Condensate Drainage and Retention in Louver Fin Automotive Evaporators
Abstract
Condensate that forms on the air side surface of an evaporator can have a significant impact on the air side performance of brazed aluminum, louver fin automotive evaporators. Condensate can “bridge” the space between two adjacent fins or louvers and alter the flow of air through the evaporator, causing a change in the heat transfer and friction characteristics. This study attempts to determine how condensate drains from an evaporator in the hopes of improving the air side fin geometry and obtain an evaporator that retains a minimum amount of condensate.Using a table-top wind tunnel apparatus, qualitative observations of condensate draining from a single column of louver fins brazed to a refrigerant tube were made. The amount of condensate retained in an evaporator core was determined using the experimentally-verified dip test method. From this work, it has been determined that the louver pitch is the most important parameter in determining an evaporator’s ability to drain condensate. An evaporator with L p = 1.1 mm retains 26% more condensate than an evaporator with L p = 1.3 mm. This increase is due to an increase in condensate bridging of the louvers. Louver bridging occurs largely due to the existence of the louver cut end, where condensate may be pulled to and retained by surface tension. Almost no bridging of the fins occurs when P f = 2.4 mm; but when P f = 1.6 mm, significant fin bridging occurs and the amount of condensate retained increases by 32%. This increase occurs not only due to the decrease in the space between the fins but also because of the triangular shape of the fins when P f = 1.6 mm. When the air side surface of the evaporator is smooth, condensate drains from the evaporator via three paths whose effectiveness is largely determined by the louver pitch. If there are channels on the air side surface of the tubes, almost all of the condensate is pulled into these channels by surface tension and drains down through the channels, out of the evaporator. Condensate can build up at the intersection of a fin base and a channel, leading to an increase in fin bridging.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The difference in water retention could be a combined effect of the different fin geometry and the different construction of coil at the bottom.
“The difference in water retention could be a combined effect of the different fin geometry (see McLaughlin and Webb [22]) and the different construction of coil at the bottom (see Zhong et al. [23]).”
From Frost, defrost, and refrost and its impact on the air-side thermal-hydraulic performance of louvered-fin, flat-tube heat exchangers (2006) · cites this paper as McLaughlin and Webb [22]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xia, Y., Zhong, Y., Hrnjak, P. S., & Jacobi, A. M. (2006) · International Journal of Refrigeration · doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2006.03.005 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Kim, M.-H., Kim, H., Kim, D. R., & Lee, K.-S. (2016) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.028 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Kim, M.-H., Song, S., & Bullard, C. W. (2002) · International Journal of Refrigeration · doi:10.1016/s0140-7007(01)00061-5 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Ayad, F., Benelmir, R., & Idris, M. (2021) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116218 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Xiong, T., Liu, G., Gao, Q., Yan, G., & Yu, J. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105654 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flat tube heat exchangers: Experimental analysis of frosting and water retention
Westhaeuser, J., Brauchle, L., Albrecht, J.-C., Tegethoff, W., Lemke, N., & Koehler, J. (2023) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119319 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- McLaughlin, W. J., & Webb, R. L.
- Venue
- SAE Technical Paper Series
- Publisher
- SAE International
- Published
- 2000-03-06
- Volume
- 1
- ISSN
- 0148-7191 (ISSN-L)
- 2688-3627
- OpenAlex
- W1597047783
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Keywords
- condensate drainage, surface tension, air-side heat transfer, dip test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review