Cited by 39Heat Transfer and OptimizationRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesHeat Transfer Mechanisms

Effect of inlet humidity condition on the air-side performance of an inclined brazed aluminum evaporator

Kim, Man-Hoe, Song, Sumin, Bullard, Clark W.·2002·International Journal of Refrigeration

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-7007(01)00061-5

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M.-H., Song, S., & Bullard, C. W.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Man-Hoe
Venue
International Journal of Refrigeration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
611-620
ISSN
0140-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007617224
Cited by
39
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Refrigeration (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
Keywords
evaporator, air-side heat transfer, pressure drop, inlet humidity, relative humidity, louver angle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review