Cited by 28Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyViral Infections and Immunology ResearchHistory of Medicine and Tropical Health

The CORE Group Polio Project: An Overview of Its History and Its Contributions to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative

Open access
Losey, Lee, Ogden, Ellyn, Bisrat, Filimona, Solomon, Roma, Newberry, David, Coates, Ellen, Ward, Dora, Hilmi, Lisa +3 more·2019·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

The CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) has contributed to polio eradication by successfully engaging civil society, particularly the non-governmental organization (NGO) community. This engagement, which began with a grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development in 1999, has contributed to improvements in routine immunization programs, polio campaign quality, and surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis in many challenging geographic areas. The CGPP has worked closely with polio eradication partners in a collaborative and supportive role. The CGPP has focused largely on high-risk areas with marginalized or hard-to-reach populations where health systems and immunization programs have also been weak and where transmission of poliovirus had not been stopped. The CGPP has engaged local civic leaders and communities in ways to complement top-down vertical efforts of ministries of health and other partners in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The CGPP has developed innovative strategies to detect cases using community-based surveillance, promoted independent campaign monitoring, established cross-border initiatives, and developed a strong and creative cadre of community mobilizers to track missed children and deliver behavior change education. Many of the innovations and approaches that the CGPP helped to develop are now being replicated by governments and international agencies to tackle other public health priorities in underserved and marginalized communities around the world. This article is the first in a series of articles describing the work of the CGPP. Because the article describes the work of more than 40 NGOs in 11 countries over 20 years, it provides only an overview, leaving many important details and variations of the CGPP's work to be described elsewhere, including in other articles included in this series.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0916

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CORE Group Polio Project coordinated efforts of international and local national NGOs to engage communities and deploy CHWs at scale in 11 countries to address urgent needs in eradicating polio, strengthening immunization programmes more broadly, and responding to community priorities for maternal and child health.

    “The CORE Group Polio Project coordinated the efforts of international and local national NGOs to engage communities and deploy CHWs at scale in 11 countries to address urgent needs in eradicating polio, strengthening immunization programmes more broadly, and responding to community priorities for maternal and child health [80, 83].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 2018, The CORE Group
  2. 2017, About CORE Group: Who We Are
  3. 2019, Polio-Free Countries
  4. Storms, 2009, Final Review of the CORE Group Partners Polio Eradication Initiative, 1999–2008
  5. 2018, CORE Group Polio Project
  6. Stamidis, 2018, CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) Final Evaluation Report 2017
  7. 2014, Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Losey, L., Ogden, E., Bisrat, F., Solomon, R., Newberry, D., Coates, E., Ward, D., Hilmi, L., LeBan, K., Burrowes, V., & Perry, H. B.
Affiliations
  • CORE Group Polio Project, Washington, District of Columbia;
  • United States Agency for International Development (US)
  • CORE Group Polio Project/Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;
  • CORE Group Polio Project/India, Gurgaon, India;
  • CORE Group, Washington, District of Columbia;
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Perry, Henry B.
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2019-10-03
Volume
101
Issue
4_Suppl
Pages
4-14
ISSN
  • 0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-1645
OpenAlex
W2978131991
Cited by
28
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
Keywords
polio eradication, Global Polio Eradication Initiative, non-governmental organizations, civil society participation, community-based surveillance, acute flaccid paralysis surveillance, routine immunization, marginalized communities, hard-to-reach populations
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Poliomyelitis, Global Health, World Health Organization, History, 20th Century, Disease Eradication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review