The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How do real tumors become resistant to cisplatin?
Open accessAbstract
Lab research on cultured tumor cells selected for resistance to platinum compounds has turned up a diverse array of resistance mechanisms. In contrast, we recently found that mouse mammary tumors containing irrepairable null alleles of the Brca1 gene do not become resistant to cisplatin ever, although they invariably become resistant to a variety of other anti-cancer drugs. Each new treatment with cisplatin shrinks the tumor to a very small remnant, but relapse always occurs. The BRCA1 missing in these mouse tumors is essential for the homology-directed DNA repair (HR) that allows error-free repair of the duplex breaks caused by the excision of platin-DNA adducts. The mouse tumor results therefore raise the question whether the cisplatin resistance mechanisms identified in vitro can actually overcome an irreversible defect in DNA repair in real tumors. This question is underlined by recent analyses of tumor samples of patients with ovarian cancer that have uncovered a new platin resistance mechanism: these tumors were initially sensitive to platin through a defect in the BRCA2 gene, also required for HR, like BRCA1. Resistance in these patients,-after an initial response of the tumor,-was due to secondary mutations in the defective BRCA2 gene, restoring BRCA2 function.(1,2) These clinical observations show the overriding importance of a functional HR system for tumor cells to survive platin-induced DNA lesions. Taken together with the mouse mammary tumor data, these observations raise the possibility that proliferating cells have no readily available mechanism to escape from cisplatin DNA damage once their HR is irreversibly inactivated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rottenberg, S., Jaspers, J. E., Kersbergen, A., van der Burg, E., Nygren, A. O. H., Zander, S. A. L., Derksen, P. W. B., de Bruin, M., Zevenhoven, J., Lau, A., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806092105 · Cited by 956
Self-citationHomologous Recombination Deficiency: Exploiting the Fundamental Vulnerability of Ovarian Cancer
Konstantinopoulos, P. A., Ceccaldi, R., Shapiro, G. I., & D'Andrea, A. D. (2015) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0714 · Cited by 945
Selective killing of ATM- or p53-deficient cancer cells through inhibition of ATR
Reaper, P. M., Griffiths, M. R., Long, J. M., Charrier, J.-D., MacCormick, S., Charlton, P. A., Golec, J. M. C., & Pollard, J. R. (2011) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.573 · Cited by 633
Recent developments in ruthenium anticancer drugs
Levina, A., Mitra, A., & Lay, P. A. (2009) · Metallomics · doi:10.1039/b904071d · Cited by 592
Planells‐Cases, R., Lutter, D., Guyader, C., Gerhards, N. M., Ullrich, F., Elger, D. A., Kucukosmanoglu, A., Xu, G., Voss, F. K., Reincke, S. M., et al. (2015) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201592409 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Borst, P., Rottenberg, S., & Jonkers, J.
- Venue
- Cell Cycle
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-05-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1353-1359
- ISSN
- 1538-4101 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-4005
- OpenAlex
- W2051808614
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How do real tumors become resistant to cisplatin? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/cc.7.10.5930
- The paper
- Borst, P., Rottenberg, S., & Jonkers, J. (2008). How do real tumors become resistant to cisplatin? Cell Cycle. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.10.5930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.