Cited by 7Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesHomelessness and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Geneva Model of Crisis Intervention: A Retrospective Study

Sentissi, Othman·2014·Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background: Brief therapy centers (BTCs) are outpatient mental health units based initially on a psychodynamic model of crisis intervention, and evolving later into a global care approach. The main objective of BTC is to provide mentally ill patients with a viable alternative to hospitalization. Methods: We undertook a retrospective study of 323 patients admitted to a BTC in Geneva in order to understand the evolution of our patients care over the changes in psychiatry over the last 2 decades. To this end, we considered predictive factors of relapse for 160 individuals with repeated “revolving door” admissions compared to 163 patients with a single admission to the BTC. To analyze data, we mainly use analysis of variance and logistic regression with SPSS software. Results: Living alone, lower socio-educational levels, unstable working conditions, crisis factor of professional trouble, and preexisting psychiatric conditions, such as depression, bipolar disorders, psychotic disorders or borderline personality disorder, that required multiple social and systemic interventions, and medical treatments (such as antipsychotics and mood stabilizers) increase probability that patients relapse and require multiple BTC admissions. Conclusions: The results of the present study that are considered as preliminary, support the development of ambulatory mental health units that attempt to adapt their intervention practices to different populations in order to prevent the revolving door phenomenon and therefore contribute to improve the global system of mental health.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4172/2161-0487.1000150

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of dropping out of treatment in psychiatric outpatients is highly variable and depends on the definition and time of drop out as well as the characteristics of the population sample and study design.

    “The rate of dropping out of treatment in psychiatric outpatients is highly variable and depends on the definition and time of drop out as well as the characteristics of the population sample and study design [1, 2].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sentissi, O.
Corresponding author
Sentissi, Othman
Venue
Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy
Published
2014
Volume
04
Issue
04
ISSN
2161-0487 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151635710
Cited by
7
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
crisis intervention, psychodynamic psychotherapy, recurrence prediction, outpatient psychiatric care, alternatives to hospitalization, antipsychotic drugs, mood stabilizers, living alone, working conditions, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, psychosis, depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review