The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods to Estimate Above-Ground Biomass and Carbon Stock in Natural Forests - A Review
Open accessAbstract
Carbon exists as carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and constitutes about 0.04% of the atmosphere. In the recent past, it has gained a lot of attention as a greenhouse gas, as it has potential to influence the climate pattern of the world. Anthropogenic activities like industrialisation, deforestation, forest degradation and burning of fossil fuel, has caused an increase in the level of carbon in the atmosphere and disrupted the global carbon cycle. However, nature has its own mechanism of sequestering and storing the carbon in its “reservoirs” or “sinks’’. Forest plays an important role in the global carbon cycle as carbon sinks of the terrestrial ecosystem. The carbon sequestered or stored on the forest trees are mostly referred to as the biomass of the tree or forest. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change identified five carbon pools of the terrestrial ecosystem involving biomass, namely the aboveground biomass, below-ground biomass, litter, woody debris and soil organic matter. Among all the carbon pools, the above-ground biomass constitutes the major portion of the carbon pool. Estimating the amount of forest biomass is very crucial for monitoring and estimating the amount of carbon that is lost or emitted during deforestation, and it will also give us an idea of the forest’s potential to sequester and store carbon in the forest ecosystem. Estimations of forest carbon stocks are based upon the estimation of forest biomass. Forest’s carbon stocks are generally not measured directly; however, many authors assume the carbon concentration of tree parts to be 50% or 45% of the dry biomass. This paper, aims to review and summarise the various methods and studies that were carried out to estimate the above-ground biomass of the forest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests
Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D., Fölster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., et al. (2005) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x · Cited by 3,533
Springer Science+Business Media
Технология (2013) · Betascript Publishing eBooks · Cited by 3,087
Holdridge, L. R. (1967) · Cited by 2,264
The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997
Page, S. E., Siegert, F., Rieley, J. O., Boehm, H.-D. V., Jaya, A., & Limin, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01131 · Cited by 1,885
Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality
Gibbs, H. K., Brown, S., Niles, J. O., & Foley, J. A. (2007) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023 · Cited by 1,653
Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: A primer
Brown, S. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,320
Biomass Estimation Methods for Tropical Forests with Applications to Forest Inventory Data
Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J. R., & Lugo, A. E. (1989) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forestscience/35.4.881 · Cited by 1,279
Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance
Houghton, R. A. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00955.x · Cited by 1,273
The potential and challenge of remote sensing‐based biomass estimation
Lu, D. (2006) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160500486732 · Cited by 1,213
Ketterings, Q. M., Coe, R., van Noordwijk, M., Ambagau’, Y., & Palm, C. A. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00460-6 · Cited by 1,003
Metadata
- Authors
- T. Vashum, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography
- Publisher
- OMICS Publishing Group
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 02
- Issue
- 04
- ISSN
- 2157-7625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168273417
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods to Estimate Above-Ground Biomass and Carbon Stock in Natural Forests - A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4172/2157-7625.1000116
- The paper
- T. Vashum, K. (2012). Methods to Estimate Above-Ground Biomass and Carbon Stock in Natural Forests - A Review. Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7625.1000116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.