The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short Communication Development of novel microsatellite markers for conservation genetic studies of Vulpes vulpes (Canidae) by using next-generation sequencing method
Open accessAbstract
The red fox, Vulpes vulpes (Canidae), is the most widely distributed terrestrial carnivore worldwide, but this species is classified as endangered in Korea. In this study, we developed 25 polymorphic microsatellite markers that included 3-13 (mean = 6.32) alleles per locus using 22 red fox individuals. The most polymorphic locus was FR(59)TG (13 alleles) and the least polymorphic loci were FR(70)TG and FR(182)AG (3 alleles each). No significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.05) was observed for the 25 markers. Observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity varied from 0.182 to 1.000 and from 0.175 to 0.929, respectively. These newly developed microsatellite markers will be useful for investigating the genetic diversity and population genetic structure of V. vulpes and will aid in developing conservation strategies for this species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Genotyping was carried out using a multiplex PCR of 20 autosomal microsatellite loci (RF 21, 59, 125, 127, 131, 143, 155, 156, 162, 165, 199, 20065; VVM 219, 85, 838, 529, 189, 844, 82866), explicitly developed for the red fox.”
From Nutritional ecology of a prototypical generalist predator, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) (2024) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer3 on the WWW for General Users and for Biologist Programmers
Rozen, S., & Skaletsky, H. (2003) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365 · Cited by 15,068
Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis
Excoffier, L., Laval, G., & Schneider, S. (2005) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.1177/117693430500100003 · Cited by 14,265
micro ‐ checker : software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data
VAN OOSTERHOUT, C., HUTCHINSON, W. F., WILLS, D. P. M., & SHIPLEY, P. (2004) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x · Cited by 10,327
An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments
Schuelke, M. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/72708 · Cited by 3,616
History and current status of mammals of the Korean Peninsula
Won, C., & Smith, K. G. (1999) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.1999.00034.x · Cited by 101
Yu, J.-N., Han, S.-H., Kim, B., Kryukov, A., Kim, S., Lee, B., & Kwak, M. (2012) · Zoological Science · doi:10.2108/zsj.29.753 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wegge, P., Bakke, B. B., Odden, M., & Rolstad, J. (2018) · Mammal Research · doi:10.1007/s13364-018-0408-7 · Cited by 22
Nutritional ecology of a prototypical generalist predator, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)
Balestrieri, A., Gigliotti, S., Caniglia, R., Velli, E., Zambuto, F., De Giorgi, E., Mucci, N., Tremolada, P., & Gazzola, A. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58711-6 · Cited by 8
Tada, T., Seki, Y., Kameyama, Y., Kikkawa, Y., & Wada, K. (2016) · Genetics and Molecular Research · doi:10.4238/gmr15049104 · Cited by 3
“Several microsatellite markers have been developed for foxes belonging to the genus Vulpes (Wandeler and Funk, 2006; Yan et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J.-N., Chung, C.-U., Oh, K. H., Lee, B.-K., & Lim, C. E.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Biological Resources (KR)
- Korea National Park Service (KR)
- Venue
- Genetics and Molecular Research
- Publisher
- Genetics and Molecular Research
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 3980-3983
- ISSN
- 1676-5680 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2285682118
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genetics and Molecular Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biological Resources
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- red fox, microsatellite markers, genetic diversity, population structure, conservation genetics, threatened species, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, heterozygosity, marker development
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Animals, Base Sequence, Conservation of Natural Resources, Foxes, Genetics, Population, Heterozygote, Molecular Sequence Data, Genetic Variation, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Microsatellite Repeats, Endangered Species, Republic of Korea, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short Communication Development of novel microsatellite markers for conservation genetic studies of Vulpes vulpes (Canidae) by using next-generation sequencing method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4238/2015.april.27.12
- The paper
- Yu, J.-N., Chung, C.-U., Oh, K. H., Lee, B.-K., & Lim, C. E. (2015). Short Communication Development of novel microsatellite markers for conservation genetic studies of Vulpes vulpes (Canidae) by using next-generation sequencing method. Genetics and Molecular Research. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.april.27.12
