Cited by 111Epigenetics and DNA MethylationChromosomal and Genetic VariationsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

DNA methylation: a source of random variation in natural populations

Open access
Massicotte, Rachel, Whitelaw, Emma, Angers, Bernard·2011·Epigenetics

Abstract

Epigenetic processes (e.g., DNA methylation) have been proposed as potentially important evolutionary mechanisms. However, before drawing conclusions about their evolutionary relevance, we need to evaluate the independence of epigenetic variation from genetic variation, as well as the extent of methylation polymorphism in nature. We evaluated these in natural populations of a clonal fish, Chrosomus eos-neogaeus, for which genetically identical individuals may be found in distinct environments. A genomic survey confirms the genetic uniformity of individuals, whereas a substantial level of inter-individual variation results in DNA methylation. Survey of the methylation status of the CpG dinucleotides of a fragment of a retrotransposon confirmed a marked difference in epiallelic composition among tissues, as well as among individuals. This study provides further evidence of epigenetic variation in the absence of genetic variation and demonstrates that this process can be a source of random variation in natural populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/epi.6.4.14532

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A disruption in epigenetic programming occurs across different time windows throughout the life span.

    “given evidence that a disruption in epigenetic programming occurs across different time windows throughout the life span (Massicotte, Whitelaw, & Angers, 2011).”

    From Can epigenetics shine a light on the biological pathways underlying major mental disorders? (2022) · cites this paper as Massicotte, Whitelaw, & Angers, 2011

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says environmental influences can alter methylation profiles beyond the standard developmental program, and the DNA methylation profiles section describes changes arising across cell divisions. These passages support epigenetic change, but they do not establish that disruptions occur in different time windows throughout the life span. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Epigenetic regulation occurs throughout the lifespan and can be induced by random changes or by multiple different environmental factors.

    “In fact, epigenetic regulation occurs throughout the lifespan and can be induced by random changes (62) or by multiple different environmental factors (63).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Salmon A, Ainouche ML, Wendel JF. Genetic and epigenetic consequences of recent hybridization and polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae). Mol Ecol 2005; 14:1163-75.
  2. Zhao XX, Chai Y, Liu B. Epigenetic inheritance and variation of DNA methylation level and pattern in maize intra-specific hybrids. Plant Sci 2007; 172:930-8.
  3. Binet MC, Angers B. Genetic identification of mem- bers of the Phoxinus eos-neogaeus hybrid complex. J Fish Biol 2005; 67:1169-77.
  4. Rakyan VK, Blewitt ME, Druker R, Preis JI, Whitelaw E. Metastable epialleles in mammals. Trends Genet 2002; 18:348-51.
  5. Sheldon CC, Conn AB, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. Different regulatory regions are required for the vernal- ization-induced repression of FLOWERING LOCUS C and for the epigenetic maintenance of repression. Plant Cell 2002; 14:2527-37.
  6. Feil R. Environmental and nutritional effects on the epigenetic regulation of genes. Mutat Res-Fund Mol M 2006; 600:46-57.
  7. Meaney MJ. Maternal care, gene expression and the transmission of individual differences in stress reac- tivity across generations. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001; 24:1161-92.
  8. Flanagan JM, Popendikyte V, Pozdniakovaite N, Sobolev M, Assadzadeh A, Schumacher A, et al. Intra- and interindividual epigenetic variation in human germ cells. Am J Hum Genet 2006; 79:67-84.
  9. Sollars V, Lu XY, Xiao L, Wang XY, Garfinkel MD, Ruden DM. Evidence for an epigenetic mechanism by which Hsp90 acts as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature Genet 2003; 33:70-4.
  10. Schlosser IJ, Doeringsfeld MR, Elder JF, Arzayus LF. Niche relationships of clonal and sexual fish in a het- erogeneous landscape. Ecology 1998; 79:953-68.
  11. Orkin S. Molecular cloning-A laboratory manual, 2 nd edition-Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Nature 1990; 343:604-5.
  12. Ashe A, Morgan DK, Whitelaw NC, Bruxner TJ, Vickaryous NK, Cox LL, et al. A genome-wide screen for modifiers of transgene variegation identifies genes with critical roles in development. Genome Biol 2008; 9:R182.
  13. O'Neill RJW, O'Neill MJ, Graves JAM. Undermethylation associated with retroelement activa- tion and chromosome remodelling in an interspecific mammalian hybrid. Nature 1998; 393:68-72.
  14. Dobrovic A, Bianco T, Tan LW, Sanders T, Hussey D. Screening for and analysis of methylation differences using methylation-sensitive single-strand conformation analysis. Methods 2002; 27:134-8.
  15. Kinoshita H, Shi Y, Sandefur C, Jarrard DF. Screening hypermethylated regions by methylation-sensitive single-strand conformational polymorphism. Anal Biochem 2000; 278:165-9.
  16. Meksem K, Ruben E, Hyten D, Triwitayakorn K, Lightfoot DA. Conversion of AFLP bands into high- throughput DNA markers. Mol Genet Genomics 2001; 265:207-14.
  17. Razin A, Riggs AD. DNA methylation and gene- function. Science 1980; 210:604-10.
  18. Richards EJ. Population epigenetics. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2008; 18:221-6.
  19. Angers B, Castonguay E, Massicotte R. Environmentally induced phenotypes and DNA methylation: how to deal with unpredictable conditions until the next gen- eration and after. Mol Ecol 2010; 19:1283-95.
  20. Pigliucci M. Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution 2007; 61:2743-9.
  21. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, Ropero S, Setien F, Ballestart ML, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:10604-9.
  22. Morgan HD, Sutherland HGE, Martin DIK, Whitelaw E. Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus in the mouse. Nat Genet 1999; 23:314-8.
  23. Sheldon CC, Burn JE, Perez PP, Metzger J, Edwards JA, Peacock WJ, et al. The FLF MADS box gene: A repres- sor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernaliza- tion and methylation. Plant Cell 1999; 11:445-58.
  24. Goddard KA, Dawley RM. Clonal inheritance of a dip- loid nuclear genome by a hybrid fresh-water minnow (Phoxinus eos-neogaeus, Pisces, Cyprinidae). Evolution 1990; 44:1052-65.
  25. Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9:465-76.
  26. Singh A, Negi MS, Moses VK, Venkateswarlu B, Srivastava PS, Lakshmikumaran M. Molecular analysis of micropropagated neem plants using aflp markers for ascertaining clonal fidelity. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 2002; 38:519-24.
  27. Gagnaire PA, Albert V, Jonsson B, Bernatchez L. Natural selection influences AFLP intraspecific genetic variability and introgression patterns in Atlantic eels. Mol Ecol 2009; 18:1678-91.
  28. Bird AP. CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature 1986; 321:209-13.
  29. Goodwin TJD, Poulter RTM. The DIRS1 group of retrotransposons. Mol Biol Evol 2001; 18:2067-82.
  30. Angers B, Schlosser IJ. The origin of Phoxinus eos-neo- gaeus unisexual hybrids. Mol Ecol 2007; 16:4562-71.
  31. Verhoeven KJF, Van Dijk PJ, Biere A. Changes in genomic methylation patterns during the formation of triploid asexual dandelion lineages. Mol Ecol 2010; 19:315-24.
  32. Cervera MT, Ruiz-Garcia L, Martinez-Zapater JM. Analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana based on methylation-sensitive AFLP markers. Mol Genet Genomics 2002; 268:543-52.
  33. Vandegehuchte MB, Lemiere F, Janssen CR. Quantitative DNA-methylation in Daphnia magna and effects of multigeneration Zn exposure. Comp Biochem Phys C 2009; 150:343-8. References
  34. Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev 2002; 16:6-21.
  35. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 2003; 33:245-54.
  36. Dolinoy DC, Huang D, Jirtle RL. Maternal nutri- ent supplementation counteracts bisphenol A-induced DNA hypomethylation in early development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:13056-61.
  37. Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D'Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7:847-54.
  38. Crews D, Gore AC, Hsu TS, Dangleben NL, Spinetta M, Schallert T, et al. Transgenerational epigenetic imprints on mate preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:5942-6.
  39. Kaminen-Ahola N, Ahola A, Maga M, Mallitt KA, Fahey P, Cox TC, et al. Maternal ethanol consumption alters the epigenotype and the phenotype of offspring in a mouse model. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:1000811.
  40. Verhoeven KJF, Jansen JJ, van Dijk PJ, Biere A. Stress- induced DNA methylation changes and their herita- bility in asexual dandelions. New Phytologist 2010; 185:1108-18.
  41. Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Maternal dietary methyl donor supplementation affects offspring phenotype by increasing cytosine methylation at the agouti locus in Avy mice. FASEB J 2002; 16:228.
  42. Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 1999; 401:157-61.
  43. Rakyan VK, Chong S, Champ ME, Cuthbert PC, Morgan HD, Luu KVK, et al. Transgenerational inheri- tance of epigenetic states at the murine Axin(Fu) allele occurs after maternal and paternal transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:2538-43.
  44. Chong SY, Whitelaw E. Epigenetic germline inheri- tance. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2004; 14:692-6.
  45. Blewitt ME, Vickaryous NK, Paldi A, Koseki H, Whitelaw E. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA meth- ylation at an epigenetically sensitive allele in mice. PLoS Genet 2006; 2:399-405.
  46. Jablonka E, Raz G. Transgenerational epigenetic inheri- tance: prevalence, mechnaisms and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 2009; 84:131-76.
  47. Kucharski R, Maleszka J, Foret S, Maleszka R. Nutritional control of reproductive status in honeybees via DNA methylation. Science 2008; 319:1827-30.
  48. Manning K, Tor M, Poole M, Hong Y, Thompson AJ, King GJ, et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic muta- tion in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nature Genet 2006; 38:948-52.
  49. Richards EJ. Opinion-Inherited epigenetic varia- tion-revisiting soft inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 2006; 7:395.
  50. Debat V, David P. Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol Evol 2001; 16:555-61.
  51. Boyes J, Bird A. DNA methylation inhibits transcrip- tion indirectly via a methyl-CpG binding-protein. Cell 1991; 64:1123-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massicotte, R., Whitelaw, E., & Angers, B.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Massicotte, Rachel
Venue
Epigenetics
Published
2011-04
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
421-427
ISSN
  • 1559-2294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2308
OpenAlex
W2077775555
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epigenetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
  • Université de Montréal
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
DNA methylation, epigenetic variation, epialleles, clonal fish, retrotransposons, CpG, interindividual variability, tissue-specific methylation, epigenetic inheritance, natural populations
MeSH terms
Animals, Cyprinidae, Female, Reproduction, Asexual, Genetic Variation, Genome, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review