The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Kato Thick-Smear Technique for Quantitative Diagnosis of Helminth Infections
Abstract
SummaryA method of fecal examination described by Kato and involving the clearing of a direct fecal smear pressed thin under a glycerin-impregnated cellophane coverslip was evaluated for possible use in quantitative diagnosis of helminth infections. Modifications were described for 1) removing fiber from the fecal sample, 2) uniformly spreading the smear, and 3) preventing over-clearing of the preparation. Optimum time for clearing the smears was found to be about 30 minutes at 35°C, or about 1 hour under openroom conditions.The thick-smear method was found to be as sensitive as the Bell filtration, zine-surface flotation, and Hoffman sedimentation methods of concentration of feces. Egg-counts for estimation of intestinal nematode and Schistosoma mansoni infections were as reproducible when made by the thick-smear method as by dilution or concentration procedures.Series of egg-counts made from the same stool and from daily stools indicated that eggs of S. mansoni, as well as those of other worms, are distributed randomly in the feces and are in equal numbers in the outer and inner portions of the stool. Thus egg-counts made by the thick-smear technique appear to be reliable for the quantitative diagnosis of helminth infect ons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drug Resistance in Human Helminths: Current Situation and Lessons from Livestock
Geerts, S., & Gryseels, B. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.2.207 · Cited by 355
Steinmann, P., Utzinger, J., Du, Z.-W., Jiang, J.-Y., Chen, J.-X., Hattendorf, J., Zhou, H., & Zhou, X.-N. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025003 · Cited by 176
Anthelmintic resistance in human helminths: a review
Geerts, S., & Gryseels, B. (2001) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00774.x · Cited by 163
Ngui, R., Lim, Y. A. L., Chong Kin, L., Sek Chuen, C., & Jaffar, S. (2012) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001550 · Cited by 159
Speich, B., Moser, W., Ali, S. M., Ame, S. M., Albonico, M., Hattendorf, J., & Keiser, J. (2016) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1406-8 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, L. K., & Beaver, P. C.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Published
- 1968-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 382-391
- ISSN
- 0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2332160716
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Kato Thick-Smear Technique for Quantitative Diagnosis of Helminth Infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4269/ajtmh.1968.17.382
- The paper
- Martin, L. K., & Beaver, P. C. (1968). Evaluation of Kato Thick-Smear Technique for Quantitative Diagnosis of Helminth Infections. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1968.17.382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.