Cited by 2Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of novel polymorphic microsatellite markers for the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Open access
Yan, S.Q., Bai, C.Y., Qi, S.M., Li, Y.M., Li, W.J., Sun, J.H.·2015·Genetics and Molecular Research

Abstract

The silver fox (Vulpes vulpes), a coat color variant of the red fox, is one of the most important fur-bearing animals. To date, development of microsatellite loci for the silver fox has been limited and mainly based on cross-amplification by using canine SSR primers. In this study, 28 polymorphic microsatellite markers were isolated and identified for silver fox through the construction and screening of an (AC)n-enriched library. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 8 based on 48 individuals tested. The expected and observed hetero- zygosity and polymorphism information content per locus ranged from 0.2544 to 0.859, 0.2083 to 0.7917, and 0.2181 to 0.821, respectively. The polymorphic markers presented in this study may be useful for future analysis of the genetic diversity and population structure of farmed silver fox and wild red fox.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4238/2015.june.1.6

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genotyping was carried out using a multiplex PCR of 20 autosomal microsatellite loci explicitly developed for the red fox.

    “Genotyping was carried out using a multiplex PCR of 20 autosomal microsatellite loci (RF 21, 59, 125, 127, 131, 143, 155, 156, 162, 165, 199, 20065; VVM 219, 85, 838, 529, 189, 844, 82866), explicitly developed for the red fox.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sambrook J and Russel D (2001). Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yan, S. Q., Bai, C. Y., Qi, S. M., Li, Y. M., Li, W. J., & Sun, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Qingdao Agricultural University (CN)
Venue
Genetics and Molecular Research
Published
2015
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
5890-5895
ISSN
1676-5680 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W814758414
Cited by
2
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics and Molecular Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
silver fox, red fox, microsatellite markers, genetic diversity, population structure, heterozygosity, polymorphism information content
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Dogs, Foxes, Hair, Polymorphism, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Microsatellite Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review