The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NBR1 co-operates with p62 in selective autophagy of ubiquitinated targets
Open accessAbstract
Selective degradation of intracellular targets, such as misfolded proteins and damaged organelles, is an important homeostatic function that autophagy has acquired in addition to its more general role in restoring the nutrient balance during stress and starvation. Although the exact mechanism underlying selection of autophagic substrates is not known, ubiquitination is a candidate signal for autophagic degradation of misfolded and aggregated proteins. p62/SQSTM1 was the first protein shown to bind both target-associated ubiquitin (Ub) and LC3 conjugated to the phagophore membrane, thereby effectively acting as an autophagic receptor for ubiquitinated targets. Importantly, p62 not only mediates selective degradation but also promotes aggregation of ubiquitinated proteins that can be harmful in some cell types. Is p62 the only autophagic receptor for selective autophagy? Looking for proteins that interact with ATG8 family proteins, we identified NBR1 (neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1) as an additional LC3- and Ub-binding protein. NBR1 is degraded by autophagy depending on its LC3-interacting region (LIR) but does not strictly require p62 for this process. Like p62, NBR1 accumulates and aggregates when autophagy is inhibited and is a part of pathological inclusions. We propose that NBR1 together with p62 promotes autophagic degradation of ubiquitinated targets and simultaneously regulates their aggregation when autophagy becomes limited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Overview of Autophagy: Morphology, Mechanism, and Regulation
Parzych, K. R., & Klionsky, D. J. (2014) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5371 · Cited by 2,521
Regulation of Mammalian Autophagy in Physiology and Pathophysiology
Ravikumar, B., Sarkar, S., Davies, J. E., Futter, M., Garcia-Arencibia, M., Green-Thompson, Z. W., Jimenez-Sanchez, M., Korolchuk, V. I., Lichtenberg, M., Luo, S., et al. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00030.2009 · Cited by 1,727
Autophagy, mitochondria and oxidative stress: cross-talk and redox signalling.
Lee, J., Giordano, S., & Zhang, J. (2012) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20111451 · Cited by 1,438
Islet Amyloid Polypeptide, Islet Amyloid, and Diabetes Mellitus
Westermark, P., Andersson, A., & Westermark, G. T. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2009 · Cited by 1,044
Thurston, T. L. M., Ryzhakov, G., Bloor, S., von Muhlinen, N., & Randow, F. (2009) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.1800 · Cited by 869
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkin, V., Lamark, T., Johansen, T., & Dikic, I.
- Venue
- Autophagy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 732-733
- ISSN
- 1554-8627 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-8635
- OpenAlex
- W2021996063
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NBR1 co-operates with p62 in selective autophagy of ubiquitinated targets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/auto.5.5.8566
- The paper
- Kirkin, V., Lamark, T., Johansen, T., & Dikic, I. (2009). NBR1 co-operates with p62 in selective autophagy of ubiquitinated targets. Autophagy. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.5.5.8566
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.