Cited by 53Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsWastewater Treatment and Reuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formulation of Effective Microbial Consortia and its Application for Sewage Treatment

Open access
Monica, S, Karthik, L, Mythili, S, Sathiavelu, A·2011·Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology

Abstract

The present study was conducted for sewage treatment using effective microbial consortium.The Effective Microorganisms (EM) like Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, Aspergillus, Saccharomyces and Streptomyces were isolated from respective sources.The microbial consortium was formulated using molasses as medium at pH 3.8 and incubated at 37°C for 3 days.The sewage treatment was carried out with the addition of 3 ml/l EM solution under aerobic condition.The BOD, COD, TDS and TSS were reduced by 85%, 82%, 55%, and 91% respectively after 3 reduced the environmental impact.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4172/1948-5948.1000051

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]3. Ronald MA, Richard B (1981) Microbial Ecology Fundamental and application Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Sydney pp560.
  2. [4]4. Kurihara H (1990) Water quality of reusing waste water. Journal of Japan Sewage Works Association 27: 38-41
  3. [11]11. Higa T (1996) Effective Microorganisms -Their role in Kyusei Nature Farming and sustainable agriculture. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming. Washington, USA pp20-24. Volume 3(3): 051-055 (2011) -055
  4. [12]12. J Microbial Biochem Technol ISSN:1948-5948 JMBT, an open access journal

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Monica, S., Karthik, L., Mythili, S., & Sathiavelu, A.
Affiliations
Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Venue
Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology
Published
2011
Volume
03
Issue
03
ISSN
1948-5948 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323541328
Cited by
50
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
VIT University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
effective microorganisms, wastewater treatment, Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, Aspergillus, Saccharomyces, Streptomyces, BOD reduction, COD removal, aerobic bioremediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review