Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Review of the Severity Index

Versace, John·1971·SAE Technical Paper Series

Abstract

The SAE Severity Index is supposed to be an approximation to tolerance limit data, but there are incongruities in its derivation which renders the formula unsupportable. The same logic on which the Severity Index appears to be based can be used to support a wide range of possible values for the exponent on the acceleration, including infinity. This inconsistency results because necessary distinctions have not been made between: the formula for a fitted approximation to the tolerance limit data, the scaling of severity as such, and the measure of the acceleration magnitude of a pulse, the “effective acceleration.” It is recommended that a formula which more literally follows from the tolerance limit data be adopted. In the long run, however, it is believed that a much more appropriate measure of injury severity would result from processing head impact data in such a way as to reflect the probable degree of brain injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4271/710881

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
Versace, J.
Venue
SAE Technical Paper Series
Published
1971-02-01
Volume
1
ISSN
  • 0148-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2688-3627
OpenAlex
W1599599357
Cited by
587
References
0
FWCI
2.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of the Severity Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4271/710881
The paper
Versace, J. (1971). A Review of the Severity Index. SAE Technical Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.4271/710881

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.