Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ivermectin: Reduction in Prevalence and Infection Intensity of Onchocerca Volvulus Following Biannual Treatments in five Guatemalan Communities

Collins, R. C., Gonzales-Peralta, C., Castro, J., Zea-Flores, G., Cupp, M. S., Richards, F. O., Cupp, E. W.·1992·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Residents of five hyperendemic communities located in the central focus of onchocerciasis in Guatemala were treated with ivermectin (Mectizan) or placebo every six months for 30 months. The effects of treatment on prevalence and the intensity of skin infection (microfilarial skin density [MFD]) were evaluated. Significant and persistent reductions in both of these indices were achieved by coverage of 80.7% of the eligible populations. The highest proportionate reductions in both indicators of infection occurred after the first treatment, followed by more gradual decreases through the fourth treatment. In one community in which the mean coverage was 92.7%, prevalence decreased from 74.0% at pretreatment to 34.9% after four treatments, while the MFD decreased from 7.8 to 2.0; reductions of 52.8% and 74.3% from pretreatment values, respectively. In every ivermectin-treated community except one, in which drug acceptance was low, the mean community MFD values were reduced to the level associated with low infectiousness for the vector, Simulium ochraceum. Moreover, the category of MFD associated with high vector infectiousness was reduced at least ten-fold over the pretreatment level. One community had low participation during the first two treatments (32.8% and 22.7% of those eligible). This increased to 55.2% at the third treatment because of implementation of an educational program describing both the disease and the beneficial effects of ivermectin and because skin biopsies and nodulectomies were not performed. Secondary reaction rates for all communities were 29.5%, 9.9%, 10.3%, 8.2%, and 7.1% for the first through fifth treatments, respectively. Pruritus was the most common (34.0%) secondary reaction, followed by facial edema (31.8%). All reactions were classified as mild to moderate. Recommendations for mass distribution of ivermectin in Guatemala are given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.47.156

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Collins, R. C., Gonzales-Peralta, C., Castro, J., Zea-Flores, G., Cupp, M. S., Richards, F. O., & Cupp, E. W.
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
1992-08
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
156-169
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2463359715
Cited by
189
References
0
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ivermectin: Reduction in Prevalence and Infection Intensity of Onchocerca Volvulus Following Biannual Treatments in five Guatemalan Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4269/ajtmh.1992.47.156
The paper
Collins, R. C., Gonzales-Peralta, C., Castro, J., Zea-Flores, G., Cupp, M. S., Richards, F. O., & Cupp, E. W. (1992). Ivermectin: Reduction in Prevalence and Infection Intensity of Onchocerca Volvulus Following Biannual Treatments in five Guatemalan Communities. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1992.47.156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.