The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charge variants in IgG1: Isolation, characterization, in vitro binding properties and pharmacokinetics in rats
Open accessAbstract
Antibody charge variants have gained considerable attention in the biotechnology industry due to their potential influence on stability and biological activity. Subtle differences in the relative proportions of charge variants are often observed during routine biomanufacture or process changes and pose a challenge to demonstrating product comparability. To gain further insights into the impact on biological activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of monoclonal antibody (mAb) charge heterogeneity, we isolated the major charge forms of a recombinant humanized IgG1 and compared their in vitro properties and in vivo PK. The mAb starting material had a pI range of 8.7-9.1 and was composed of about 20% acidic variants, 12% basic variants, and 68% main peak. Cation exchange displacement chromatography was used to isolate the acidic, basic, and main peak fractions for animal studies. Detailed analyses were performed on the isolated fractions to identify specific chemical modification contributing to the charge differences, and were also characterized for purity and in vitro potency prior to being administered either subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV) in rats. All isolated materials had similar potency and rat FcRn binding relative to the starting material. Following IV or SC administration (10 mg/kg) in rats, no difference in serum PK was observed, indicating that physiochemical modifications and pI differences among charge variants were not sufficient to result in PK changes. Thus, these results provided meaningful information for the comparative evaluation of charge-related heterogeneity of mAbs, and suggested that charge variants of IgGs do not affect the in vitro potency, FcRn binding affinity, or the PK properties in rats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age
Roopenian, D. C., & Akilesh, S. (2007) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2155 · Cited by 2,346
Charge density-dependent strength of hydration and biological structure
Collins, K. D. (1997) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(97)78647-8 · Cited by 1,334
Shields, R. L., Namenuk, A. K., Hong, K., Meng, Y. G., Rae, J., Briggs, J., Xie, D., Lai, J., Stadlen, A., Li, B., et al. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m009483200 · Cited by 1,161
Antibody Structure, Instability, and Formulation
Wang, W., Singh, S., Zeng, D. L., King, K., & Nema, S. (2007) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20727 · Cited by 941
Improving the efficacy of antibody-based cancer therapies
Carter, P. (2001) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/35101072 · Cited by 833
Microlymphatics and lymph flow
Schmid-Schonbein, G. W. (1990) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1990.70.4.987 · Cited by 613
Ober, R. J., Radu, C. G., Ghetie, V., & Ward, E. S. (2001) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/13.12.1551 · Cited by 501
Identification of multiple sources of charge heterogeneity in a recombinant antibody
Harris, R. J., Kabakoff, B., Macchi, F. D., Shen, F. J., Kwong, M., Andya, J. D., Shire, S. J., Bjork, N., Totpal, K., & Chen, A. B. (2001) · Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications · doi:10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00548-x · Cited by 500
Self-citationBoswell, C. A., Sun, X., Niu, W., Weisman, G. R., Wong, E. H., Rheingold, A. L., & Anderson, C. J. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm030383m · Cited by 483
Characterizing biological products and assessing comparability following manufacturing changes
Chirino, A. J., & Mire-Sluis, A. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1030 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies
Ryman, J. T., & Meibohm, B. (2017) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12224 · Cited by 802
Physicochemical Stability of Monoclonal Antibodies: A Review
Le Basle, Y., Chennell, P., Tokhadze, N., Astier, A., & Sautou, V. (2020) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2019.08.009 · Cited by 429
Effects of Charge on Antibody Tissue Distribution and Pharmacokinetics
Boswell, C. A., Tesar, D. B., Mukhyala, K., Theil, F.-P., Fielder, P. J., & Khawli, L. A. (2010) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc100261d · Cited by 398
Self-citationProgress in biopharmaceutical development
Kesik‐Brodacka, M. (2018) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.1617 · Cited by 353
Alt, N., Zhang, T. Y., Motchnik, P., Taticek, R., Quarmby, V., Schlothauer, T., Beck, H., Emrich, T., & Harris, R. J. (2016) · Biologicals · doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.06.005 · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Khawli, L. A., Goswami, S., Hutchinson, R., Kwong, Z. W., Yang, J., Wang, X., Yao, Z., Sreedhara, A., Cano, T., Tesar, D. B., Nijem, I., Allison, D. E., Wong, P. Y., Kao, Y.-H., Quan, C., Joshi, A., Harris, R. J., & Motchnik, P.
- Venue
- mAbs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 613-624
- ISSN
- 1942-0862 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-0870
- OpenAlex
- W1483007604
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charge variants in IgG1: Isolation, characterization, in vitro binding properties and pharmacokinetics in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/mabs.2.6.13333
- The paper
- Khawli, L. A., Goswami, S., Hutchinson, R., Kwong, Z. W., Yang, J., Wang, X., Yao, Z., Sreedhara, A., Cano, T., Tesar, D. B., Nijem, I., Allison, D. E., Wong, P. Y., Kao, Y.-H., Quan, C., Joshi, A., Harris, R. J., & Motchnik, P. (2010). Charge variants in IgG1: Isolation, characterization, in vitro binding properties and pharmacokinetics in rats. mAbs. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.2.6.13333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.