Cited by 33Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsLiver Disease and TransplantationCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Cardiac stress testing and coronary artery disease in liver transplantation candidates: meta-analysis

Open access
Soldera, Jonathan, Camazzola, Fábio, Rodríguez, Santiago, Brandão, Ajacio·2018·World Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) in cirrhotic patients listed for liver transplantation (LT), using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as gold-standard. METHODS: Retrieval of studies was based on Medical Subject Headings and Health Sciences Descriptors, which were combined using Boolean operators. Searches were run on the electronic databases Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), BIREME (Biblioteca Regional de Medicina), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), Cochrane Library for Systematic Reviews and Opengray.eu. There was no language or date of publication restrictions. The reference lists of the studies retrieved were searched manually. RESULTS: The search strategy retrieved 322 references for DSE and 90 for MPS. In the final analysis, 10 references for DSE and 10 for MPS were included. Pooled sensitivity was 28% and 61% for DSE and MPS and specificity was 82% and 74%, for diagnosis of CAD using ICA as gold-standard, respectively. CONCLUSION: DSE and MPS do not have adequate sensitivity for determination of whether CAD is present, despite having significant specificity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4254/wjh.v10.i11.877

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soldera, J., Camazzola, F., Rodríguez, S., & Brandão, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de Caxias do Sul (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR)
Venue
World Journal of Hepatology
Published
2018-11-27
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
877-886
ISSN
1948-5182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902208579
Cited by
33
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • World Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
dobutamine stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, coronary artery disease, liver transplant candidates, liver cirrhosis, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, invasive coronary angiography, cardiac stress testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review