Cited by 3Knowledge Management in Higher EducationDigital Transformation of Higher EducationE-Learning and Knowledge Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Knowledge Modeling and Institutional Memory at the University of Cape Coast: Examining Technology as a Mediator and Leadership Styles as a Moderator in Enhancing Administrative Efficiency

Open access
Manu, Harriette Nusrat, Onyame, Eleanor Afua, Mensah, Eunice Amoako, Annim, Sarah, Abdul-Gafaar, Sayibu·2025·Intelligent Information Management

Abstract

The integration of digital tools and effective knowledge management practices is critical for enhancing administrative efficiency and institutional continuity in higher education. This study investigates the relationships between knowledge modeling, institutional memory, leadership styles, technology, and administrative efficiency at the University of Cape Coast (UCC). The study sought to identify the challenges and opportunities in integrating digital tools into administrative processes and to provide actionable recommendations for improvement. A mixed-methods research design was employed, combining quantitative analysis using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with qualitative thematic analysis of interviews. The findings revealed key challenges, including resistance to change, fragmented knowledge repositories, and inadequate funding, alongside opportunities such as centralized knowledge systems, cost-effective open-source tools, and capacity-building initiatives. The study highlights the importance of strategic leadership, robust policies, and investments in digital infrastructure to enhance administrative practices. Policy implications include the need for clear digital transformation guidelines and leadership training to foster innovation and collaboration. Recommendations include investing in scalable digital tools, implementing comprehensive capacity-building programs, and promoting stakeholder engagement to drive successful digital integration. These insights provide a roadmap for UCC and similar institutions seeking to optimize administrative efficiency through digital transformation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/iim.2025.171001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Chigada, J. and Madzinga, R. (2019) Knowledge Management Practices and Their Impact on Organisational Performance: A Case of a Developing Economy. South African Journal of Information Management, 21, 1-10.
  2. Nawaz, N. and Gomes, A.M. (2020) Knowledge Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Library Hi Tech, 38, 761-777.
  3. 10.4018/978-1-5225-2394-9.ch014 · DOI
  4. Trivella, L., Dimitrios, B. and Kottaridi, C. (2021) Knowledge Management Strategy in Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Business Research, 123, 395-405.
  5. 10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gunjal, B. and Srinivas, S. (2020) Role of Knowledge Management in Higher Education Institutions: A Review. International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, 8, 7-15.
  7. Gyamfi, S. (2021) Exploring Digital Transformation in Ghanaian Higher Education Institutions. Journal of African Higher Education Development, 6, 45-62.
  8. 10.3390/su12145824. · DOI
  9. Mokua, M. and Wanyonyi, A. (2020) Leadership Styles and Knowledge Management Adoption in African Universities. African Journal of Leadership Studies, 8, 27-45.
  10. Sarwar, H. and Rasheed, M.I. (2020) Transformational Leadership and Employee Knowledge Sharing: Exploring the Mediating Role of Knowledge-Centered Culture. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 50, 313-329.
  11. Taherdoost, H. and Milani, F.S. (2021) Understanding Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Transformational Leadership: Implications for Knowledge Management. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6, 124-132.
  12. Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition, Free Press.
  13. 10.4324/9781410617095 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2308/isys-2021-013 · DOI
  15. Amoako, G.K. and Oduro-Mensah, D. (2020) Knowledge Management Adoption in Ghanaian Universities: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of African Higher Education, 8, 112-128.
  16. Agbozo, E., Aikins, A. and Addo, J. (2020) Knowledge Management Practices in African Universities: Challenges and Opportunities. African Journal of Business and Management, 14, 110-123.
  17. 10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1277 · DOI
  18. Nawaz, N. and Gomes, A.M. (2020) Knowledge Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Library Hi Tech, 38, 761-777.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Manu, H. N., Onyame, E. A., Mensah, E. A., Annim, S., & Abdul-Gafaar, S.
Affiliations
University of Cape Coast (GH)
Venue
Intelligent Information Management
Published
2025
Volume
17
Issue
01
Pages
1-30
ISSN
  • 2150-8208 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-5912
  • 2160-5920
OpenAlex
W4408003967
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Intelligent Information Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Knowledge Management in Higher Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital Transformation of Higher Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › E-Learning and Knowledge Management
Keywords
knowledge modeling, institutional memory, administrative efficiency, leadership styles, digital transformation, university administration, University of Cape Coast, resistance to change, knowledge repository, open source tools, capacity building, digital infrastructure, leadership training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review