Cited by 1,265Plant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsHeavy metals in environmentHeavy Metals in Plants

A long way ahead: understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation

Clemens, Stephan, Palmgren, Michael G, Krämer, Ute·2002·Trends in Plant Science

Abstract

Some plants can hyperaccumulate metal ions that are toxic to virtually all other organisms at low dosages. This trait could be used to clean up metal-contaminated soils. Moreover, the accumulation of heavy metals by plants determines both the micronutrient content and the toxic metal content of our food. Complex interactions of transport and chelating activities control the rates of metal uptake and storage. In recent years, several key steps have been identified at the molecular level, enabling us to initiate transgenic approaches to engineer the transition metal content of plants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02295-1

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hyperaccumulators employ at least four mechanisms to accumulate metal ions: transport of metals through roots from the soil, radial metal ion transport in roots, root-to-shoot metal accumulation, and detoxification at storage sites.

    “They employ at least four mechanisms to accumulate metal ions, viz. transport of metals through roots from the soil, radial metal ion transport in roots, root to shoot metal accumulation, and detoxification at storage sites (Clemens, 2001; Clemens et al., 2002; Mari and Lebrun, 2005; Merlot et al., 2018; Corso and de la Torre, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clemens, S., Palmgren, M. G., & Krämer, U.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology (DE)
Corresponding author
Clemens, Stephan
Venue
Trends in Plant Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
309-315
ISSN
1360-1385 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991564945
Cited by
1,265
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 57
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Plant Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
Keywords
hyperaccumulation, heavy metal accumulation, metal-contaminated soil remediation, phytoremediation, metal transport, metal chelation, micronutrient content, transgenic plants, metal homeostasis
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Biological Transport, Environmental Pollution, Genetic Engineering, Plants, Metals, Heavy, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review