The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of proline under changing environments: A review
Open accessAbstract
When exposed to stressful conditions, plants accumulate an array of metabolites, particularly amino acids. Amino acids have traditionally been considered as precursors to and constituents of proteins, and play an important role in plant metabolism and development. A large body of data suggests a positive correlation between proline accumulation and plant stress. Proline, an amino acid, plays a highly beneficial role in plants exposed to various stress conditions. Besides acting as an excellent osmolyte, proline plays three major roles during stress, i.e., as a metal chelator, an antioxidative defense molecule and a signaling molecule. Review of the literature indicates that a stressful environment results in an overproduction of proline in plants which in turn imparts stress tolerance by maintaining cell turgor or osmotic balance; stabilizing membranes thereby preventing electrolyte leakage; and bringing concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within normal ranges, thus preventing oxidative burst in plants. Reports indicate enhanced stress tolerance when proline is supplied exogenously at low concentrations. However, some reports indicate toxic effects of proline when supplied exogenously at higher concentrations. In this article, we review and discuss the effects of exogenous proline on plants exposed to various abiotic stresses. Numerous examples of successful application of exogenous proline to improve stress tolerance are presented. The roles played by exogenous proline under varying environments have been critically examined and reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA damage and oxygen radical toxicity
Imlay, J. A., & Linn, S. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3287616 · Cited by 1,974
Cited by
Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies
Haider, F. U., Liqun, C., Coulter, J. A., Cheema, S. A., Wu, J., Zhang, R., Wenjun, M., & Farooq, M. (2021) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111887 · Cited by 1,541
Heavy Metal Stress and Some Mechanisms of Plant Defense Response
Emamverdian, A., Ding, Y., Mokhberdoran, F., & Xie, Y. (2015) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2015/756120 · Cited by 917
Abdel Latef, A. A. H., Srivastava, A. K., El‐sadek, M. S. A., Kordrostami, M., & Tran, L. P. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2780 · Cited by 365
MicroRNA156 improves drought stress tolerance in alfalfa ( Medicago sativa ) by silencing SPL13
Arshad, M., Feyissa, B. A., Amyot, L., Aung, B., & Hannoufa, A. (2017) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.01.018 · Cited by 267
Danouche, M., El Ghachtouli, N., & El Arroussi, H. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07609 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayat, S., Hayat, Q., Alyemeni, M. N., Wani, A. S., Pichtel, J., & Ahmad, A.
- Venue
- Plant Signaling & Behavior
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-09-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1456-1466
- ISSN
- 1559-2316 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-2324
- OpenAlex
- W2008951912
- Cited by
- 2,823
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of proline under changing environments: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/psb.21949
- The paper
- Hayat, S., Hayat, Q., Alyemeni, M. N., Wani, A. S., Pichtel, J., & Ahmad, A. (2012). Role of proline under changing environments: A review. Plant Signaling & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.