per year (Borst 1995, 54-58; Barney 2000, 62-65).”
From Occupational Licensing and Maternal Health: Evidence from Early Midwifery Laws (2020) · cites this paper as Borst 1995
In the citing paper
“Moreover, this relationship was strongest in urban areas, a result that is consistent with anecdotal evidence that enforcement of midwifery laws was less strict in the countryside and small towns (Borst 1995, 55-60; Molina 2006, 105).”
From Occupational Licensing and Maternal Health: Evidence from Early Midwifery Laws (2020) · cites this paper as Borst 1995
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Occupational Licensing and Maternal Health: Evidence from Early Midwifery Laws
Anderson, D. M., Brown, R., Charles, K. K., & Rees, D. I. (2020) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/710555 · Cited by 98
Sears, C. A., & Godderis, R. (2010) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2010.521626 · Cited by 48
Challenging Medicine: Law, Resistance, and the Cultural Politics of Childbirth
Beckett, K., & Hoffman, B. (2005) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/j.0023-9216.2005.00079.x · Cited by 48
Origins of Nurse‐Midwifery in the United States and its Expansion in the 1940s
Dawley, K. (2003) · Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health · doi:10.1016/s1526-9523(03)00002-3 · Cited by 45
Held, L., & Rutherford, A. (2011) · History of Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026219 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Borst, C. G.
- Corresponding author
- Borst, Charlotte G.
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 1995-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2325848300
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Keywords
- midwifery, midwifery education, history of obstetrics, Wisconsin, 19th century, childbirth practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catching Babies: The Professionalization of Childbirth, 18701920. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4159/harvard.9780674733480
- The paper
- Borst, C. G. (1995). Catching Babies: The Professionalization of Childbirth, 18701920. Harvard University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674733480