The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytoremediation: A Green Technology to Remove Environmental Pollutants
Open accessAbstract
Land, surface waters, and ground water worldwide, are increasingly affected by contaminations from industrial, research experiments, military, and agricultural activities either due to ignorance, lack of vision, carelessness, or high cost of waste disposal and treatment. The rapid build-up of toxic pollutants (metals, radionuclide, and organic contaminants in soil, surface water, and ground water) not only affects natural resources, but also causes major strains on ecosystems. Interest in phytoremediation as a method to solve environmental contamination has been growing rapidly in recent years. This green technology that involved “tolerant plants” has been utilized to clean up soil and ground water from heavy metals and other toxic organic compounds. Phytoremediation involves growing plants in a contaminated matrix to remove environmental contaminants by facilitating sequestration and/or degradation (detoxification) of the pollutants. Plants are unique organisms equipped with remarkable metabolic and absorption capabilities, as well as transport systems that can take up nutrients or contaminants selectively from the growth matrix, soil or water. As extensive as these benefits are, the costs of using plants along with other concerns like climatic restrictions that may limit growing of plants and slow speed in comparison with conventional methods (i.e., physical and chemical treatment) for bioremediation must be considered carefully. While the benefits of using phytoremediation to restore balance to a stressed environment seem to far outweigh the cost, the largest barrier to the advancement of phytoremediation could be the public opposition. The long-term implication of green plant technology in removing or sequestering environmental contaminations must be addressed thoroughly. As with all new technology, it is important to proceed with caution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A long way ahead: understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation
Clemens, S., Palmgren, M. G., & Krämer, U. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02295-1 · Cited by 1,265
Lead phytoextraction: species variation in lead uptake and translocation
HUANG, J. W., & CUNNINGHAM, S. D. (1996) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01147.x · Cited by 622
Cited by
Toxicity and detoxification of heavy metals during plant growth and metabolism
Dubey, S., Shri, M., Gupta, A., Rani, V., & Chakrabarty, D. (2018) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-018-0741-8 · Cited by 293
Life cycle assessment of heavy metal contaminated sites: phytoremediation and soil excavation
Lin, L.-D., Ho, J.-R., Yang, B.-Y., Ko, C.-H., & Chang, F.-C. (2022) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2021.1937933 · Cited by 22
De Bernardi, A., Casucci, C., Businelli, D., D’Amato, R., Beone, G. M., Fontanella, M. C., & Vischetti, C. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9050580 · Cited by 21
Durumin Iya, N. I., Assim, Z. B., Omorinoye, O. A., & Asare, E. A. (2022) · Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences · doi:10.4314/dujopas.v8i2a.18 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Paz-Alberto, A. M., & Sigua, G. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Climate Change
- Publisher
- Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 02
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 71-86
- ISSN
- 2167-9495 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-9509
- OpenAlex
- W1978694944
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoremediation: A Green Technology to Remove Environmental Pollutants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4236/ajcc.2013.21008
- The paper
- Paz-Alberto, A. M., & Sigua, G. C. (2013). Phytoremediation: A Green Technology to Remove Environmental Pollutants. American Journal of Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2013.21008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.