Cited by 32Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMarine Toxins and Detection MethodsEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Techniques for Detecting and Monitoring Algal Toxins and Causative Harmful Algal Blooms

Open access
·2014·Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

The detection and monitoring techniques for algal toxins and the causative harmful algal blooms (HABs) are essential for the protection of aquatic lives, shellfish safety, drinking water quality, and public health. Toward the development of fast, easy, and reliable techniques, much progress has been made during the last decade for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of algal toxins. This review highlights the recent progress and new trends of these analytical and monitoring tools, ranging from in-situ quick screening protocols for the monitoring of algal blooms to mass spectrometric analysis of trace levels of various algal toxins and structural elucidation. Solid-phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) deployed in the field for the passive sampling of algal toxins has been recently validated, and improved ELISA-based methods with lower detection limits for more toxins have become commercially available for both screening and routine monitoring purposes. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with several recent mass spectrometric innovations has expanded our understanding of traditional toxins, their metabolites along with newly discovered toxins of ecological importance. Several established in vivo and in vitro bioassays will continue to be used as benchmark toxicological testing of algal toxins; however, newly emerged molecular probing techniques such as real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) have extended our ability to trace algal toxins from caus…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4172/2380-2391.1000123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Venue
Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Published
2014
Volume
02
Issue
01
ISSN
2380-2391 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811211592
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Marine Toxins and Detection Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
harmful algal blooms, algal toxins, toxin detection, HAB monitoring, passive sampling, ELISA, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, bioassay, qPCR, chemical sensors, lab-on-a-chip, early warning, shellfish safety, drinking water quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Techniques for Detecting and Monitoring Algal Toxins and Causative Harmful Algal Blooms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4172/2380-2391.1000123
The paper
Current Techniques for Detecting and Monitoring Algal Toxins and Causative Harmful Algal Blooms. (2014). Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.4172/2380-2391.1000123