Cited by 51Academic Writing and PublishingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAcademic Publishing and Open Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions

Open access
Ahn, Sangzin·2024·The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming medical writing and publishing. This review article focuses on experimental evidence to provide a comprehensive overview of the current applications, challenges, and future implications of LLMs in various stages of academic research and publishing process. Global surveys reveal a high prevalence of LLM usage in scientific writing, with both potential benefits and challenges associated with its adoption. LLMs have been successfully applied in literature search, research design, writing assistance, quality assessment, citation generation, and data analysis. LLMs have also been used in peer review and publication processes, including manuscript screening, generating review comments, and identifying potential biases. To ensure the integrity and quality of scholarly work in the era of LLM-assisted research, responsible artificial intelligence (AI) use is crucial. Researchers should prioritize verifying the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content, maintain transparency in the use of LLMs, and develop collaborative human-AI workflows. Reviewers should focus on higher-order reviewing skills and be aware of the potential use of LLMs in manuscripts. Editorial offices should develop clear policies and guidelines on AI use and foster open dialogue within the academic community. Future directions include addressing the limitations and biases of current LLMs, exploring innovative applications, and continuously updating policies and practices in response to technological advancements. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are necessary to harness the transformative potential of LLMs while maintaining the integrity of medical writing and publishing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.5.393

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Large language models (LLMs) can be used in various steps of research and writing. A detailed tutorial of how to utilize large language models during each process is provided as a supplementary material.
Fig. 1 Large language models (LLMs) can be used in various steps of research and writing. A detailed tutorial of how to utilize large language models during each process is provided as a supplementary material.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1038/s41586-023-06887-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1515/cclm-2023-1136 · DOI
  3. 10.12688/f1000research.142411.2 · DOI
  4. 10.1101/2024.03.08.24303960 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.tics.2023.12.002 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/08989621.2023.2273377 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103720 · DOI
  8. 10.1055/a-2224-9230 · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0217931 · DOI
  10. 10.2196/46924 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2106/JBJS.23.00473 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/ejo/cjae011 · DOI
  14. 10.7759/cureus.37432 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100584 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/1742-6723.14233 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/glycob/cwad064 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/rcs.2621 · DOI
  19. 10.7759/cureus.49019 · DOI
  20. 10.7759/cureus.37589 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/humrep/dead207 · DOI
  22. Deveci CD, Baker JJ, Sikander B, Rosenberg J. A comparison of cover letters written by ChatGPT-4 or humans. Dan Med J. 2023;70:A06230412.
  23. 10.5334/pme.1246 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/15265161.2023.2233356 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103980 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.3390/jpm13101457 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00405-023-08205-4 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011511 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s41669-024-00477-8 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s10439-023-03324-9 · DOI
  31. 10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e8 · DOI
  32. Manning BS, Zhu K, Horton JJ. Automated social science: language models as scientist and subjects. arXiv:2404.11794 [Preprint]; 2024 [cited 2024 Jun 3]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.11794. · DOI
  33. 10.1002/ohn.526 · DOI
  34. 10.1057/s41599-020-00703-8 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.7759/cureus.43023 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104145 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.009 · DOI
  39. 10.1145/3597307 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.7759/cureus.42150 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41746-024-01185-7 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.2196/49323 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahn, S.
Affiliations
Inje University (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Sangzin
Venue
The Korean Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology
Published
2024-09-01
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
393-401
ISSN
  • 1226-4512 (ISSN-L)
  • 2093-3827
OpenAlex
W4402025438
Cited by
51
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 2
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2018R1A5A2021242)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
large language models, medical writing, scholarly publishing, AI-assisted peer review, manuscript screening, research design, literature searching, citation generation, AI-generated content quality, responsible AI use, human-AI collaboration, research integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review