Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5,461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induced root-secreted phenolic compounds as a belowground plant defense

Open access
Lanoue, Arnaud, Burlat, Vincent, Schurr, Ulrich, Röse, Ursula S.R.·2010·Plant Signaling & Behavior

Abstract

Rhizosphere is the complex place of numerous interactions between plant roots, microbes and soil fauna. Whereas plant interactions with aboveground organisms are largely described, unravelling plant belowground interactions remains challenging. Plant root chemical communication can lead to positive interactions with nodulating bacteria, mycorriza or biocontrol agents or to negative interactions with pathogens or root herbivores. A recent study suggested that root exudates contribute to plant pathogen resistance via secretion of antimicrobial compounds. These findings point to the importance of plant root exudates as belowground signalling molecules, particularly in defence responses. In our report, we showed that under Fusarium attack the barley root system launched secretion of phenolic compounds with antimicrobial activity. The secretion of de novo biosynthesized t-cinnamic acid induced within 2 days illustrates the dynamic of plant defense mechanisms at the root level. We discuss the costs and benefits of induced defense responses in the rhizosphere. We suggest that plant defence through root exudation may be cultivar dependent and higher in wild or less domesticated varieties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/psb.5.8.12337

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bais HP, 2005, Nature, 434, 217, 10.1038/nature03356 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lanoue A, 2010, New Phytol, 185, 577, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03066.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bais HP, 2002, Plant Physiol Biochem, 40, 983, 10.1016/S0981-9428(02)01460-2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wurst S, 2010, Plant Soil, 329, 117, 10.1007/s11104-009-0139-2 · DOI
  5. Heil M, 2007, Induced resistance for plant defense, 157, 10.1002/9780470995983.ch9 · doi:10.1002/9780470995983.ch9
  6. Van Dam NM, 2001, Funct Ecol, 15, 406, 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2001.00533.x · DOI
  7. Ettema CH, 2002, Trends Ecol Evol, 17, 177, 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02496-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Van Der Putten WH, 2003, Ecology, 84, 2269, 10.1890/02-0284 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Scheu S, 2001, Basic Appl Ecol, 2, 3, 10.1078/1439-1791-00031 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Van Dam NM, 2009, Ann Rev Ecol Evol S, 40, 373, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120314 · DOI
  11. Taddei P, 2002, Biopolymers, 67, 428, 10.1002/bip.10170 · doi:10.1002/bip.10170
  12. Hamzehzarghani H, 2005, Physiol Mol Plant P, 66, 119, 10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.05.005 · doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.05.005

Cited by

See all 5,461

Metadata

Authors
Lanoue, A., Burlat, V., Schurr, U., & Röse, U. S. R.
Venue
Plant Signaling & Behavior
Published
2010-08
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
1037-1038
ISSN
  • 1559-2316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2324
OpenAlex
W2089051496
Cited by
5,461
References
1
FWCI
213.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induced root-secreted phenolic compounds as a belowground plant defense. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4161/psb.5.8.12337
The paper
Lanoue, A., Burlat, V., Schurr, U., & Röse, U. S. R. (2010). Induced root-secreted phenolic compounds as a belowground plant defense. Plant Signaling & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.5.8.12337

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.