Cited by 2Cocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesSpace Exploration and Technology

Sweetpotato Growth Using a Microporous Tube System with Lunar Simulant Medium

Aglan, H., Mortley, D., Trotman, A., Loretan, P., Hill, W.·1998·SAE Technical Paper Series

Abstract

Several plant growth systems have been tested for crop production in microgravity and lunar/Mars environments in support of NASA's Advanced Life Support Program and long-term human space missions. These systems have incorporated such design features as the nutrient film technique (NFT), microporous plates, microporous tubes, and expandable boundary chambers and have been developed and used to support sweetpotato production at Tuskegee University. In the present research, the performance of different sweetpotato cultivars in a microporous tube system with lunar simulant medium was studied. The lunar simulant is an inert aggregate with an average particle size of about 3 mm. Buried in this solid medium is a microporous tube. Nutrient solution is circulated through the microporous tube under a slight negative pressure. This pressure is controlled to allow a slight seepage from the tube with some accumulation of water in the solid medium, but no free water. A moisture sensor controls the desired flow rate of nutrient solution by adjusting a check valve to adjust the nutrient solution return to the reservoir in the system. The growth of two sweetpotato breeding lines and one cultivar (TU-155, NC58 and Georgia Jet) were studied and compared in the system. Preliminary observations indicate that storage root yields were highest with NC58 followed by TU-155 and then Georgia Jet. In contrast, vine length was the longest for Georgia Jet, followed by NC58 then TU-155. However, internode lengths were similar for the three cultivars. The system with its accessories is very simple to assemble and operated trouble-free for the 100+ days of a sweetpotato plant's growth cycle. Replicated experiments continue in order to test system performance in controlled environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4271/981806

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aglan, H., Mortley, D., Trotman, A., Loretan, P., & Hill, W.
Affiliations
Tuskegee University (US)
Venue
SAE Technical Paper Series
Published
1998-07-13
Volume
1
ISSN
  • 0148-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2688-3627
OpenAlex
W1517461833
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
10.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Horticulture › Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
Ipomoea batatas, lunar regolith simulant, lunar regolith, plant growth in space, closed-loop life support, bioregenerative life support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review