Cited by 35Digital Education and SocietyTeaching and Learning ProgrammingEducational Technology in Learning

The Constructionist Learning Approach in the Digital Age

Open access
Levin, Ilya, Tsybulsky, Dina·2017·Creative Education

Abstract

The article deals with the evolution of the constructionist learning approach from the beginning of the era of information technologies through the digital age. The evolution of constructionism is demonstrated in connection with two associated processes: changes in the human worldview related to the digital shift, and the corresponding transformations in human society. The study examines the evolution of basic constructionist ideas: 1) “microworlds” as “incubators of knowledge”; 2) a child as “the architect of his [or her] intelligent structures”; 3) the computer as “a machine that brings back a natural character to learning”; 4) coding as a “universal learning activity” that enables the study of fundamental scientific ideas. The constructionist ideas are analyzed in the context of today’s digital reality. The main contribution of the study is formulating the changes in classical constructionism as transformations that correspond to worldview components: activating the perception of self; democratization of the mutual interactions with others; virtualization of the conception of reality; integration the subject and object in their interaction with reality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/ce.2017.815169

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Freud, S. (1955). A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-Analysis. In the Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, (1917-1919): "An Infantile Neurosis" and Other Works (Vol. XVII, pp. 135-144). London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
  2. A Teacher's View. Computerra Online: Electronic Journal. http://old.computerra.ru/readitorial/393364/ (in Russian)
  3. Papert, S. (1990). Perestroika and Epistemological Politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT Media Laboratory.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, I., & Tsybulsky, D.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Creative Education
Published
2017
Volume
08
Issue
15
Pages
2463-2475
ISSN
  • 2151-4755 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-4771
OpenAlex
W2775950490
Cited by
35
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Creative Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
constructionism, microworlds, computer-assisted instruction, digital era, human worldview, virtual reality, self-perception, subject-object interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review