Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology

Open access
Hamon, Martial, Pristipino, Christian, Di Mario, Carlo, Nolan, James, Ludwig, Josef, Tubaro, Marco, Sabate, Manel, Mauri-Ferré, Josepa, Huber, Kurt, Niemelä, Kari, Haude, Michael, Wijns, William, Dudek, Dariusz, Fajadet, Jean, Kiemeneij, Ferdinand·2013·EuroIntervention

Abstract

Radial access use has been growing steadily but, despite encouraging results, still varies greatly among operators, hospitals, countries and continents. Twenty years from its introduction, it was felt that the time had come to develop a common evidence-based view on the technical, clinical and organisational implications of using the radial approach for coronary angiography and interventions. The European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) has, therefore, appointed a core group of European and non-European experts, including pioneers of radial angioplasty and operators with different practices in vascular access supported by experts nominated by the Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Their goal was to define the role of the radial approach in modern interventional practice and give advice on technique, training needs, and optimal clinical indications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4244/eijv8i11a192

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Hamon, M., Pristipino, C., Di Mario, C., Nolan, J., Ludwig, J., Tubaro, M., Sabate, M., Mauri-Ferré, J., Huber, K., Niemelä, K., Haude, M., Wijns, W., Dudek, D., Fajadet, J., & Kiemeneij, F.
Venue
EuroIntervention
Published
2013-03
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
1242-1251
ISSN
1774-024X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119943845
Cited by
417
References
51
FWCI
43.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4244/eijv8i11a192
The paper
Hamon, M., Pristipino, C., Di Mario, C., Nolan, J., Ludwig, J., Tubaro, M., Sabate, M., Mauri-Ferré, J., Huber, K., Niemelä, K., Haude, M., Wijns, W., Dudek, D., Fajadet, J., & Kiemeneij, F. (2013). Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv8i11a192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.