Cited by 22Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStudent Stress and CopingMental Health Treatment and Access

Associated Factors and Impacts of Social Phobia on Academic Performance among Students from the University of Parakou (UP)

Open access
Djidonou, Anselme, Tchégnonsi, Francis Tognon, Adoukonou, Thierry, Ataïgba, Iréti Nethania Elie, Assa-Issa, Chérifath Nawale, Gandaho, Prosper·2016·Open Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Social phobia disrupts students in their academic career. The aim of this research work was to study this anxious disorder impact on the academic performance among students from the University of Parakou (UP). Study methods: It was a descriptive cross-sectional study with prospective data collection among 363 students recruited through systematic random sampling from April to June 2015 at the campus of the UP. A questionnaire including the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), the Liebowitz social anxiety intensity evaluation scale and the ASSIST was used for data collection in compliance with recommended ethical principles. Results and Conclusion Social phobia prevalence among students from the campus of University of Parakou was 11. 6% [CI95% = 10. 9 - 21. 2]. Its intensity was moderate (66.7%), medium (23.4%), severe (7.1%) and very severe (4.8%) only among female students. Moreover, gender, rural or urban living environment and field of study were statistically associated with this social phobia which reduced academic performance by 57.1%, among the studied population. However, 42.9% were not influenced in any way. Addiction to alcoholic beverages (23.8%) and anxiolytics (9.5%) were used to overcome the disorder. Although the risk of dependency to these substances was low, adverse effects on their health and socio-professional future were to be taken seriously.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/ojpsych.2016.62018

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Djidonou, A., Tchégnonsi, F. T., Adoukonou, T., Ataïgba, I. N. E., Assa-Issa, C. N., & Gandaho, P.
Affiliations
Université de Parakou (BJ)
Corresponding author
Djidonou, Anselme
Venue
Open Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016
Volume
06
Issue
02
Pages
151-157
ISSN
  • 2161-7325 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-7333
OpenAlex
W2309561699
Cited by
22
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Open Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, social anxiety, academic performance, university students, prevalence, gender differences, alcohol consumption, anxiolytic use, substance dependence, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review