Cited by 9Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Central Pain in Patients with Multiple sclerosis

Open access
S, Feketova, I, Waczulíkova, P, Valkovic, J, Mares·2017·Journal of Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Central pain (CP) is little recognized and diagnosed type of pain in multiple sclerosis. Objective: This second part of our work related to pain in multiple sclerosis is concentrated on occurrence of CP and defined its characteristics. Methods: Questionnaires on pain were sent to 307 patients with definitive multiple sclerosis diagnose. Patients admitting to CP were examined with aim to diagnose CP. The dates were statistically processed. Results: Out of 220 responders 92% reported pain during the course of their multiple sclerosis. CP was found in 57.72%, including 40.91% with central neuropathic extremity and trunk pain (CNEP), 5.91% with trigeminal neuralgia (TN), and 33.18% with Lhermitte‘s sign (LS). In 28.8% of all patients, CP was an initial multiple sclerosis symptom. The prevalence of CP does not increase with age, disease duration, or the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Lower extremities were the commonest location of CNEP (74.5%) and burning was the commonest painful sensation. Three and more concurrent unpleasant painful sensations experienced 68.9% of patients, which were in 46.7% located in the lower extremities. Three and more concurrent CP locations (including TN and LS) were reported by 89% of patients. Number of locations in CP increases significantly with age and EDSS, in contrast to group with nociceptive and peripheral neuropathic pain (n=113), where does not increase with age, EDSS and multiple sclerosis duration. The group with nociceptive and peripheral neuropathic pain featured significantly less patients with only one pain location (p=0.0269) and only one pain quality. In contrast to the other group, In CP increases significantly the number of patients with increase the number of concurrent pain qualities (p<0.0001). Conclusion: CP is not only a frequent complaint among persons with multiple sclerosis, but is a distinctive type of pain requiring special attention and their identification remains still the major challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4172/2376-0389.1000208

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensitivity analysis removing individual outliers did not affect the overall conclusions for overall or possible neuropathic pain, yielding 18.8% (95% CI 15.0-22.7) and 17.6% (95% CI 13.2-22.0), indicating robustness of the results.

    “The sensitivity analysis did not affect the overall conclusions of estimated prevalences after removing individual outliers (Feketová et al. 2017; Jallouli, Ghroubi, Ben Dhia, et al. 2025; Moisset et al. 2013), for either overall (18.8% [95% CI: 15.0; 22.7]) or possible (17.6% [95% CI: 13.2; 22.0]) neuropathic pain, indicating robustness of the results.”

    From The Prevalence of Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis—A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Using the <scp>NeuPSIG</scp> Algorithm (2026) · cites this paper as Feketová et al. 2017

    The Patients and Methods section (p. 2) describes analyses of this paper’s patient data, while the Prevalence of central pain section (p. 5) discusses its prevalence estimates. Searches for sensitivity analysis, removal of outliers, and the quoted prevalence estimates found no passage addressing whether removing this study changed the citing paper’s pooled results. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]2. Boivie J (2006) Central pain. Wall and Melzack´s Textbook of pain. Elsevier Inc., London 1057-1075.
  2. [14]14. [Putzki N, Pfriem A, Limmroth V, Yaldizli O, Tettenborn B, et al (2009) Prevalence of migraine, tension-type headache and trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 16: 262-267.](http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02406.x) · DOI
  3. [16]16. [Jensen TS, Baron R, Haanpää M, Kalso E, Loeser JD, et al. (2011) A new definition of neuropathic pain. Pain 152: 2204-2205.](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.017) · DOI
  4. [26]26. [Jensen TS, Baron R, Haanpää M, Kalso E, Loeser JD, et al. (2011) A new definition of neuropathic pain. Pain 152: 2204-2205.](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.017) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
S, F., I, W., P, V., & J, M.
Venue
Journal of Multiple Sclerosis
Published
2017
Volume
04
Issue
03
ISSN
2376-0389 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765279215
Cited by
8
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Multiple Sclerosis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
central pain, multiple sclerosis, trigeminal neuralgia, Lhermitte's sign, pain prevalence, pain quality, pain localization, Expanded Disability Status Scale, disease duration, neuropathic pain, nociceptive pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review