Cited by 41Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchMarine Toxins and Detection MethodsSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Differentiation of Algae Clones on the Basis of Resonance Raman Spectra Excited by Visible Light

Open access
Wu, Q., Nelson, W. H., Hargraves, P., Zhang, J., Brown, C. W., Seelenbinder, J. A.·1998·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Fourteen algae clones belonging to four different classes, including clones of Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae), some of which are capable of producing the toxin domoic acid, have been studied by means of resonance Raman spectra excited at 457.9 and 488 nm. Spectra taken at both excitation wavelengths are of high quality and are sufficiently distinct to differentiate clones at the algal class level. All spectra contain major features near 1000, 1153, and 1523 cm(-)(1), which are strongly resonance enhanced due to carotenoid pigments. Weaker features between 920-980 and 1170-1230 cm(-)(1), also due to carotenoid pigments, are more characteristic of the algae clones and more directly reflect different carotenoid composition. Similarities and differences among spectra have been analyzed by the method of principal component analysis (PCA). A distinct clustering of spectral data according to algal class has been shown by PCA score plots. All Pseudo-nitzschia clones can be separated from other classes of algae on the basis of spectra, but it is not possible to distinguish toxic Pseudo-nitzschia from nontoxic clones on the basis of these spectra, which reflect only differences in carotenoid composition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac971098b

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prominent carotenoid signal is not necessarily indicative of high carotenoid abundance because carotenoids contain delocalized π-electron systems, resulting in resonant excitation and strong amplification of the Raman signal.

    “it should be noted that the prominent carotenoid signal is not necessarily indicative of high carotenoid abundance, because carotenoids contain delocalized π-electron systems (conjugated C = C double bonds), resulting in a resonant excitation and thus strong amplification of the Raman signal30.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Q., Nelson, W. H., Hargraves, P., Zhang, J., Brown, C. W., & Seelenbinder, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Rhode Island (US)
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
1998-04-03
Volume
70
Issue
9
Pages
1782-1787
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2046783048
Cited by
41
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Commerce
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Marine Toxins and Detection Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
resonance Raman spectroscopy, Pseudo-nitzschia, domoic acid, carotenoids, algal taxonomy, visible light excitation, diatoms, spectral clustering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review