Cited by 73Heat shock proteins researchUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Structure and Dynamics

HSP90: The Rosetta stone for cellular protein dynamics?

Open access
DeZwaan, Diane C., Freeman, Brian C.·2008·Cell Cycle

Abstract

The Hsp90 proteomic network is expansive and includes a variety of cell processes operating within the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm. Though the functional significance of the extensive interactions has not been defined, we suggest that the Hsp90 molecular chaperone machinery promotes dynamic behaviors for client proteins that is critical to achieve homeostasis. A general rapid action by cell factors would permit both proper assembly of biological complexes and efficient transitions between distinct structures. Here, we describe why the properties that are inherent to molecular chaperones place these proteins in a unique position to drive the dynamic cellular environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/cc.7.8.5723

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. Mitchison TJ. Self-organization of polymer-motor systems in the cytoskeleton. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1992; 336:99-106.
  2. Misteli T. Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. Science 2001; 291:843-47.
  3. Bubulya PA, Spector DL. "On the move"ments of nuclear components in living cells. Exp Cell Res 2004; 296:4-11.
  4. Trinkle Mulcahy L, Lamond AI. Toward a high-resolution view of nuclear dynamics. Science 2007; 318:1402-07.
  5. Ellis RJ. Macromolecular crowding: an important but neglected aspect of the intracellular environment. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2001; 11:114-9.
  6. Kushner DJ. Self-assembly of biological structures. Bacteriol Rev 1969; 33:302-45.
  7. Perham RN. Self-assembly of biological macromolecules. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1975; 272:123-36.
  8. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Roberts TH, Hirschberg K. Secretory protein trafficking and organ- elle dynamics in living cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2000; 16:557-89.
  9. Garel JR, Martel A, Muller K, Ikai A, Morishima N, Sutoh K. Role of subunit interactions in the self-assembly of oligomeric proteins. Adv Biophys 1984; 18:91-113.
  10. Minton AP. How can biochemical reactions within cells differ from those in test tubes? J Cell Sci 2006; 119:2863-9.
  11. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, Grandi P, Marzioch M, Bauer A, Schultz J, Rick JM, Mihon AM, Cruciat CM, et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002; 415:141-7.
  12. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, Zhong G, Guo X, Ignatchenko A, Li J, Pu S, Datta N, Tikuisis AP, et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevi- siae. Nature 2006; 440:637-43.
  13. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K, Howson RW, Belle A, Dephoure N, O'Shea EK, Weissman JS. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 2003; 425:737-41.
  14. Hendrick JP, Hartl FU. Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 1993; 62:349-84.
  15. Freeman BC, Yamamoto KR. Continuous recycling: a mechanism for modulatory signal transduction. Trends Biochem Sci 2001; 26:285-90.
  16. Wegele H, Muller L, Buchner J. Hsp70 and Hsp90-a relay team for protein folding. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 2004; 151:1-44.
  17. Richter K, Hendershot LM, Freeman BC. The cellular world according to Hsp90. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:90-4.
  18. Liang P, MacRae TH. Molecular chaperones and the cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 1997; 110:1431-40.
  19. Konieczny I, Zylicz M. Role of bacterial chaperones in DNA replication. Genet Eng (NY) 1999; 21:95-111.
  20. Morimoto RI. Dynamic remodeling of transcription complexes by molecular chaperones. Cell 2002; 110:281-84.
  21. Young JC, Barral JM, Hartl FU. More than folding: localized functions of cytosolic chaper- ones. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28:541-7.
  22. Ellis RJ, van der Vies SM. Molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem 1991; 60:321-47.
  23. Lindquist S, Craig EA. The heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet 1988; 22:631-77.
  24. Mayer MP, Bukau B. Hsp70 chaperones: cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005; 62:670-84.
  25. Rüdiger S, Buchberger A, Bukau B. Interaction of Hsp70 chaperones with substrates. Nat Struct Biol 1997; 4:342-9.
  26. Ellis J. Proteins as molecular chaperones. Nature 1987; 328:378-79.
  27. Riggs DL, Cox MB, Cheung-Flynn J, Prapapanich V, Carrigan PE, Smith DF. Functional specificity of co-chaperone interactions with Hsp90 client proteins. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2004; 39:279-95.
  28. Pratt WB, Toft DO. Regulation of signaling protein function and trafficking by the hsp90/ hsp70-based chaperone machinery. Exp Biol Med 2003; 228:111-33.
  29. Zhao R, Davey M, Hsu YC, Kaplanek P, Tong A, Parsons AB, Krogan N, Cagney G, Mai D, Greenblatt J, Boone C, Emili A, Houry WA. Navigating the chaperone network: an inte- grative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the hsp90 chaperone. Cell 2005; 120:715-27.
  30. Millson SH, Truman AW, King V, Prodromou C, Pearl LH, Piper PW. A two-hybrid screen of the yeast proteome for Hsp90 interactors uncovers a novel Hsp90 chaperone require- ment in the activity of a stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase, Slt2p (Mpk1p). Eukaryot Cell 2005; 4:849-60.
  31. McClellan AJ, Xia Y, Deutschbauer AM, Davis RW, Gerstein M, Frydman J. Diverse cel- lular functions of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone uncovered using systems approaches. Cell 2007; 131:121-35.
  32. Freeman BC, Toft TO, Morimoto RI. Molecular chaperone machines: Chaperone activi- ties of the cyclophilin Cyp-40 and the steroid aporeceptor associated protein, p23. Science 1996; 274:1718-20.
  33. Bose S, Weikl T, Bügl H, Buchner J. Chaperone function of Hsp90-associated proteins. Science 1996; 274:1715-17.
  34. Picard D. Heat-shock protein 90, a chaperone for folding and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002; 59:1640-48.
  35. Sanchez ER, Toft DO, Schlesinger MJ, Pratt WB. Evidence that the 90-kDa phosphopro- tein associated with the untransformed L-cell glucocorticoid receptor is a murine heat shock protein. J Biol Chem 1985; 260:12398-401.
  36. Pratt WB. The role of heat shock proteins in regulating the function, folding, and traffick- ing of the glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:21455-8.
  37. Picard D. Intracellular dynamics of the Hsp90 co-chaperone p23 is dictated by Hsp90. Ex. Cell Res 2006; 312:198-204.
  38. Yochem J, Uchida H, Sunshine M, Saito H, Georgopoulos CP, Feiss M. Genetic analysis of two genes, dnaJ and dnaK, necessary for Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda DNA replication. Mol Gen Genet 1978; 164:9-14.
  39. Zylicz M, Ang D, Liberek K, Georgopoulos C. Initiation of lambda DNA replication with purified host-and bacteriophage-encoded proteins: the role of the dnaK, dnaJ and grpE heat shock proteins. EMBO J 1989; 8:1601-08.
  40. Ziemienowicz A, Konieczny I, Hübscher U. Calf thymus Hsc70 and Hsc40 can substitute for DnaK and DnaJ function in protein renaturation but not in bacteriophage DNA repli- cation. FEBS Lett 2001; 507:11-15.
  41. Morano KA. New tricks for an old dog: the evolving world of Hsp70. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007; 1113:1-14.
  42. Borkovich KA, Farrelly FW, Finkelstein DB, Taulien J, Lindquist S. Hsp82 is an essential protein that is required in higher concentrations for growth of cells at higher temperatures. Mol Cell Biol 1989; 9:3919-30.
  43. Freeman BC, Yamamoto KR. Disassembly of transcriptional regulatory complexes by molecular chaperones. Science 2002; 296:2232-35.
  44. McClintock B. The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zae mays. Genetics 1941; 26:234-82.
  45. Watson JD. Origin of concatemeric T7 DNA. Nat New Biol 1972; 239:197-201.
  46. Wellinger RJ, Wolf AJ, Zakian VA. Saccharomyces telomeres acquire single-strand TG1-3 tails late in S phase. Cell 1993; 72:51-60.
  47. Smogorzewska A, de Lange T. Regulation of telomerase by telomeric proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 2004; 73:177-208.
  48. Gilson E, Géli V. How telomeres are replicated. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:825-38.
  49. Holt SE, Aisner DL, Baur J, Tesmer VM, Dy M, Ouellette M, Trager JB, Morin GB, Toft DO, Shay JW, Wright WE, White MA. Functional requirement of p23 and Hsp90 in telomerase complexes. Genes and Dev 1999; 13:817-26.
  50. Grandin N, Charbonneau M. Hsp90 levels affect telomere length in yeast. Mol Genet Genomics 2001; 265:126-34.
  51. Virta Pearlman V, Morris DK, Lundblad V. Est1 has the properties of a single-stranded telomere end-binding protein. Genes Dev 1996; 10:3094-104.
  52. Hughes TR, Weilbaecher RG, Walterscheid M, Lundblad V. Identification of the single- strand telomeric DNA binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc13 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:6457-62.
  53. Gao H, Cervantes RB, Mandell EK, Otero JH, Lundblad V. RPA-like proteins mediate yeast telomere function. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:208-14.
  54. Grandin N, Reed SI, Charbonneau M. Stn1, a new Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein, is implicated in telomere size regulation in association with Cdc13. Genes Dev 1997; 11:512-27.
  55. Grandin N, Damon C, Charbonneau M. Ten1 functions in telomere end protection and length regulation in association with Stn1 and Cdc13. EMBO J 2001; 20:1173-83.
  56. Ghosal G, Muniyappa K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11 is a high-affinity G4 DNA- binding protein and a G-rich DNA-specific endonuclease: implications for replication of telomeric DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:4692-703.
  57. Nelson LD, Musso M, Van Dyke MW. The yeast STM1 gene encodes a purine motif triple helical DNA-binding protein. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:5573-81.
  58. Hayashi N, Murakami S. STM1, a gene which encodes a guanine quadruplex binding protein, interacts with CDC13 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Genet Genomics 2002; 267:806-13.
  59. Krauskopf A, Blackburn EH. Control of telomere growth by interactions of RAP1 with the most distal telomeric repeats. Nature 1996; 383:354-7.
  60. Houghtaling BR, Cuttonaro L, Chang W, Smith S. A dynamic molecular link between the telomere length regulator TRF1 and the chromosome end protector TRF2. Curr Biol 2004; 14:1621-31.
  61. Mattern KA, Swiggers SJ, Nigg AL, Lowenberg B, Houtsmuller AB, Zijlmans JM. Dynamics of protein binding to telomeres in living cells: implications for telomere structure and function. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:5587-94.
  62. Boulé JB, Vega LR, Zakian VA. The yeast Pif1p helicase removes telomerase from telomeric DNA. Nature 2005; 438:57-61.
  63. Toogun OA, Zeiger W, Freeman BC. The p23 molecular chaperone promotes func- tional telomerase complexes through DNA dissociation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:5765-70.
  64. Xia J, Peng Y, Mian IS, Lue NF. Identification of functionally important domains in the N-terminal region of telomerase reverse transcriptase. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:5196-207.
  65. Förstemann K, Lingner J. Telomerase limits the extent of base pairing between template RNA and telomeric DNA. EMBO Rep 2005; 6:361-6.
  66. Forsythe HL, Jarvis JL, Turner JW, Elmore LW, Holt SE. Stable association of hsp90 and p23, but not hsp70, with active human telomerase. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:15571-74.
  67. Keppler BR, Grady AT, Jarstfer MB. The biochemical role of the heat shock protein 90 chaperone complex in establishing human telomerase activity. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:19840-48.
  68. Toogun OA, DeZwaan DC, Freeman BC. The hsp90 molecular chaperone modulates multiple telomerase activities. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:457-67.
  69. Stavreva DA, Muller WG, Hager GL, Smith CL, McNally JG. Rapid glucocorticoid recep- tor exchange at a promoter is coupled to transcription and regulated by chaperones and proteasomes. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:2682-97.
  70. Elbi CC, Walker DA, Romero G, Sullivan WP, Toft DO, Hager GL, DeFranco DB. Molecular chaperones function as steroid receptor nuclear mobility factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:2876-81.
  71. Hager GL, Nagaich AK, Johnson TA, Walker DA, John S. Dynamics of nuclear receptor movement and transcription. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1677:46-51.
  72. Prigogine I, Nicolis G. Biological order, structure and instabilities. Q Rev Biophys 1971; 4:107-48.
  73. Levy EJ, McCarty J, Bukau B, Chirico WJ. Conserved ATPase and luciferase refolding activities between bacteria and yeast Hsp70 chaperones and modulators. FEBS Lett 1995; 368:435-40.
  74. Langer T, Lu C, Echols H, Flanagan J, Hayer MK, Hartl FU. Successive action of DnaK, DnaJ and GroEL along the pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding. Nature 1992; 356:683-9.
  75. Freeman BC, Morimoto RI. The human cytosolic molecular chaperones hsp90, hsp70 (hsc70) and hdj-1 have distinct roles in recognition of a non-native protein and protein refolding. EMBO J 1996; 15:2969-79.
  76. Dill KA, Chan HS. From Levinthal to Pathways to Funnels: The "New View" of Protein Folding Kinetics. Nat Struct Biol 1997; 4:10-19.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeZwaan, D. C., & Freeman, B. C.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Cell Cycle
Published
2008-04-15
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
1006-1012
ISSN
  • 1538-4101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-4005
OpenAlex
W1989391398
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Cycle (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK074270, DK074270)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
HSP90, molecular chaperones, client proteins, protein dynamics, chaperone-client interactions, proteostasis, protein complex formation, proteomic networks
MeSH terms
Homeostasis, Models, Biological, Telomere, Molecular Chaperones, HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins, Multiprotein Complexes, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review