The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Artificial Intelligence in Classroom Assessment: Opportunities, Equity Challenges, and Best Practices for Formative and Summative Integration
Open accessAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming classroom assessment by enabling adaptive, data-driven, and personalized approaches that extend beyond the limitations of traditional methods.This paper presents a systematic literature review of recent peer-reviewed studies focusing on AI integration in both formative and summative assessments.The review synthesizes evidence on four thematic areas: personalization, efficiency, and scalability; equity and inclusion challenges; ethical and transparency concerns; and methodological gaps in current research.Findings indicate that AI-powered tools-such as adaptive learning platforms, automated scoring systems, and natural language processing applications enhance feedback timeliness, assessment accuracy, and instructional responsiveness, particularly in high-resource settings with strong infrastructure, teacher training, and policy support.However, persistent challenges related to algorithmic bias, data privacy, transparency, and unequal access in low-resource contexts limit equitable adoption.Methodological imbalances in the literature, including overreliance on pilot studies in affluent contexts, further constrain generalizability.The paper concludes that realizing AI's transformative potential in classroom assessment requires equity-centered implementation, culturally responsive design, robust governance, and sustained professional development to ensure AI serves as a tool for inclusion rather than a mechanism for reinforcing educational disparities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Chaudhry, M.A. and Kazim, S. (2022) Artificial Intelligence in Computer Science: Bridging Human and Machine Cognition. International Journal of Computer Science and AI, 10, 23-31.
- Akgun, B. and Greenhow, C. (2022) The Integration of AI in Education: Classroom Assessment and Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 245- 258.
- Delgado, A., Wardlow, L., Olin, S. and McKnight, K. (2020) The Effects of Using Adaptive Learning Technology on Student Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2161-2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09807-4 · DOI
- Popenici, S.A.D. and Kerr, S. (2017) Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, S., Fan, W. and He, L. (2020) Adaptive Learning Systems for Personalized Ed- ucation: Insights from the Case of ALEKS. Educational Technology Research and De- velopment, 68, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09713-7 · DOI
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M. and Gouverneur, F. (2019) Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education-Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Educa- tion, 16, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M. and Aleven, V. (2018) Student Learning Benefits of a Real-Time Classroom Orchestration Tool Supported by Teacher AI. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK), Vol. 10, 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170361 · DOI
- Balfour, S.P. (2013) Assessing Writing in MOOCs: Automated Essay Scoring and Calibrated Peer Review. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 40-48.
- Strobl, C., et al. (2019) Machine Learning for Automated Essay Scoring: A Review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57, 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117741520 · DOI
- Johnson, W.L. and Lester, J.C. (2015) Face-to-Face Interaction with Pedagogical Agents, Twenty Years Later. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Educa- tion, 26, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0065-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Shute, V.J. and Rahimi, S. (2017) Review of Computer-Based Assessment for Learn- ing in Elementary and Secondary Education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12172 · DOI
- Stone, D., et al. (2020) The Role of AI in Remote Proctoring and Exam Security. Ed- ucational Research Review, 31, Article ID: 100334.
- Dawson, P. (2015) Five Ways to Hack and Cheat with Bring-Your-Own-Device Elec- tronic Examinations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 592-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12246 · DOI
- Li, H., Yang, S. and Sun, Y. (2021) Evaluating Automated Feedback Mechanisms in Writing Assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 58, 222-240.
- Dikli, S. (2019) Automated Essay Scoring: Applications to Educational Technology. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3, 1-20.
- Ifenthaler, D. and Schumacher, C. (2016) Learning Analytics in Higher Education: A Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 924-937.
- Koedinger, K.R., et al. (2013) Predictive Analytics in Education: Methods and Appli- cations. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Ed- ucation, 7, 3-19.
- Dawson, S. (2016) Five Ways to Hack and Cheat with Electronic Examinations. Brit- ish Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 592-600.
- Walker, J. (2010) Student Plagiarism in Universities: Learning for Better Assessment in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903062892 · DOI
- Sharma, D., Jones, R. and Smith, K. (2020) The Ethics of AI in Education: Privacy and Security Concerns. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23, 75-85.
- Benitez, K., Gordon, A. and Olson, J. (2017) AI in Education: The Importance of Ethics and Bias Management. AIED Journal, 25, 112-128.
- Selwyn, N. (2019) Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. John Wiley & Sons.
- Jomaa, N.J. (2025) Corrective Feedback of AI Tools in Writing and Translation. In: Using AI Tools in Text Analysis, Simplification, Classification, and Synthesis, IGI Global, 293-318. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9511-0.ch010 · DOI
- Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A. and Hossain, M.S. (2022) Artificial In- telligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Edu- cation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, Article ID: 5215722. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722 · DOI · Paper page
- West, R., Hoopes, R. and Berrett, D. (2020) The Future of AI in Summative Assess- ments: Implications and Innovations. Educational Assessment, 25, 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1832680 · DOI
- Holmes, W. and Tuomi, I. (2022) State of the Art and Practice in AI in Education. European Journal of Education, 57, 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533 · DOI · Paper page
- Olanrewaju, A.S. (2024) The Nexus of Human Communication and AI in the Work- place. Journal of Communication and Management, 3, 260-264. https://doi.org/10.58966/jcm20243311 · DOI
- Heffernan, N.T. and Heffernan, C.L. (2014) The Assessments Ecosystem: Building a Platform That Brings Scientists and Teachers Together for Minimally Invasive Research on Human Learning and Teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 470-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0024-x · DOI · Paper page
- Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M. and Forcier, L.B. (2016) Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
- Ifenthaler, D. and Yau, J.Y. (2020) Reflections on Different Learning Analytics Indi- cators for Supporting Study Success. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education, 2, 4-23. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i2.15639 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salim, A., Gonibala, R., Talibo, I., & Baba, M. A. (2025) · Nazhruna Jurnal Pendidikan Islam · doi:10.31538/nzh.v9i1.196 · Cited by 7
How unique are hallucinated citations offered by generative Artificial Intelligence models?
Spennemann, D. H. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.16407 · Cited by 4
Will It Teach as Intended? How Teachers Configure Educational AI Chatbots
Riahi, B., Ozturk, D., Guth, A., Li, J.-Y., Singh, D., Tian, X.-Y., Chiu, J. L., Lytle, N., Barnes, T., & Cateté, V. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.29993
“In practice, educators use generative chatbots to automate routine tasks, such as generating differentiated lesson plans [10, 27, 44], designing assessments and rubrics [34, 59], streamlining grading workflows [23] and providing formative feedback to students [8, 25].”
AI for inclusion: a powerful idea – under which conditions?!
Baumann, L., Heitplatz, V. N., Pelka, B., Dirks, S., & Gerken, J. (2026) · Journal of Enabling Technologies · doi:10.1108/jet-01-2026-0007
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalonde, G., Boateng, S., & Duedu, C.
- Affiliations
- Montana State University (US)
- ORCID
- Boateng, Samuel
- Venue
- OALib
- Publisher
- Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 2333-9705 (ISSN-L)
- 2333-9721
- OpenAlex
- W4414673253
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- OALib (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, classroom assessment, formative assessment, summative assessment, adaptive learning systems, automated grading, algorithmic bias, educational equity, data privacy, transparency, personalized learning, teacher professional development, resource-limited settings, culturally responsive design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review