Cited by 18Quality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization TechniquesManagement Systems and Quality Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Leveraging Lean in the Office: Lean Office Needs a Novel and Differentiated Approach

Open access
Rüttimann, Bruno G., Fischer, Urs P., Stöckli, Martin T.·2014·Journal of Service Science and Management

Abstract

Lean Six Sigma tools have been increasingly employed also in the service industry, however with different success as field studies have shown. The reason not only has to be attributed to a poor Change Management, but can also be attributed to the intrinsic characteristics of the Lean techniques, which have been tailored to sustain a stable customer-takted pull-manufacturing principle. An office workplace shows significant differences to a procedural shop floor environment, as it comprises both, procedural and relational processes. The office environment, therefore, cannot be described by a purely transactional shop floor model—it necessitates a separate model, with a differenciated approach, which covers the procedural as well as the relational aspects of office tasks. Also the different characteristics of the transaction object as well as the operation transformation and process governance do not allow an un-adapted application of Toyota’s comprehensive Lean toolset. The approach of Lean for the office environment needs a reinterpretation of the Lean logic and TPS Lean tools for the procedural part as well. Therefore, different and adapted approaches and tools are clearly necessary. The paper shows the objectives and principles of Lean and why Lean manufacturing is also interesting to be applied in the office environment. The differences between office and production jobs are detailed and introduce the problem of lean application in the office. The particular characteristics of the office environment are discussed and enable to enter into the Relational Office Model. Furthermore, we explain the paradigm shift which is necessary to take full benefit of the Lean approach in the office environment, however without presenting the reinterpreted office Lean toolset due to space reasons. This will be the topic of a next paper.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/jssm.2014.75032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ohno, T. (1988) Toyota Production System—Beyond Large Scale Production. Productivity Press, New York.
  2. Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (1990) The Machine That Changed the World. Free Press, New York.
  3. George, M.L. (2003) Lean Six Sigma for Service. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  4. Association for Manufacturing Excellence (2007) Lean Administration—Case Studies in Leadership and Improvement. Productivity Press, New York.
  5. Ruttimann, B.G., Fischer, U.P. and Stockli, M.T. (2011) Aufstieg und Fall von Six Sigma... oder warum heute Lean wichtiger ist. iO new Management, Springer, Axel Springer Schweiz, Zurich.
  6. Chen, J.C. and Cox, R.A. (2012) Value Stream Management for Lean Office—A Case Study. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2, 17-19. · DOI
  7. Bonaccorsi, A., Carmignani, G. and Zammori, F. (2011) Service Value Stream Mapping (SVSM): Developing Lean Thinking in the Service Industry. Journal of Service Science and Management, 4, 428-439. · DOI
  8. Kahneman, D. (2012) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rüttimann, B. G., Fischer, U. P., & Stöckli, M. T.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
Journal of Service Science and Management
Published
2014
Volume
07
Issue
05
Pages
352-360
ISSN
  • 1940-9893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9907
OpenAlex
W2123911934
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Service Science and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
Keywords
Lean Six Sigma, office workplaces, Toyota Production System, change management, process governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review