Cited by 52Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCriminal Law and EvidenceDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

End-to-End Encryption in Messaging Services and National Security—Case of WhatsApp Messenger

Open access
Endeley, Robert E.·2018·Journal of Information Security

Abstract

The ubiquity of instant messaging services on mobile devices and their use of end-to-end encryption in safeguarding the privacy of their users have become a concern for some governments. WhatsApp messaging service has emerged as the most popular messaging app on mobile devices today. It uses end-to-end encryption which makes government and secret services efforts to combat organized crime, terrorists, and child pornographers technically impossible. Governments would like a “backdoor” into such apps, to use in accessing messages and have emphasized that they will only use the “backdoor” if there is a credible threat to national security. Users of WhatsApp have however, argued against a “backdoor”; they claim a “backdoor” would not only be an infringement of their privacy, but that hackers could also take advantage of it. In light of this security and privacy conflict between the end users of WhatsApp and government’s need to access messages in order to thwart potential terror attacks, this paper presents the advantages of maintaining E2EE in WhatsApp and why governments should not be allowed a “backdoor” to access users’ messages. This research presents the benefits encryption has on consumer security and privacy, and also on the challenges it poses to public safety and national security.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/jis.2018.91008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decentralized data-sharing fortifies data security through its distributed structure, rendering it resistant to targeted cyber-attacks or data breaches.

    “Primarily, it fortifies data security through its distributed structure, rendering it resistant to targeted cyber-attacks or data breaches [43] [44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Yeboah, J. and Ewur, G. (2014) The Impact of WhatsApp Messenger Usage on Stu- dents Performance in Tertiary Institutions in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 157-164.
  2. Jisha, K. and Jebakumar (2014) A Trend Setter in Mobile Communication among Chennai Youth. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 19, 01-06.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Endeley, R. E.
Affiliations
Capitol Technology University (US)
Corresponding author
Endeley, Robert E.
Venue
Journal of Information Security
Published
2018
Volume
09
Issue
01
Pages
95-99
ISSN
  • 2153-1234 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-1242
OpenAlex
W2789018040
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Information Security (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
end-to-end encryption, WhatsApp, instant messaging, backdoors, national security, user privacy, terrorism, organized crime, child pornography, encryption backdoors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review