The Potential for Lunar and Martian Regolith Simulants to Sustain Plant Growth: A Multidisciplinary Overview
Open accessAbstract
Bioregenerative life support systems (BLSS) are conceived of and developed so as to provide food sources for crewed missions to the Moon or Mars. The in situ resource utilization (ISRU) approach aims to reduce terrestrial input into a BLSS by using native regoliths and recycled organic waste as primary resources. The combination of BLSS and ISRU may allow sustainable food production on Moon and Mars. This task poses several challenges, including the effects of partial gravity, the limited availability of oxygen and water, and the self-sustaining management of resources. Lunar and Martian regoliths are not available on Earth; therefore, space research studies are conducted on regolith simulants that replicate the physicochemical properties of extra-terrestrial regoliths (as assessed in situ by previous missions). This review provides an overview of the physicochemical properties and mineralogical composition of commercially available Lunar and Martian regolith simulants. Subsequently, it describes potential strategies and sustainable practices for creating regolith simulants akin to terrestrial soil, which is a highly dynamic environment where microbiota and humified organic matter interact with the mineral moiety. These strategies include the amendment of simulants with composted organic wastes, which can turn nutrient-poor and alkaline crushed rocks into efficient life-sustaining substrates equipped with enhanced physical, hydraulic, and chemical properties. In this regard, we provide a comprehensive analysis of recent scientific works focusing on the exploitation of regolith simulant-based substrates as plant growth media. The literature discussion helps identify the main critical aspects and future challenges related to sustainable space farming by the in situ use and enhancement of Lunar and Martian resources.
Verified 2026-11-03 · 1 reference not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review assesses Lunar and Martian regolith simulants as substrates for plant growth in bioregenerative life support and in situ resource utilization scenarios. It concludes that pure simulants can supply some nutrients but generally lack organic matter and key nutrients such as N, P, and S, and often have unfavorable alkaline, physical, and hydrological properties that require amendment or other treatment.
Key findings
- Across 30 simulants (11 Lunar Mare, 6 Lunar Highlands, 4 Lunar Dust, 9 Martian), no universal simulant exists; mineralogies are heterogeneous, simulants often lack minor/rare phases, and none contain moisture or biological components.
- Bulk chemistry shows SiO₂ at ∼45% in Lunar simulants and ∼41% in Martian simulants; Lunar simulants have higher Al₂O₃ and CaO, while Martian simulants have higher Fe and MgO. Simulants contain K, P, S, and Mn but lack N; pH is above 6 and alkaline in some cases, and the only EC data for Martian simulants are 0.2–0.3 dS m⁻¹. Martian surface perchlorates occur at 0.5–1%, but were absent from all 30 simulants.
- Plant experiments show limitations: Wamelink et al. (2014) grew 14 species on JSC-1A Martian and JSC1-1A Lunar simulants without fertilizers; neither was an adequate nutrient source, Martian simulant outperformed Lunar, tomato and wheat performed well, three species flowered, and only two produced seeds. Wamelink et al. (2019) grew 10 crops with organic residues and nutrient solution, harvested edible parts of 9/10, found biomass highest in Earth control and Martian simulant but significantly lower in Lunar simulant, and only radish, rye, and cress produced seeds.
- Organic amendment improves simulants: compost addition to MMS-1 lowered bulk density from 1.39 g cm⁻³ (pure simulant) to 0.60 g cm⁻³ (pure compost); a 70:30 simulant:compost mixture was best for lettuce hydraulic properties, while red Salanova lettuce in 30:70 showed best crop performance and quality, with 70:30 showing slight decline but greater resource-use sustainability. Gilrain et al. (1999) found compost:simulant ratios 1:0, 3:1, and 1:1 yielded more than 1:3 and 0:1, but overall growth was still lower. Ramírez et al. (2019) tested 65 potato genotypes in Mars-like soil with EC 19.3–52.6 dS m⁻¹; only 40% survived and yielded 0.3–5.2 g tuber plant⁻¹. Eichler et al. (2021) found perchlorate-enriched simulants could not sustain plant growth even with nutrients; JSC-Mars-1A and MMS supported growth with nutrients, but MGS-1 did not due to high alkalinity.
Methods
- Narrative review consulting 74 scientific papers and 10 technical reports on Lunar and Martian regolith simulants published between 1970 and 2021.
- Selected 30 simulants from the Planetary Simulant Database whose petrographic/mineralogical and chemical characteristics were described in 27 scientific papers; categorized as 11 Lunar Mare, 6 Lunar Highlands, 4 Lunar Dust, and 9 Martian simulants.
- Synthesized physicochemical and mineralogical properties, bulk chemistry, hydrological properties, and prior plant-growth experiments; no new primary experimental data were generated.
Limitations
- Stated: no standardized method exists for evaluating regolith efficacy, and many published studies claiming to assess regolith for plant growth used microbiome-contaminated regolith, which is effectively soil. No universal simulant exists; simulants often lack minor/rare phases and contain no moisture or biological components. pH and EC are not provided in the Planetary Simulant Database. No samples have been returned from Mars, and only minimal Lunar material is available on Earth. Commercial simulant documentation can be inadequate, as shown by discrepancies between measured and producer-provided bulk chemistry for MMS-1.
- Stated future challenges: lack of adequate knowledge about the extra-terrestrial environment and best agronomic practices; water management and recycling under microgravity; effects of space environment on plant physiology; and perchlorate remediation for Martian regolith.
- Evident from the text and Table 2: plant-growth experiments vary widely in species, propagation material, sterilization, nutrient supply, crop cycle, and simulant type, limiting direct comparability; the review is narrative and does not perform a quantitative meta-analysis.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
30 of 100 cited sources checked · 16 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In Wamelink et al. (2019), only three species (radish, rye, and cress) produced seeds.
“Only three species (radish, rye, and cress) produced seeds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wamelink et al., 2019 source
Section 2.5 says seeds were harvested from radish, rye, and cress for the germination experiment, but that does not mean they were the only species to produce seeds. The Discussion also says tomato and pea formed fruit and viable seeds, contrary to the claim’s “only three.” (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Jones and Or (1999) reported a decrease in unsaturated hydraulic conductivities in microgravity.
“The authors also reported a decrease in unsaturated hydraulic conductivities, which can be explained by the modified hydrodynamics in microgravity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones and Or (1999) source
- Findingcitation
Jones and Or (1999) showed that the retention curve has narrower pore-size distributions in microgravity.
“By simulating a wetting and drying cycle using conventional unsaturated flow models adapted to microgravity, Jones and Or (1999) showed that the retention curve has narrower pore-size distributions in microgravity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones and Or (1999) source
- Premisecitation
The provision of terrestrial resources to permanent extra-terrestrial human settlements is not economically sustainable.
“The provision of terrestrial resources to permanent extra-terrestrial human settlements is not economically sustainable (Verseux et al., 2016), not only because of the high cost and resource/energy requirements, but also due to the difficulty and time needed to plan and execute launches (Llorente et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Verseux et al., 2016 source
The Introduction says that sending all needed resources from Earth to sustain long-term human bases on Mars does not seem financially sustainable. The cited paper addresses Mars, however, so it does not establish the same conclusion for permanent settlements at all extra-terrestrial locations. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Llorente et al., 2018 source
Section 1 describes the enormous logistical costs of launching and resupplying resources from Earth, and the resources and energy needed to sustain extraterrestrial greenhouses. It does not say that the difficulty or time required to plan and execute launches is a reason, so that part of the explanation attributed to Llorente et al. is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Toxic perchlorate salts occur commonly on the Martian surface in concentrations of 0.5-1%.
“Due to the phytochemistry of the cold and oxidizing environment, toxic perchlorate salts occur commonly on the Martian surface in concentrations of 0.5-1% (Oze et al., 2021); however, they were not present in any of the 30 simulants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Oze et al., 2021 source
The Introduction reports perchlorate wherever landers and rovers have explored and describes it as detrimental to plant growth. It says concentrations vary by location and depth, reaching as high as 2 wt.%; Section 2.1 identifies 0.5 and 1 wt.% as concentrations added in experiments, not as a commonly observed Martian range. The Introduction discusses possible atmospheric chemical origins, but does not attribute perchlorate formation to phytochemistry. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The Martian surface is covered by a basaltic sand that is mainly composed of plagioclases and mafic minerals.
“The surface is covered by a basaltic sand that is mainly composed of plagioclases and mafic minerals (including nesosilicates and inosilicates such as olivine and pyroxene) (Peters et al., 2008;Zeng et al., 2015;Filiberto, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Peters et al., 2008 source
- cites Zeng et al., 2015 source
The Target simulant and raw material selection section says the Martian surface is dominated by basaltic soil composed primarily of plagioclase, pyroxene, and olivine. The Comparison with Martian soil section says much of the surface is covered by unconsolidated soils. The paper does not establish that this material is specifically sand or that it covers the entire surface. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Filiberto, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Data from rovers show low variability in bulk chemical composition of regolith in the areas where measurements have been acquired.
“The data from rovers show low variability in bulk chemical composition of regolith in the areas where measurements have been acquired (Zeng et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeng et al., 2015 source
- Premisecitation
In Wamelink et al. (2019), radish germination rates were lower in the Lunar simulant than in the Earth control soil and Martian simulant.
“Radish germination rates were lower in the Lunar simulant than in the Earth control soil and Marian simulant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wamelink et al., 2019 source
Section 3.2 reports significantly higher radish-seed germination for seeds grown in Earth soil than for those grown in Moon soil simulant. It does not state that the Moon-simulant rate was lower than the Mars-simulant rate; it says the Mars rate was not significantly different from either. The Mars comparison is therefore not established by the text of our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The particle size distributions of Lunar and Martian simulants must be modified to create an optimal particle assemblage that promotes air permeability and geochemical and mechanical interactions to enhance element bioavailability.
“The particle size distributions of Lunar and Martian simulants must be modified to create an optimal particle assemblage (Cannon et al., 2019) that promotes air permeability (to avoid anoxia stress) and geochemical and mechanical interactions to enhance element bioavailability (Beegle et al., 2007;Zeng et al., 2015;Cannon et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Cannon et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Beegle et al., 2007
- cites Zeng et al., 2015 source
The Production of JMSS-1 section says its grain-size distribution was adjusted by sieving, and Target simulant and raw material selection specifies particle-size, chemical, and mechanical criteria for a Martian simulant. The paper does not say that this adjustment promotes air permeability or geochemical and mechanical interactions that enhance element bioavailability; it does not address lunar simulants. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Walkinshaw and Johnson (1971) found a direct interaction between plant species and Fe, Al, and Ti uptake from the Lunar substrate.
“The results showed a direct interaction between plant species and Fe, Al, and Ti uptake from the Lunar substrate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Walkinshaw and Johnson, 1971 source
- Premisecitation
Wamelink et al. (2014) found that neither the JSC1-1A Lunar nor the JSC-1A Martian simulant was an adequate source of plant nutrients.
“The results indicated that neither simulant was an adequate source of plant nutrients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wamelink et al., 2014 source
- Premisecitation
Organic amendment improved the physical properties of the simulant (such as bulk density and water holding capacity).
“As reported above in Section 2.3, organic amendment improved the physical properties of the simulant (such as bulk density and water holding capacity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The Curiosity rover investigations at Gale crater on Mars discovered indigenous N in sedimentary and aeolian deposits.
“It is also worth noting that the Curiosity rover investigations at Gale crater on Mars discovered indigenous N in sedimentary and aeolian deposits (Stern et al., 2015), although its exact concentration and potential use for plant growth is debatable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Stern et al., 2015 source
- Premisecitation
MMS-1 was found to be a coarse-textured alkaline substrate mostly composed of plagioclase, amorphous material, and (to a lesser degree) zeolite, hematite, and smectites.
“MMS-1 was found to be a coarse-textured alkaline substrate mostly composed of plagioclase, amorphous material, and (to a lesser degree) of zeolite, hematite, and smectites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
The mineralogical compositions of only 11 Lunar simulants have been characterized.
“As shown analytically (Supplementary Table S1) and synthetically (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S2), the mineralogical compositions of only 11 Lunar simulants have been characterized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Simulants comprised of the majority of minerals found in Lunar and Martian surficial regoliths often lack some minor or rare phases (including phosphates, sulfides, and phyllosilicates) that affect ISRU and plant growth.
“However, simulants comprised of the majority of minerals found in Lunar and Martian surficial regoliths often lack some minor or rare phases (including phosphates, sulfides, and phyllosilicates) that affect ISRU and plant growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
There is no universal simulant that comprehensively represents the mineralogy of the Lunar and Martian surfaces.
“There is no universal simulant that comprehensively represents the mineralogy of the Lunar and Martian surfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Perchlorates were not present in any of the 30 simulants.
“Due to the phytochemistry of the cold and oxidizing environment, toxic perchlorate salts occur commonly on the Martian surface in concentrations of 0.5-1% (Oze et al., 2021); however, they were not present in any of the 30 simulants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The water and nutrient leaching of soil was reduced by 90% under Martian gravity.
“The water and nutrient leaching of soil was reduced by 90% under Martian gravity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maggi and Pallud (2010) source
- Findingcitation
No existing simulants contain moisture or biological components.
“In any case, no existing simulants contain moisture or biological components (Gertsch et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gertsch et al., 2008
- Findingcitation
In the absence of any organic matter, the main chemical compositions and mineralogy of Lunar and Martian simulants are very similar to those of their respective reference samples from the Lunar and Martian surfaces.
“In the absence of any organic matter, the main chemical compositions and mineralogy of Lunar and Martian simulants are very similar to those of their respective reference samples from the Lunar and Martian surfaces (Mortley et al., 2000;Beegle et al., 2007;Peters et al., 2008;Zeng et al., 2015;Kölbl et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation
Bulk density progressively decreased with increasing rates of compost in the mixture, ranging from 1.39 g cm-3 (pure simulant) to 0.60 g cm-3 (pure compost).
“As expected, the bulk density progressively decreased with increasing rates of compost in the mixture, ranging from 1.39 g cm -3 (pure simulant) to 0.60 g cm -3 (pure compost).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al. (2020) source
- Findingcitation
The addition of compost to pure simulant proportionally increased the maximum amount of water retained.
“The addition of compost to pure simulant proportionally increased the maximum amount of water retained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al. (2020) source
- Findingreasoning
If the objective is to manage lettuce irrigation to minimize irrigation frequency, the 70:30 mixture was the most promising substrate due to its hydraulic properties.
“However, if the objective is to manage lettuce irrigation to minimize irrigation frequency, the 70:30 mixture was the most promising substrate due to its hydraulic properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al. (2020) source
- Findingcitation
The addition of green compost to the MMS-1 simulant affects the physical and hydrological properties of the mixture.
“This study showed how the addition of green compost to the MMS-1 simulant affects the physical and hydrological properties of the mixture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al. (2020) source
- Findingcitation
Compost addition to the pure simulant exerted a more significant effect on the macropore region than on the micropore domain.
“The authors also showed that compost addition to the pure simulant exerted a more significant effect on the macropore region than on the micropore domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al. (2020) source
- Findingcitation
In terms of water and nutrient transport processes, all the mixtures were acceptable as growth media in a hydroponic cultivation system.
“In terms of water and nutrient transport processes, all the mixtures were acceptable as growth media in a hydroponic cultivation system, where a timely water supply is guaranteed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al. (2020) source
- Premisenone given
Plants generally take up only the bioavailable forms of elements, and not the elements occluded in mineral structures that are released only after mineral weathering.
“However, plants generally take up only the bioavailable forms of elements (such as the readily soluble and exchangeable forms), and not the elements occluded in mineral structures that are released only after mineral weathering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Lunar regolith is a mixture of varying amounts of two primary rocks: Lunar Mare dark basalt and lighter feldspar-rich anorthosite of the Lunar Highlands, mixed with an approximately constant proportion of impact melt glass.
“Samples brought back to Earth by the Apollo missions at the end of the 1970s revealed that the Lunar regolith was a mixture of varying amounts of two primary rocks: 1) the Lunar Mare dark basalt and 2) the lighter-colored, feldspar-rich anorthosite of the Lunar Highlands.These are mixed with an approximately constant proportion of impact melt glass (McKay et al., 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McKay et al., 1994
- Interpretationreasoning
The total amount of the most essential elements may be more than adequate to satisfy the requirements for plant growth in simulants.
“The total amount of the most essential elements may be more than adequate to satisfy the requirements for plant growth in simulants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Factors such as pH, redox potential, electrical conductivity, texture, type and relative abundance of fine solid particles play a key role in regulating nutrient availability in a plant growth medium.
“Factors such as pH, redox potential, electrical conductivity (EC), texture, type and relative abundance of fine solid particles play a key role in regulating nutrient availability in a plant growth medium (Adamo et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adamo et al., 2018 source
- Premisereasoning
In microgravity, capillary forces exert complete control over liquid distribution in a plant growth medium.
“In microgravity, capillary forces exert complete control over liquid distribution in a plant growth medium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Even with exogenous addition of deficient minerals, it is difficult to replicate all regolith characteristics in a single simulant.
“However, even with this addition, it is difficult to replicate all regolith characteristics in a single simulant (Seiferlin et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seiferlin et al., 2008 source
- Premisereasoning
For plants, nutrient availability in soil is governed by the pseudo-equilibrium between aqueous and solid phases, rather than by the total nutrient content.
“For plants, nutrient availability in soil is governed by the pseudo-equilibrium between aqueous and solid phases, rather than by the total nutrient content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The primary function of pioneer plants with associated microorganisms is to form a soil with adequate fertility.
“The primary function of the pioneer plants with associated microorganisms is to form a soil with adequate fertility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kozyrovska et al., 2006 source
- Premisecitation
The simulants contained specific root-colonizing bacteria that could decompose the Lunar silicate rock and release the cations essential for plant growth.
“The simulants contained specific root-colonizing bacteria that could decompose the Lunar silicate rock and release the cations essential for plant growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kozyrovska et al., 2006 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Particle interactions or aggregation and the consequent formation of a structured substrate are critical for better plant growth.
“Therefore, particle interactions or aggregation and the consequent formation of a structured substrate are critical for better plant growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Walkinshaw et al. (1970) noted the absence of disease agents in the plants tested under experimental conditions.
“The authors noted the absence of disease agents in the plants tested under experimental conditions, and concluded that the Lunar material could potentially support the growth of a wide range of plant species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walkinshaw et al., 1970 source
- Premisecitation
The fluxes of water, air, and nutrients in a growth substrate are closely linked to its physicochemical properties.
“The fluxes of water, air, and nutrients in a growth substrate are closely linked to its physicochemical properties (McFee and VanScoyoc, 1975).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McFee and VanScoyoc, 1975 source
- Premisecitation
Ferns, liverworts, and tobacco were particularly effective in exploiting Lunar material as a nutrient source.
“Specifically, ferns, liverworts, and tobacco were particularly effective in exploiting the Lunar material as a nutrient source.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walkinshaw et al., 1970 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Regolith simulants cannot support sustainable ISRU for crop production without exogenous inputs of inorganic fertilizers or organic matter.
“Thus, regolith simulants cannot support sustainable ISRU for crop production without exogenous inputs of inorganic fertilizers or organic matter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Lunar and Martian regolith simulants are adequate analogues for actual Lunar and Martian regolith in plant growth studies.
- Interpretationreasoning
The suitability of a substrate for the cultivation of a candidate crop cannot be established solely through analysis of the retention curve.
“However, the suitability of a substrate for the cultivation of a candidate crop cannot be established solely through analysis of the retention curve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
None of the three pure Martian regolith simulants tested by Eichler et al. (2021) could support plant growth in the absence of nutrient supplementation.
“None of these simulants could support plant growth in the absence of nutrient supplementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eichler et al., 2021 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Adding in situ recycled organic matter to enrich regolith simulants is a sustainable and effective technique to enhance the chemical and biological fertility and physical and hydraulic properties of regolith-based substrates (e.g., permeability and water retention).
“This is a sustainable and effective technique to enhance the chemical and biological fertility and physical and hydraulic properties of regolith-based substrates (e.g., permeability and water retention).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In situ recycled organic matter can be produced in sufficient quantity and quality in BLSS to amend regolith.
- Premisecitation
The use of organic amendment and soil tillage can help mitigate the effects of microgravity on water leaching.
“The use of this amendment and soil tillage can also help mitigate the effects of microgravity on water leaching (Maggi and Pallud, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maggi and Pallud, 2010 source
- Premisecitation
Weete et al. (1972) found that tissue grown in contact with Lunar material had a higher concentration of total sterols than in the control.
“Weete et al. (1972) found that tissue grown in contact with Lunar material had a higher concentration of total sterols than in the control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weete et al., 1972
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The configuration of a mineral-rich and fertile biological substrate for edible plant growth based on regolith simulants still presents a challenge in space biology research.
“Hence, the configuration of a mineral-rich and fertile biological substrate for edible plant growth based on regolith simulants still presents a challenge in space biology research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Consecutive cycles of plant cultivation on the same regolith-based substrate can allow prolonged root exudation and the release of organic acid molecules and CO2.
“Moreover, consecutive cycles of plant cultivation on the same regolith-based substrate can allow prolonged root exudation and the release of organic acid molecules and CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Caporale et al. (2020) found discrepancies between the measured bulk chemistry of the MMS-1 simulant and that provided by the producer.
“The study by Caporale et al. (2020) found discrepancies between the measured bulk chemistry of the MMS-1 simulant and that provided by the producer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al., 2020 source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
- May combine two claims. 57
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is some evidence of a biofilm in Lunar and Martian soils.
“although there is some evidence of a biofilm (Thomas-Keprta et al., 2014;Eigenbrode et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Thomas-Keprta et al., 2014 source
- cites Eigenbrode et al., 2018 source
The main text (p. 9) says the detected organic matter has no clearly identified source: biological, geological, and meteoritic origins are all possible. It does not present the material as evidence of a biofilm, and it reports no findings about lunar soil. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSpace farming based on local resource exploitation is a promising strategy for food production on extra-terrestrial habitats, as it can allow water recycling, organic waste composting, and oxygen production or CO2 consumption.
“Space farming based on local resource exploitation (Maggi and Pallud, 2010;Ramírez et al., 2019) is a promising strategy for food production (Ming and Henninger, 1989) on extra-terrestrial habitats, as it can allow water recycling, organic waste composting, and oxygen production or CO 2 consumption (Verseux et al., 2016;Llorente et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationStudies report that Martian and Lunar simulants have a pH above 6, and have alkaline properties in some cases, suggesting low rates of mineral weathering and cation release.
“Studies report that the Martian and Lunar simulants have a pH above 6, and have alkaline properties in some cases (Gilrain et al., 1999;Zaets et al., 2011;Wamelink et al., 2014;Caporale et al., 2020;Eichler et al., 2021), suggesting low rates of mineral weathering and cation release.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost existing simulants were developed to address specific application fields, and their agricultural properties have rarely been evaluated.
“Most existing simulants were developed to address specific application fields, and although their chemical interactions or properties related to mechanical abrasion have been assessed to mitigate potential risks (Rickman et al., 2013), their agricultural properties have rarely been evaluated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rickman et al., 2013 source
The Abstract says simulants are tested to mitigate risks to lunar-surface equipment and compared by physical properties and bulk chemistry. It does not establish that most simulants were developed for specific applications or that chemical interactions and abrasion properties have been assessed. The statement about rarely evaluated agricultural properties follows the citation and is not clearly attributed to Rickman et al. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Wamelink et al. (2014), three species flowered, but only two produced seeds.
“Three species flowered, but only two produced seeds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wamelink et al., 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Wamelink et al. (2019), biomass production was highest in the Earth control and the Martian soil simulant, but was significantly lower in the Lunar simulant.
“The biomass production was highest in the Earth control and the Martian soil simulant, but was significantly lower in the Lunar simulant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wamelink et al., 2019 source
Section 3.1 (Fruit setting and biomass) reports that total aboveground biomass was highest in the Earth control and lowest in the Moon simulant, with Moon dry biomass significantly below Earth (p=0.0318). It also states that Mars biomass was not significantly different from either Earth or Moon, so the claim is unsupported if it implies a significant Mars–Moon difference. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Ramírez et al. (2019), only 40% of the potato genotypes survived and yielded crops (0.3-5.2 g tuber plant−1).
“Only 40% of the genotypes survived and yielded crops (0.3-5.2 g tuber plant -1 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramírez et al., 2019 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral simulant properties-such as an alkaline pH, a high availability of sodium, the predominance of macro- vs. micropores, and a scant water holding capacity-can influence plant growth, health, and vigor in extra-terrestrial farming.
“For extra-terrestrial farming, it is wellestablished that several simulant properties-such as an alkaline pH, a high availability of sodium, the predominance of macro-vs.micropores, and a scant water holding capacity-can influence plant growth, health, and vigor (Wamelink et al., 2014;Caporale et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Wamelink et al., 2014 source
The Discussion (page not provided) says that higher water-holding capacity may explain better growth in Mars simulant and that high pH may explain poor growth in moon simulant. The Conclusions likewise identify pH and moisture retention as possible factors. Our copy does not establish high sodium availability or a predominance of macropores over micropores as influences on plant growth. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Caporale et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Martian simulant outperformed the Lunar simulant in biomass production in Wamelink et al. (2014), as it had trace levels of ammonium nitrate and carbon and no stressors that could cause a higher pH or low water holding capacity.
“Nevertheless, the Martian simulant outperformed the Lunar simulant in biomass production, as it had trace levels of ammonium nitrate and carbon and no stressors that could cause a higher pH or low water holding capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wamelink et al., 2014 source
The Results report higher biomass on the Martian simulant, and the Discussion says its greater water-holding capacity may explain its better performance. Table 2 reports ammonium, nitrate/nitrite, carbon and a lower pH for the Martian simulant than for the lunar one. The paper does not establish that those nutrients caused the biomass difference or that the Martian simulant had no stressors; its explanation is tentative. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Martian surface has been found to have a high salt concentration and high levels of perchlorates.
“For instance, the Martian surface has been found to have a high salt concentration (Ramírez et al., 2019) and high levels of perchlorates (Eichler et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough MMS-1 was a source of nutrients for lettuce, it did not supply organic matter, N, and S, and provided very scant amounts of P.
“Although it was a source of nutrients for lettuce, it did not supply organic matter, N, and S, and provided very scant amounts of P.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCabbage and Brussels sprouts exhibited higher absorption of Mn.
“Notably, cabbage and Brussels sprouts exhibited higher absorption of Mn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Walkinshaw and Johnson, 1971 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOrganic amendment lowered the pH of the alkaline simulant, enhanced its cation exchange capacity, organic C and N levels, and the availability of macro- and micronutrients.
“It also lowered the pH of the alkaline simulant, enhanced its cation exchange capacity, organic C and N levels, and the availability of macro-and micronutrients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Caporale et al., 2020 source
- cites Duri et al., 2020 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports greater availability of several nutrients in compost-rich substrates and mentions the cation exchange capacity of compost. It does not report that amendment lowered the simulant’s pH or increased the substrate’s cation exchange capacity, organic C, or N levels; nor does it establish increased availability of micronutrients as a group. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPlants produce O2 and fix CO2, serve as food for space crews, have a role in water recycling, and are actively involved in soil structure formation.
“Plants produce O 2 and fix CO 2 , serve as food for space crews, have a role in water recycling (Maggi and Pallud, 2010;Llorente et al., 2018), and are actively involved in soil structure formation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe red Salanova lettuce grown in the 30:70 simulant:compost mixture showed the best crop performance, photosynthetic activity, intrinsic water use efficiency, and quality traits (mineral, carotenoid, and phenolic contents).
“The red Salanova ® lettuce grown in the 30:70 mixture showed the best crop performance, photosynthetic activity, intrinsic water use efficiency, and quality traits (mineral, carotenoid, and phenolic contents).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Caporale et al., 2020 source
- cites Duri et al., 2020 source
Results §2.1 reports that red Salanova in the 30:70 simulant:compost mixture had the highest fresh yield, net CO₂ assimilation and intrinsic water-use efficiency. But the claim that this mixture also had the best mineral, carotenoid and phenolic contents overstates the findings: Results §2.3 places the highest lutein content in the 70:30 mixture, while Results §§2.2 and 2.4 show that mineral and phenolic contents varied by nutrient or compound, with some highest in 100% compost. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSiO2 is the principal constituent in all simulants; levels are consistently about 45% in Lunar simulants and about 41% in Martian ones.
“SiO 2 is the principal constituent in all the simulants.SiO 2 levels are consistently ∼45% in the Lunar simulants, and ∼41% in the Martian ones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenLunar Highland simulants contain higher levels of anorthite plagioclases than Lunar Mare simulants (59 vs. 34%, respectively).
“However, Lunar Highland simulants contain higher levels of anorthite plagioclases than Lunar Mare simulants (59 vs. 34%, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
FindingreasoningSimulants lack key nutrients for plants such as N, which is frequently absent in minerals and occurs in biomolecules.
“Simulants lack key nutrients for plants such as N, which is frequently absent in minerals and occurs in biomolecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationSimulants contain non-negligible amounts of sodium (Lunar: 2.8% of Na2O; Martian: 2.4% from Na-plagioclases) and potentially toxic elements (e.g., Cr as Cr2O3), which may induce salt or other abiotic stresses in rhizosphere-competent microorganisms and plants.
“Simulants also contain non-negligible amounts of sodium (Lunar: 2.8% of Na 2 O; Martian: 2.4% from Na-plagioclases) and potentially toxic elements (e.g., Cr as Cr 2 O 3 ), which may induce salt or other abiotic stresses in rhizosphere-competent microorganisms and plants (Caporale et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationChamindu Deepagoda et al. (2014) concluded that the Lunar simulant was the worst in terms of water retention capacity, likely because of its large pore space (0.52 cm3 cm-3) and particle size (0.25-1.0 mm).
“Their analysis concluded that the Lunar simulant was the worst in terms of water retention capacity, likely because of its large pore space (0.52 cm 3 cm -3 ) and particle size (0.25-1.0 mm).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chamindu Deepagoda et al. (2014) source
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOn average, compared to Lunar Highland simulants, Lunar Mare simulants are more enriched with mafic minerals (7 vs. 35%, respectively) and oxides (0.2 vs. 2.9%, respectively).
“On average, compared to Lunar Highland simulants, Lunar Mare simulants are more enriched with mafic minerals (7 vs. 35%, respectively) and oxides (0.2 vs. 2.9%, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningLunar and Martian simulants contain significant levels of other nutrients essential for plant growth: K (average, 0.9%; 0.7% of K2O), P (0.3%; 0.3% of P2O5), S (0.1%; 4.4% of SO3), and Mn (0.1%; 0.1% of MnO).
“Lunar and Martian simulants also contain significant levels of other nutrients essential for plant growth.These include potassium (average, 0.9%; 0.7% of K 2 O), phosphorus (0.3%; 0.3% of P 2 O 5 ), sulfur (0.1%; 4.4% of SO 3 ), and manganese (0.1%; 0.1% of MnO), which are derived from K-feldspars, phosphates, sulfates, and Mn oxides, respectively (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe Lunar Dust simulant is enriched by glass and opaque than the Lunar Mare and Lunar Highland simulants (53 vs. 25% and 33%, respectively), and exhibits lower levels of nesosilicates, inosilicates, and tectosilicates.
“In accordance with the mineralogy of the Lunar dust regolith, the Lunar Dust simulant is enriched by glass and opaque than the Lunar Mare and Lunar Highland simulants (53 vs. 25% and 33%, respectively), and exhibits lower levels of nesosilicates, inosilicates, and tectosilicates (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe only data regarding EC in Martian simulants indicate low values of 0.2-0.3 dS m-1, suggesting no adverse effect of salinity on plant growth.
“The only data regarding EC in Martian simulants indicate low values of 0.2-0.3dS m -1 (Gilrain et al., 1999;Caporale et al., 2020), suggesting no adverse effect of salinity on plant growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSimulants contain inorganic carbon in the form of carbonates, and their levels are higher in Martian simulants than in Lunar ones.
“The simulants also contain inorganic carbon in the form of carbonates, and their levels are higher in Martian simulants than in Lunar ones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningLunar simulants show higher Al2O3 and CaO levels than Martian simulants, whereas the opposite is true for Fe and MgO.
“Likewise, Lunar simulants show higher Al 2 O 3 and CaO levels than Martian simulants, whereas the opposite is true for Fe (FeO and Fe 2 O 3 ) and MgO (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationUnder Martian gravity, microbial metabolism was enhanced, decomposition of DOC was faster, and emissions of NO, N2O, N2, and CO2 were much higher.
“This enhanced the microbial metabolism, promoted faster decomposition of DOC, and much higher emission of NO, N 2 O, N 2 , and CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maggi and Pallud (2010) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationBased on its hydraulic properties, the 70:30 mixture was the best substrate, as the percentage increase in large pores (diameter, 50-120 μm) was more significant in this mixture than in the 30:70 one.
“Based on its hydraulic properties, the 70:30 mixture was best substrate, as the percentage increase in large pores (diameter, 50-120 μm) was more significant in this mixture than in the 30:70 one.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al. (2020) source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWater held in macropores exceeding 120 μm in diameter was not directly beneficial for root water uptake in lettuce, and even caused root asphyxia.
“Water held in macropores exceeding 120 μm in diameter was not directly beneficial for root water uptake in lettuce (the plant considered in the study), and even caused root asphyxia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caporale et al. (2020) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Martian regolith is classified as a fine-grained and cohesionless rocky soil that is mixed with dust due to planet storms.
“Peters et al. (2008) reported that the Martian regolith is classified as a fine-grained and cohesionless rocky soil that is mixed with dust due to planet storms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peters et al. (2008) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRegolith simulants, although not sterile, may play an essential role in improving understanding of environmental phenomena on the Moon and Mars and help solve potential problems related to the exploitation of Lunar and Martian regolith as plant growth substrates.
“However, these regolith simulants, although not sterile, may play an essential role in improving our understanding of the environmental phenomena on the Moon and Mars.They may also help solve potential problems related to the exploitation of Lunar and Martian regolith as plant growth substrates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPotential future challenges include a lack of adequate knowledge about the extra-terrestrial environment and the development of best agronomic practices for the first space colony.
“Potential future challenges include a lack of adequate knowledge about the extra-terrestrial environment and the development of best agronomic practices for the first space colony.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDue to the lack of a standardized method for evaluating regolith efficacy, many published studies claiming to have assessed regolith for plant growth have used microbiome-contaminated regolith, which is in effect a soil.
“Due to the lack of a standardized method for evaluating regolith efficacy, many published studies claiming to have assessed regolith for plant growth have used microbiome-contaminated regolith, which is in effect a soil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe main critical aspects of space agriculture are presumed to be related to nutrient availability, air and fluid movements in different gravitational conditions, and potentially toxic elements in the substrates.
“The main critical aspects of space agriculture are presumed to be related to nutrient availability, air and fluid movements in different gravitational conditions, and potentially toxic elements in the substrates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPlant growth, morphology, and physiology on the Moon or other planets are expected to be greatly affected by the sterile and nutrient-poor nature of extra-terrestrial soil and the different gravitational and climatic conditions.
“Naturally, plant growth, morphology, and physiology on the Moon or other planets are expected to be greatly affected by the sterile and nutrient-poor nature of extra-terrestrial soil and the different gravitational and climatic conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPotentially toxic elements such as Al and Cr usually precipitate and are poorly available in alkaline environments; therefore, their presence in non-negligible amounts should not hinder plant growth in simulants.
“Potentially toxic elements such as Al and Cr usually precipitate and are poorly available in alkaline environments (Brautigan et al., 2012); therefore, their presence in non-negligible amounts should not hinder plant growth in simulants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brautigan et al., 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThere is only a minimal quantity of Lunar material on Earth that is closely guarded, and no samples have been brought back from Mars to date.
“Nevertheless, there is only a minimal quantity of Lunar material on Earth that is closely guarded, and no samples have been brought back from Mars to date.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenReduced gravity causes changes in crucial hydrological variables and alters some fundamental characteristics of water flow and liquid distribution inside a porous medium.
“Reduced gravity (e.g., in a spacecraft in orbit) causes changes in crucial hydrological variables and alters some fundamental characteristics of water flow and liquid distribution inside a porous medium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPerchlorates can be taken up by plants and make their edible parts unsafe to eat.
“Perchlorates can be taken up by plants and make their edible parts unsafe to eat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe combination of BLSS and ISRU may allow sustainable food production on the Moon and Mars.
“The combination of BLSS and ISRU may allow sustainable food production on Moon and Mars.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe addition of sustainable amounts of organic amendments or mineral fertilizers to Lunar and Martian simulants may enhance the bioavailability of essential nutrients and provide missing vital nutrients such as N and organic C.
“Thus, the addition of sustainable amounts of organic amendments (e.g., compost or manure) or mineral fertilizers to Lunar and Martian simulants may enhance the bioavailability of essential nutrients and provide missing vital nutrients such as N and organic C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationIn the absence of rigorous documentation by producers of simulants, there is a need for adequate characterization of commercial simulants prior to the designing and planning of any scientific experiments.
“In the absence of rigorous documentation by producers of simulants, this shows the need for an adequate characterization of commercial simulants prior to the designing and planning of any scientific experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMartian regolith sometimes contains toxic perchlorates.
“In addition, the Martian regolith sometimes contains toxic perchlorates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSelected pioneer plants can be grown initially to improve the root zone during cultivation and provide plant residues for humification at the end of their life cycle.
“Furthermore, selected pioneer plants can be grown initially (Kozyrovska et al., 2006) to improve the root zone during cultivation and provide plant residues for humification at the end of their life cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kozyrovska et al., 2006 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOrganic waste produced by BLSS crews can help recover compounds and allow their use as fertilizers or compost to support plant growth.
“The organic waste produced by BLSS crews can help recover compounds and allow their use as fertilizers or compost to support plant growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In situ recycled organic matter can be produced in sufficient quantity and quality in BLSS to amend regolith.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese simulants generally exhibit numerous features harmful for plant health, such as an alkaline pH, high availability of Na, low cohesion of mineral components, the predominance of macro- vs. micropores, and low water holding capacity.
“Furthermore, these simulants generally exhibit numerous features harmful for plant health, such as an alkaline pH, high availability of Na, low cohesion of mineral components, the predominance of macro-vs.micropores, and low water holding capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPure regolith simulants lack organic matter and key macronutrients such as N, P, and S.
“However, they lack organic matter and key macronutrients such as N, P, and S.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLunar and Martian simulants have been primarily studied for applications other than agronomy, although they have potential use as a substrate for crop growth.
“To date, Lunar and Martian simulants have been primarily studied for applications other than agronomy (de Vera et al., 2004;Gertsch et al., 2008;Kölbl et al., 2017;Karl et al., 2018), although they have potential use as a substrate for crop growth (Mortley et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn many studies, nutrient deficiency in simulants was overcome by fertigation with nutrient-rich solutions (e.g., Hoagland).
“In many studies, nutrient deficiency in simulants was overcome by fertigation with nutrient-rich solutions (e.g., Hoagland).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationReduced gravity can influence gas and fluid movement, but does not necessarily lead to better rhizospheric conditions.
“Although reduced gravity can influence gas and fluid movement, it does not necessarily lead to better rhizospheric conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAt the end of the growth cycle, Kozyrovska et al. (2006) demonstrated that first-generation plant residues could serve as a supply of green manure for humification and as a potential nutrient source.
“At the end of the growth cycle, the authors demonstrated that the first-generation plant residues could serve as a supply of green manure for humification and as a potential nutrient source.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kozyrovska et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations were higher in treated plants, with chlorophyll a being the major pigment present.
“Moreover, the chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations were higher in treated plants, with chlorophyll a being the major pigment present (Weete and Walkinshaw, 1972).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weete and Walkinshaw, 1972
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWith the addition of nutrients, both lettuce and Arabidopsis grew on JSC-Mars-1A and MMS, but did not grow on MGS-1.
“However, with the addition of nutrients, both plant species grew on JSC-Mars-1A and MMS, but did not grow on MGS-1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eichler et al., 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Gilrain et al. (1999), Swiss chard plants grown in compost:simulant ratios of 1:0, 3:1, and 1:1 showed yields greater than those in the 1:3 and 0:1 ratios, and control plants irrigated with only water produced similar trends.
“Plants grown in compost:simulant ratios of 1:0, 3:1, and 1:1 showed yields that were greater than those in the 1:3 and 0:1 ratios, and control plants irrigated with only water produced similar trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gilrain et al., 1999 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLunar and Martian soils lack organic matter and biotic activity.
“Lunar and Martian soils lack organic matter and biotic activity (Seiferlin et al., 2008), although there is some evidence of a biofilm (Thomas-Keprta et al., 2014;Eigenbrode et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seiferlin et al., 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWalkinshaw et al. (1970) concluded that Lunar material could potentially support the growth of a wide range of plant species.
“The authors noted the absence of disease agents in the plants tested under experimental conditions, and concluded that the Lunar material could potentially support the growth of a wide range of plant species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walkinshaw et al., 1970 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPlants need macro- and micronutrients for optimal growth, and these nutrients can be found in both inorganic and organic forms in soil on Earth.
“As reported in Section 2.2, plants need macro and micronutrients for optimal growth, and these can be found in both inorganic and organic forms in soil on Earth (Hopkins and Huner, 2008;Fageria, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hopkins and Huner, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Fageria, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAglan et al. (1998) and Mortley et al. (2000) concluded that both Lunar and Martian simulants showed potential for use as a substrate for crop production.
“Therefore, the authors concluded that both simulants showed potential for use as a substrate for crop production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCultivation on Mars would require less water for irrigation and lower external nutrient supply than on Earth.
“The authors concluded that cultivation on Mars would require less water for irrigation and lower external nutrient supply than on Earth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maggi and Pallud (2010) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe literature review showed that pure regolith simulants may be suitable media for plant growth (at least for limited periods) and function as a source of essential nutrients such as K, Ca, Mg, and Fe.
“The literature review showed that pure regolith simulants may be suitable media for plant growth (at least for limited periods) and function as a source of essential nutrients such as K, Ca, Mg, and Fe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Lunar and Martian regolith simulants are adequate analogues for actual Lunar and Martian regolith in plant growth studies.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe use of a stable organic amendment can supply organic carbon and improve the physical features of regolith.
“The first solution involves the use of a stable organic amendment, not only as a supply of organic carbon, but also to improve the physical features of regolith (Gilrain et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gilrain et al., 1999 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLunar and Martian soils, and therefore regolith simulant-based substrates, are potentially deficient in all macro- and micronutrients, which are derived exclusively (N), mostly (P, S), or partly (K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, B, Cl, and Ni) from the degradation of organic components.
“Thus, Lunar and Martian soils (and, therefore, regolith simulant-based substrates) are potentially deficient in all macro-and micronutrients, which are derived exclusively (N), mostly (P, S), or partly (K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, B, Cl, and Ni) from the degradation of organic components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Lunar and Martian regolith simulants are adequate analogues for actual Lunar and Martian regolith in plant growth studies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGilrain et al. (1999) concluded that compost mainly promoted plant growth by improving the physical features of the regolith that regulate water and/or nutrient availability.
“The authors concluded that the compost mainly promoted plant growth by improving the physical features of the regolith that regulate water and/or nutrient availability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gilrain et al., 1999 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn tests by Aglan et al. (1998) and Mortley et al. (2000), the simulants mainly provided mechanical anchorage for the plant roots and did not cause any adverse or toxic effects in the plants.
“In these tests, the simulants mainly provided mechanical anchorage for the plant roots, and did not cause any adverse or toxic effects in the plants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCarbon is absorbed from the atmosphere through photosynthesis, and organic matter is the primary source of both N and P.
“Carbon is absorbed from the atmosphere through photosynthesis (Hopkins and Huner, 2008), and organic matter is the primary source of both N and P.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hopkins and Huner, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisecitationCalcium perchlorate-enriched simulants were unable to sustain plant growth, even with nutrient supply.
“Calcium perchlorate-enriched simulants were unable to sustain plant growth, even with nutrient supply.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eichler et al., 2021 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFertigation with nutrient-rich solutions is not feasible and sustainable in space agriculture, as the nutritional resources must be carried from the Earth and cannot be produced in BLSS.
“However, this agronomic technique is not feasible and sustainable in space agriculture, as the nutritional resources must be carried from the Earth and cannot be produced in BLSS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough sustaining plant growth throughout the life cycle may be feasible for microgreens or salad crops, it is more challenging for other candidate species such as potato and soybean, which require more nutrients and resources to produce a sufficiently edible yield than do salad crops.
“Although this may be feasible for microgreens or salad crops, it is more challenging for other candidate species such as potato (a source of carbohydrates) and soybean (a source of proteins), which require more nutrients and resources to produce a sufficiently edible yield than do salad crops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn extra-terrestrial soil, water dynamics would regulate the extent of mineral weathering and the rate of organic matter decomposition, thus greatly affecting the biogeochemistry and bioavailability of nutrients and plant growth.
“In extra-terrestrial soil, water dynamics would regulate the extent of mineral weathering and the rate of organic matter decomposition, thus greatly affecting the biogeochemistry and bioavailability of nutrients and plant growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn sustainable scenarios of space farming, regolith-based substrates are required to sustain plant growth throughout the plant life cycle, including the complete seed maturation needed for reproduction.
“In sustainable scenarios of space farming, regolith-based substrates are required to sustain plant growth throughout the plant life cycle, including the complete seed maturation needed for reproduction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningProviding ecosystem services by using a regolith-based substrate might be the key to a fruitful and sustainable Lunar or Martian BLSS.
“Providing ecosystem services by using a regolith-based substrate might be the key to a fruitful and sustainable Lunar or Martian BLSS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningFurther steps-such as water rinses, phytoremediation, volatilization, and chemical reduction by using perchlorate-reducing bacteria-are necessary to make Mars regolith a viable growing substrate.
“Thus, further steps-such as water rinses, phytoremediation, volatilization, and chemical reduction by using perchlorate-reducing bacteria-are necessary to make Mars regolith a viable growing substrate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe presence of and interactions with biota (including pathogens, cyanobacteria, plant growth-promoting bacteria, beneficial symbiotic fungi, and worms) and biostimulants will add further complexity to life support systems with extraterrestrial soils.
“The presence of-and interactions with-biota (including pathogens, cyanobacteria, plant growth-promoting bacteria, beneficial symbiotic fungi, and worms) and biostimulants will add further complexity to life support systems with extraterrestrial soils.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis can lower the substrate pH, increase mineral weathering rates, enhance nutrient release/availability, promote the aggregation of particles of different sizes (to form a more efficient porous system), and overall contribute to soil improvement.
“This can lower the substrate pH, increase mineral weathering rates, enhance nutrient release/availability, promote the aggregation of particles of different sizes (to form a more efficient porous system), and overall contribute to soil improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe occurrence of perchlorates in the Mars regolith provides a significant challenge to its use as an agricultural substrate.
“The occurrence of perchlorates in the Mars regolith provides a significant challenge to its use as an agricultural substrate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Unexplored areas of the Lunar and Martian surfaces may exhibit different mineralogy and chemical compositions.
“Nevertheless, we need to assume that the unexplored areas of the Lunar and Martian surfaces may exhibit different mineralogy and chemical compositions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lunar and Martian regolith simulants are adequate analogues for actual Lunar and Martian regolith in plant growth studies.
“Thus, Lunar and Martian soils (and, therefore, regolith simulant-based substrates) are potentially deficient in all macro-and micronutrients, which are derived exclusively (N), mostly (P, S), or partly (K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, B, Cl, and Ni) from the degradation of organic components.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from terrestrial simulant experiments can be extrapolated to off-world BLSS conditions.
“Thus, it is essential to evaluate whether these soil simulants can be exploited to support future colonies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In situ recycled organic matter can be produced in sufficient quantity and quality in BLSS to amend regolith.
“The organic waste produced by BLSS crews can help recover compounds and allow their use as fertilizers or compost to support plant growth.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The space environment (e.g., microgravity, radiation) will not fundamentally alter the physicochemical and biological processes assumed from Earth-based experiments.
“The use of this amendment and soil tillage can also help mitigate the effects of microgravity on water leaching (Maggi and Pallud, 2010).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regolith lacks a natural biome and is deficient in essential macronutrients such as nitrogen and micronutrients including copper, zinc, and boron.
“Unlike terrestrial soil, it lacks a natural biome and is deficient in essential macronutrients such as nitrogen, as well as key micronutrients including copper, zinc, and boron (Eichler et al., 2021;Duri et al., 2022).”
From Spirulina supported plant growth in regolith simulants and elevated levels of CO2 (2025) · cites this paper as Duri et al., 2022
The Abstract says regolith lacks a microbiome, and the Conclusion says simulants lack key macronutrients including nitrogen. Section 3 describes copper, zinc, and boron as potentially deficient, while §2.2 says they occur in trace concentrations in minerals; the paper does not establish the categorical micronutrient deficiency stated in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Cites
An Introduction to Plant Physiology
Curtis, O. F., & Clark, D. G. (1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/129887b0 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
A Habitable Fluvio-Lacustrine Environment at Yellowknife Bay, Gale Crater, Mars
Grotzinger, J. P., Sumner, D. Y., Kah, L. C., Stack, K., Gupta, S., Edgar, L., Rubin, D., Lewis, K., Schieber, J., Mangold, N., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242777 · Cited by 901 · see citing works
The Use of Nutrients in Crop Plants
Fageria, N. K. (2016) · doi:10.1201/9781420075113 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Organic matter preserved in 3-billion-year-old mudstones at Gale crater, Mars
Eigenbrode, J. L., Summons, R. E., Steele, A., Freissinet, C., Millan, M., Navarro-González, R., Sutter, B., McAdam, A. C., Franz, H. B., Glavin, D. P., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9185 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
The use of nutrients in crop plants
Sale, P. W. G. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcp227 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Rikken, G. B., Kroon, A. G. M., & van Ginkel, C. G. (1996) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530050707 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
McFee, W. W., & VanScoyoc, G. E. (1975) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1975.03615995003900050003x · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Redox stratification of an ancient lake in Gale crater, Mars
Hurowitz, J. A., Grotzinger, J. P., Fischer, W. W., McLennan, S. M., Milliken, R. E., Stein, N., Vasavada, A. R., Blake, D. F., Dehouck, E., Eigenbrode, J. L., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah6849 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Mojave Mars Simulant-Characterization of a New Geologic Mars Analog
Peters, G. H., Abbey, W., Bearman, G. H., Mungas, G. S., Smith, J. A., Anderson, R. C., Douglas, S., & Beegle, L. W. (2008) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.05.004 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Zheng, Y., Wang, S., Ouyang, Z., Zou, Y., Liu, J., Li, C., Li, X., & Feng, J. (2009) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2008.07.006 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Mars global simulant MGS-1: A Rocknest-based open standard for basaltic martian regolith simulants
Cannon, K. M., Britt, D. T., Smith, T. M., Fritsche, R. F., & Batcheldor, D. (2019) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.08.019 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Stern, J. C., Sutter, B., Freissinet, C., Navarro-González, R., McKay, C. P., Archer, P. D., Buch, A., Brunner, A. E., Coll, P., Eigenbrode, J. L., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1420932112 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
(1994) · Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Space IV · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Can Plants Grow on Mars and the Moon: A Growth Experiment on Mars and Moon Soil Simulants
Wamelink, G. W. W., Frissel, J. Y., Krijnen, W. H. J., Verwoert, M. R., & Goedhart, P. W. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103138 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Sustainable life support on Mars – the potential roles of cyanobacteria
Verseux, C., Baqué, M., Lehto, K., de Vera, J.-P. P., Rothschild, L. J., & Billi, D. (2016) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s147355041500021x · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Properties of Lunar Soil Simulant Manufactured in Japan
Kanamori, H., Udagawa, S., Yoshida, T., Matsumoto, S., & Takagi, K. (1998) · doi:10.1061/40339(206)53 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Soil-like deposits observed by Sojourner, the Pathfinder rover
Moore, H. J., Bickler, D. B., Crisp, J. A., Eisen, H. J., Gensler, J. A., Haldemann, A. F. C., Matijevic, J. R., Reid, L. K., & Pavlics, F. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/1998je900005 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Perchlorate on Mars: a chemical hazard and a resource for humans
Davila, A. F., Willson, D., Coates, J. D., & McKay, C. P. (2013) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550413000189 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Towards synthetic biological approaches to resource utilization on space missions
Menezes, A. A., Cumbers, J., Hogan, J. A., & Arkin, A. P. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0715 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Moore, H. J., & Jakosky, B. M. (1989) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90132-2 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Geochemical Reservoirs and Timing of Sulfur Cycling on Mars
Gaillard, F., Michalski, J. R., Berger, G., McLennan, S. M., & Scaillet, B. (2012) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9947-4 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Mixing relationships in the Martian regolith and the composition of globally homogeneous dust
McSWEEN, H. Y., Jr., & Keil, K. (2000) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00401-9 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Lunar Base Agriculture: Soils for Plant Growth
(1989) · ASSA, CSSA and SSSA · doi:10.2134/1989.lunarbaseagriculture · Cited by 111 · see citing works
de Vera, J.-P., Horneck, G., Rettberg, P., & Ott, S. (2004) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.10.035 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Geochemistry of Martian basalts with constraints on magma genesis
Filiberto, J. (2017) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.06.009 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
The effects of space weathering on Apollo 17 mare soils: Petrographie and chemical characterization
Taylor, L. A., Pieters, C. M., Keller, L. P., Morris, R. V., McKay, D. S., Patchen, A. D., & Wentworth, S. J. (2001) · Meteoritics and Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2001.tb01871.x · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Challenging the agricultural viability of martian regolith simulants
Eichler, A., Hadland, N., Pickett, D., Masaitis, D., Handy, D., Perez, A., Batcheldor, D., Wheeler, B., & Palmer, A. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114022 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
NAO-1: Lunar Highland Soil Simulant Developed in China
Li, Y., Liu, J., & Yue, Z. (2008) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2009)22:1(53 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Lunar Regolith Simulant Materials: Recommendations for Standardization, Production, and Usage
Sibille, L., Schlagheck, R. A., French, R. A., & Carpenter, P. (2006) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Geotechnical Properties of BP-1 Lunar Regolith Simulant
Suescun-Florez, E., Roslyakov, S., Iskander, M. G., & Baamer, M. (2014) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000462 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Simulating Martian Regolith in the Laboratory
Seiferlin, K., Ehrenfreund, P., Garry, J., Gunderson, K., Hütter, E., Kargl, G., Maturilli, A., & Merrison, J. P. (2008) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2008.09.017 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
JMSS-1: a new Martian soil simulant
Zeng, X., Li, X., Wang, S., Li, S., Spring, N., Tang, H., Li, Y., & Feng, J. (2015) · Earth, Planets and Space · doi:10.1186/s40623-015-0248-5 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Mind the gap: A classification system for integrating the subsolum into soil surveys
Juilleret, J., Dondeyne, S., Vancampenhout, K., Deckers, J., & Hissler, C. (2015) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.031 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Jones, S. B., & Or, D. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900091 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The Shawmere anorthosite and OB-1 as lunar highland regolith simulants
Battler, M. M., & SPRAY, J. G. (2009) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2009.09.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Lunar dust and lunar simulant activation and monitoring
Wallace, W. T., Taylor, L. A., Liu, Y., Cooper, B. L., McKay, D. S., Chen, B., & Jeevarajan, A. S. (2009) · Meteoritics and Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb00781.x · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Space biology : studies at orbital stations
Nechitailo, G. S., Mashinsky, A. L., & Lyubimov, N. (1993) · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Geotechnical Properties of NT-LHT-2M Lunar Highland Simulant
Zeng, X., He, C., & Wilkinson, A. (2010) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000026 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Direct Formation of Structural Components Using a Martian Soil Simulant
Chow, B. J., Chen, T., Zhong, Y., & Qiao, Y. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01157-w · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Crop growth and viability of seeds on Mars and Moon soil simulants
Wamelink, G. W. W., Frissel, J. Y., Krijnen, W. H. J., & Verwoert, M. R. (2019) · Open Agriculture · doi:10.1515/opag-2019-0051 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Aluminium Speciation and Phytotoxicity in Alkaline Soils
Brautigan, D. J., Rengasamy, P., & Chittleborough, D. J. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1232-5 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Adamo, P., Agrelli, D., & Zampella, M. (2018) · Environmental Geochemistry: Site Characterization, Data Analysis and Case Histories · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63763-5.00010-0 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationFackrell, L. E., Schroeder, P. A., Thompson, A., Stockstill-Cahill, K., & Hibbitts, C. A. (2021) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114055 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The Multiplanetary Future of Plant Synthetic Biology
Llorente, B., Williams, T. C., & Goold, H. D. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9070348 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Caporale, A. G., Vingiani, S., Palladino, M., El-Nakhel, C., Duri, L. G., Pannico, A., Rouphael, Y., De Pascale, S., & Adamo, P. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137543 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationDuri, L. G., El-Nakhel, C., Caporale, A. G., Ciriello, M., Graziani, G., Pannico, A., Palladino, M., Ritieni, A., De Pascale, S., Vingiani, S., et al. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9050628 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationTang, H., Li, X., Sensen, Z., Wang, S., Liu, J., Li, S., Li, Y., & Wu, Y. (2016) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2016.11.023 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
McCollom, T. M., Robbins, M., Moskowitz, B., Berquó, T. S., Jöns, N., & Hynek, B. M. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/jgre.20044 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Growing pioneer Plants for a Lunar Base
Kozyrovska, N. O., Lutvynenko, T. L., Korniichuk, O. S., Kovalchuk, M. V., Voznyuk, T. M., Kononuchenko, O., Zaetz, I., Rogutskyy, I. S., Mytrokhyn, O. V., Mashkovska, S. P., et al. (2006) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.005 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Perchlorate and Agriculture on Mars
Oze, C., Beisel, J., Dabsys, E., Dall, J., North, G., Scott, A., Lopez, A. M., Holmes, R., & Fendorf, S. (2021) · Soil Systems · doi:10.3390/soilsystems5030037 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Use of lunar regolith as a substrate for plant growth
Ming, D. W., & Henninger, D. L. (1994) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/0273-1177(94)90333-6 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Disambiguating the soils of Mars
Certini, G., Karunatillake, S., Zhao, Y., Meslin, P., Cousin, A., Hood, D. R., & Scalenghe, R. (2020) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2020.104922 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Maggi, F., & Pallud, C. (2010) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2010.07.012 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Results of Apollo 11 and 12 Quarantine Studies on Plants
Walkinshaw, C. H., Sweet, H. C., Venketeswaran, S., & Horne, W. H. (1970) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1295365 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Organic Matter on the Earth's Moon
Thomas-Keprta, K. L., Clemett, S. J., Messenger, S., Ross, D. K., Le, L., Rahman, Z., McKay, D. S., Gibson, E. K., Gonzalez, C., & Peabody, W. (2014) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2014.02.047 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The role of aqueous alteration in the formation of martian soils
Bandfield, J. L., Rogers, A. D., & Edwards, C. S. (2010) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.08.028 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Soil Test Apparatus for Lunar Surfaces
Rahmatian, L. A., & Metzger, P. T. (2010) · ASCE International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments (Earth and Space) · doi:10.1061/41096(366)25 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Clark, J. V., Archer, P. D., Gruener, J. E., Ming, D. W., Tu, V. M., Niles, P. B., & Mertzman, S. A. (2020) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113936 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Karl, D., Kamutzki, F., Zocca, A., Görke, O., Guenster, J., & Gurlo, A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204025 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Lunar Plant Biology—A Review of the Apollo Era
Ferl, R. J., & Paul, A.-L. (2010) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2009.0417 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Bioaugmentation in Growing Plants for Lunar Bases
Zaets, I., Burlak, O., Rogutskyy, I., Vasilenko, A., Mytrokhyn, O., Lukashov, D., Foing, B., & Kozyrovska, N. (2011) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2010.11.014 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Primm, K. M., Gough, R. V., Wong, J., Valentín, E. G. R., Martínez, G., Hogancamp, J. V., Archer, P. D., Ming, D. W., & Tolbert, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1029/2018je005540 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
(2007) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Preliminary study of greenhouse grown Swiss chard in mixtures of Compost and Mars Regolith Simulant
Gilrain, M. R., Hogan, J. A., Cowan, R. M., Finstein, M. S., & Logendra, L. S. (1999) · SAE Technical Paper Series · doi:10.4271/1999-01-2021 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Bates, S., Gushin, V., Bingham, G., Vinokhodova, A., Marquit, J., & Sychev, V. (2009) · Habitation · doi:10.3727/154296610x12686999887201 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Ramírez, D. A., Kreuze, J., Amoros, W., Valdivia-Silva, J. E., Ranck, J., Garcia, S., Salas, E., & Yactayo, W. (2019) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550417000453 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Kölbl, D., Pignitter, M., Somoza, V., Schimak, M. P., Štrbák, O., Blazevic, A., & Milojević, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01918 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Reaction Mechanism of Various Types of Lunar Soil Simulants by Hydrogen Reduction
Sueyoshi, K., Watanabe, T., Nakano, Y., Kanamori, H., Aoki, S., Miyahara, A., & Matsui, K. (2008) · ASCE International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments (Earth and Space) · doi:10.1061/40988(323)134 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
A view of extraterrestrial soils
Certini, G., Scalenghe, R., & Amundson, R. (2009) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01173.x · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Functional Comparison of Lunar Regoliths and Their Simulants
Rickman, D., Edmunson, J., & McLemore, C. (2013) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000223 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
(2008) · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Developing a new controllable lunar dust simulant: BHLD20
Sun, H., Yi, M., Shen, Z., Zhang, X., & Ma, S. (2017) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2017.04.010 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Growth of sweetpotato in lunar and mars simulants
Mortley, D. G., Aglan, H. A., Bonsi, C. K., & Hill, W. A. (2000) · SAE Technical Paper Series · doi:10.4271/2000-01-2289 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
SMART-1 technology, scientific results and heritage for future space missions
Foing, B. H., Racca, G. D., Marini, A., Koschny, D., Frew, D., Grieger, B., Camino, O., Josset, J. L., & Grande, M. (2017) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2017.09.002 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Y‐Mars: An Astrobiological Analogue of Martian Mudstone
Stevens, A., Steer, E. D., McDonald, A., Amador, E. S., & Cockell, C. S. (2018) · Earth and Space Science · doi:10.1002/2017ea000318 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Analysis of Vegetable Seedlings Grown in Contact with Apollo 14 Lunar Surface Fines1
Walkinshaw, C. H., & Johnson, P. H. (1971) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.6.6.532 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Lunar and Planetary Excavation Prototype Development and Testing at the Colorado School of Mines
van Susante, P. J., & Dreyer, C. (2010) · ASCE International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments (Earth and Space) · doi:10.1061/41096(366)109 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Apollo 12 lunar material: effects on plant pigments
Weete, J. D., & Walkinshaw, C. H. (1972) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b72-015 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Taylor, S. R. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012088589-3/50016-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Chamindu Deepagoda, T. K. K., Jones, S. B., Tuller, M., de Jonge, L. W., Kawamoto, K., Komatsu, T., & Moldrup, P. (2014) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.04.018 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Physical sedimentology experiments with sulfuric acid solutions: Implications for Mars?
Benison, K. C., LaClair, D., & Walker, J. (2008) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.036 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Hoson, T., Kamisaka, S., Wakabayashi, K., Soga, K., Tabuchi, A., Tokumoto, H., Okamura, K., Nakamura, Y., Mori, R., Tanimoto, E., et al. (2000) · Biological Sciences in Space · doi:10.2187/bss.14.75 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Mineralogically Accurate Simulants for Lunar ISRU, and Strategic Regolith Processing
Cannon, K. M., & Britt, D. T. (2019) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Apollo 12 Lunar Material: Effects on Lipid Levels of Tobacco Tissue Cultures
Weete, J. D., Walkinshaw, C. H., & Laseter, J. L. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.175.4022.623 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Malla, R. B., Binienda, W. K., & Maji, A. K. (2006) · doi:10.1061/9780784408308 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Recent advances in the development of the SVET space greenhouse equipment
Ivanova, T. N., Sapunova, S., Kostov, P., & Ilieva, I. (2006) · International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies · doi:10.1109/rast.2005.1512662 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Lunar Regolith Simulant CUG-1A
He, X., Xiao, L., Huang, J., Wan, C. H., Wu, T., Gao, R., Yan, S., & He, Q. (2010) · LPI · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Preliminary Geological Findings on the BP-1 Simulant
Stoeser, D. B., Wilson, S., & Rickman, D. L. (2010) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
(2018) · Lunar and Planetary Science Conference · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Utilization of On-Site Resources for Regenerative Life Support Systems at Lunar and Martian Outposts
Ming, D. W., Golden, D. C., & Henninger, D. L. (1993) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/932091 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sweetpotato Growth Using a Microporous Tube System with Lunar Simulant Medium
Aglan, H., Mortley, D., Trotman, A., Loretan, P., & Hill, W. (1998) · SAE Technical Paper Series · doi:10.4271/981806 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Highlights of Science and Exploration Activities at the SSERVI CLASS Node
Cannon, K. C., & Britt, D. T. (2019) · EPSC · Cited by 1 · see citing works
3D Shape Characterization and Image-Based DEM Simulation of the Lunar Soil Simulant FJS-1
Matsushima, T., Katagiri, J., Uesugi, K., Tsuchiyama, A., & Nakano, T. (2009) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2009)22:1(15
Hopkins, B. D. (2008) · The Making of Modern Afghanistan · doi:10.1057/9780230228764_1
Manufactured Soils for Plant Growth at a Lunar Base
Ming, D. W. (1989) · ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books · doi:10.2134/1989.lunarbaseagriculture.c7
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Heiken, 1991, Lunar Sourcebook
- Lee, 2017, In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Construction Technology for Moon and Mars
- Marquit, 2008, Testing Crew Responses to Varied Higher Plant Presentations in the MARS-500 Day Mission Simulation
- 2018, Pursuant to Section 432(b) of the NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2017, 115-10
- 2014, Keys to Soil Taxonomy
- Stoeser, Design and Specifications for the highland Regolith Prototype Simulants NU-LHT-1m and-2M
- Zubrin, 2011, Case for mars
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward sustainable space exploration: a roadmap for harnessing the power of microorganisms
Santomartino, R., Averesch, N. J. H., Bhuiyan, M., Cockell, C. S., Colangelo-Lillis, J. R., Gumulya, Y., Lehner, B., Lopez-Ayala, I., McMahon, S., Mohanty, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37070-2 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Caporale, A. G., Palladino, M., Pascale, S. D., Duri, L. G., Rouphael, Y., & Adamo, P. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116455 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, C., Yu, Z., Shao, R., & Li, J. (2024) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118723 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Caporale, A. G., Amato, M., Duri, L. G., Bochicchio, R., De Pascale, S., Simeone, G. D. R., Palladino, M., Pannico, A., Rao, M. A., Rouphael, Y., et al. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11233345 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationThe physiology of plants in the context of space exploration
Maffei, M. E., Balestrini, R., Costantino, P., Lanfranco, L., Morgante, M., Battistelli, A., & Bianco, M. D. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06989-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Xia, Y., Yuan, Y., Li, C., & Sun, Z. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05391-z · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Overview and recommendations for research on plants and microbes in regolith-based agriculture
Fackrell, L. E., Humphrey, S., Loureiro, R. R., Palmer, A. G., & Long-Fox, J. M. (2024) · npj Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1038/s44264-024-00013-5 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Microalgae in bioregenerative life support systems for space applications
Revellame, E. D., Aguda, R. M., Gatdula, K. M., Holmes, W. E., Fortela, D. L. B., Sharp, W. W., Gang, D. D., CHISTOSERDOV, A. Y., Hernandez, R. A., & Zappi, M. E. (2023) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2023.103332 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Sukumaran, A. K., Zhang, C., Nisar, A., & Agarwal, A. K. (2023) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2023.10.039 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Caporale, A. G., Paradiso, R., Liuzzi, G., Palladino, M., Amitrano, C., Arena, C., Arouna, N., Verrillo, M., Cozzolino, V., De Pascale, S., et al. (2023) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-022-05860-0 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationSynthetic biology for space exploration
Onofri, S., Moeller, R., Billi, D., Balsamo, M., Becker, A., Benvenuto, E., Cassaro, A., Catanzaro, I., Cockell, C. S., Desiderio, A., et al. (2025) · npj Microgravity · doi:10.1038/s41526-025-00488-7 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Duri, L. G., Pannico, A., Petropoulos, S. A., Caporale, A. G., Adamo, P., Graziani, G., Ritieni, A., Pascale, S. D., & Rouphael, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.890786 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationPolyextremophile engineering: a review of organisms that push the limits of life
Caro‐Astorga, J., Meyerowitz, J. T., Stork, D. A., Nattermann, U., Piszkiewicz, S., Vimercati, L., Schwendner, P., Hocher, A., Cockell, C. S., & DeBenedictis, E. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1341701 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
How to make lunar soil suitable for cultivation? – A review
Ding, J., Xu, Y., Tan, J., Zhang, H., Xiong, X., Mei, C., Li, M., & Xie, G. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174603 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Connecting soils to life in conservation planning, nutrient cycling, and planetary science
Lybrand, R. A. (2022) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104247 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Geotechnical laboratory testing of lunar simulants and the importance of standardization
Quinteros, V. S., Mikesell, T. D., Griffiths, L., & Jerves, A. X. (2023) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115812 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A molecular study of Italian ryegrass grown on Martian regolith simulant
Berni, R., Leclercq, C. C., Roux, P., Hausman, J.-F., Renaut, J., & Guerriero, G. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158774 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Gonçalves, R., Wamelink, G. W. W., PUTTEN, P. E. L. V. D., & Evers, J. B. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302149 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Batool, A., Zhang, K., Abbas, F., Akhtar, A., & Mao, J. (2026) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy16020222 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Water permeability of sunlit lunar highlands regolith using LHS-1 simulant
Tabuchi, Y., Kioka, A., & Yamada, Y. (2023) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.09.027 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Duri, L. G., Romano, I., Adamo, P., Rouphael, Y., Pannico, A., Ventorino, V., Pepe, O., Pascale, S. D., & Caporale, A. G. (2025) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-025-01923-3 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationAI-Driven Waste Management in Innovating Space Exploration
Olawade, D. B., Wada, O. Z., Popoola, T. T., Egbon, E., Ijiwade, J. O., & Oladapo, B. I. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17094088 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Space Agriculture: A Comprehensive Systems-Level Review of Challenges and Opportunities
Fazayeli, H., Daigh, A. L. M., Palmer, C., Pitla, S. K., Jones, D., & Ge, Y. (2025) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture15242541 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Cultivation of Vitamin C-Rich Vegetables for Space-Radiation Mitigation
Mortazavi, A., Yarbaksh, H., Zarandi, B. F. B. B., Yarbakhsh, R., Ghadimi-Moghaddam, F., Mortazavi, S. M. J., Haghani, M., Firoozi, D., & Sihver, L. (2024) · Radiation · doi:10.3390/radiation4010008 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Ecosystem and Climate Change Impacts on the Nitrogen Cycle and Biodiversity
Mattoo, R., Mallikarjuna, S. B., & Hemachar, N. (2025) · Nitrogen · doi:10.3390/nitrogen6030078 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Wang, H., Pijl, A. S., Liu, B., Wamelink, G. W. W., Korthals, G. W., Costa, O. Y. A., & Kuramae, E. E. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12040760 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Shao, R., Wu, C., & Li, J. (2025) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.03.047 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Anaerobic digestion of cyanobacterial biomass for plant fertilizer production on Mars
Ramalho, T. P., Siol, A., Kerzenmacher, S., Verseux, C., & Pillot, G. (2025) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132383 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Tiemblo, M. A., Maçario, I. P. E., Tornero, A., Yáñez, A., Andrejkovičová, S., & Gómez, F. (2025) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms13051083 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Atkin, J., Pierson, E. A., Gentry, T. J., & Santos, S. O. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-35759-0 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Caporale, A. G., Paradiso, R., Liuzzi, G., Arouna, N., Pascale, S. D., & Adamo, P. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12010064 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationErosion assessment with Martian dust
Suman, A., & Zanini, N. (2023) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.10.034 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Biomaterials for organically generated habitats beyond Earth
Wordsworth, R., Quayum, R., Kocharian, E., Pearson, A., Portillo, X., Yang, M., Cockell, C. S., Nangle, S. N., & Church, G. M. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adp4985 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sasi, S., Prakash, P., Hayden, S., Dooley, D., Poiré, R., Hu, T., Weerasinghe, J., Levchenko, I., Prasad, K., & Alexander, K. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26178318 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Terrestrial Laser Scanning of Lunar Soil Simulants
Damięcka-Suchocka, M., & Katzer, J. (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15248773 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Seed Priming with Ulva lactuca L . in Cultivars Grown in Martian and Lunar Regolith Analogues
Oliveira, J. C., Pereira, R. C., Johnson, T. S., & Loureiro, R. R. (2024) · Gravitational and Space Research · doi:10.2478/gsr-2024-0006 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Microbial fuel cells powering robots and beyond; historical perspective and future directions
Ieropoulos, I. A., & Moreno, D. Z. (2025) · Bioelectrochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2025.109010 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Islam, A. F., & Banerjee, S. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04057 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Moss-derived microbiome improves crop growth in lunar and Martian soil simulants
Park, J., Kang, D., Jang, J. W., Choi, S., Jeong, S., Kim, S., & Kim, D. (2025) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114023 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mei, C., Xie, G., Ya, H., & Peng, M. (2025) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.09.033 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Yang, W., Song, Y., Ranjith, P. G., Chen, Z., Fang, H., Elsworth, D., Zhang, F., Feng, Y., & Song, X. (2025) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.09.051 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bacterial bio-cementation can repair space bricks
Gupta, N., Kulkarni, R., Naik, A. R., Viswanathan, K., & Kumar, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Space Technologies · doi:10.3389/frspt.2025.1550526 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Effect of vermicompost on rhizobiome and the growth of wheat on Martian regolith simulant
Przemieniecki, S. W., Kalisz, B., Katzer, J., Wamelink, G. W. W., Kosewska, O., Kosewska, A., Sowiński, P., & Mastalerz, J. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173299 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Spirulina supported plant growth in regolith simulants and elevated levels of CO2
Miller, K. A., Trevino, D. T., & Cauthorn, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Space Technologies · doi:10.3389/frspt.2025.1651978 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Coker, H. R., Denvir, A. C., Robertson, I. J., Shackelford, C. E. B., Li, W., Lin, C.-W., Watters, R. M., Sparks, D. L., Smith, A. P., & Howe, J. A. (2025) · ACS Earth and Space Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00312 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
MoonCrab: Design and tests of novel hybrid locomotion rover
Tomiło, P. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106164 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zhao, Y., Luo, R., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Fang, X., Tong, X., Qian, Y., Zhou, Z., Yang, Y., Zeng, X., et al. (2024) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-024-06970-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Leal, M. A. L., Tovar, D., Infante, A., Barriga, O., Ruíz, E., Nieves, J. S., & Melgarejo, L. M. (2025) · Polar Biology · doi:10.1007/s00300-025-03348-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Lunar regolith for plasma spray coatings
Kadok, J., Bulou, S., Gaulain, T., & Choquet, P. (2024) · Surface and Coatings Technology · doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.131111 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Haq, S. I. U., Hájek, J., & Barták, M. (2025) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.09.056 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Atkin, J., Skabelund, H. A., Pierson, E. A., Zhen, S., Vandemark, G. J., & Gentry, T. J. (2025) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2025.1670807 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Haq, S. I. U., Hájek, J., & Barták, M. (2025) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2025.09.008 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Martín, J. S., Leone, G., Riveros-Jensen, K., Alam, M. A., Cabrera, R., Martín, D. S., Oses, R., Blamey, J. M., Demergasso, C. S., Abrevaya, X. C., et al. (2024) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116403 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Coufalík, P., Stavrakakis, H.-A., & Argyrou, D. (2025) · Czech Polar Reports · doi:10.5817/cpr2024-2-15 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Potential strategic ore deposits on Mars: Implications for in situ resource utilization
Palin, R. M., Robb, L. J., Gardiner, N. J., Koopmans, L., Sihombing, F. M. H., Sayab, M., Wade, J., & Elardo, S. M. (2025) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105290 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Krejčí, Š., Stavrakakis, H.-A., Coufalík, P., Sekerák, J., Hájek, J., Argyrou, D., & Barták, M. (2026) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550426100275 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A systematic review of plant cultivation and growth in extraterrestrial regolith simulants
Elkamouh, A., Chami, D. E., Abdelmouneim, A. A., Khadra, R., & Pascale, S. D. (2026) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2026.04.005 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Biochar improves lettuce seedling growth by influencing the nutrient content of simulated lunar soil
Mei, C., Xie, G., Ya, H., & Peng, M. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.113327 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cahill, B., & Braddock, M. (2022) · Journal of Human Earth and Future · doi:10.28991/hef-2022-03-03-04 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Review of Off-World in Bioregenerative Food Systems
Fackrell, L. E. (2023) · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · doi:10.1007/s41745-023-00381-w · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lorenz, C., Mele, B. H., & Arena, C. (2024) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.05.022 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
From dust to seed: a lunar chickpea storyPreprint
Atkin, J., & Santos, S. O. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.18.576311 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Growth and molecular responses of potato to lunar regolith simulantsPreprint
Handy, D., Loeffler, A., Knudson, M., Campbell, S., Jaiswal, P., Anderson, J. C., & Goyer, A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.23.707481 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Caporale, A. G., Paradiso, R., Arouna, N., Amitrano, C., Tagliamonte, S., Chiacchio, M. F., Vitaglione, P., De Pascale, S., & Adamo, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1676285 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationNedbalová, L., Mihál, M., Procházková, L., Kvíderová, J., & Lukavský, J. (2025) · Czech Polar Reports · doi:10.5817/cpr2024-2-19 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bacior, M., Kubat, K., Harańczyk, H., Kula-Maximenko, M., Niemiec, M., Stopka, A., & Gorczyca, A. (2025) · International Agrophysics · doi:10.31545/intagr/204531 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Microbial Life and Adaptation on Land, Underwater, and Other Planets for Sustainable Development
Kapoor, D. D., Yadav, S., & Gupta, R. K. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9859-9_21 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ramalho, T. P., Marchal, G., Santiago, Ó., Kerzenmacher, S., Verseux, C., & Pillot, G. (2025) · Chemical Engineering Journal Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ceja.2025.100996 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mansouri, F., Barros, A. N., Bordoni, L., Fedeli, D., Pontetti, G., Roncolato, E., Mannozzi, C., Pompei, F., Vittori, S., Pettinelli, E., et al. (2025) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2025.11.008 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ramalho, T. P., Bunchek, J. M., Schubert, D., Kerzenmacher, S., Verseux, C., & Pillot, G. (2026) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2026.174922 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Comparison of two laser wavelengths for LIBS bioimaging of plants grown in lunar regolith
Vozár, T., Čechová, L., Buday, J., Fuleky, M., Molnárová, K., Lenža, L., Mužík, J., Koshiba, Y., Smrž, M., Pořízka, P., et al. (2026) · Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.sab.2026.107513 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Selection of beneficial fungi for plants with the potential to metabolize lunar and Martian regolith
Oliveira, J. C., Loureiro, R. R., Palmer, A., & Patreze, C. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2026.1784533 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
McKenzie, C., Watson, P., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., & Lappa, M. (2026) · Journal of Rheology · doi:10.1122/8.0001041 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Vibrationally aided flow of lunar regolith simulants in a hopper-based conveying device
Lappa, M., Watson, P., & Vincent-Bonnieu, S. (2026) · Journal of Rheology · doi:10.1122/8.0001055 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Šokić, M., Rosić, I., Maric, I., Stanković, S., & Berić, T. (2026) · Comprehensive Plant Biology · doi:10.2298/cpb2601057s · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Development of Soil Science in Campania
Adamo, P., Basile, A., Coppola, E., D’Antonio, A., Gennaro, A. D., Ermice, A., Grilli, E., & Rao, M. A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52744-9_11 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationRamalho, T. P., Bunchek, J. M., Schubert, D., Kerzenmacher, S., Verseux, C., & Pillot, G. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5364677 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Regolith simulant and green compost as substrates for plant cultivation in Mars space colonies
Liuzzi, G., Paradiso, R., Caporale, A. G., Arouna, N., Pascale, S. D., & Adamo, P. (2023) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2023.1377.72
Self-citationPotential for Lunar and Martian Regolith to Support Agriculture
Braddock, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09575-2_219-1
Space farming: supporting human life beyond earth
Pascale, S. D., & Paradiso, R. (2024) · International Journal of Vegetable Science · doi:10.1080/19315260.2024.2383446
Antarctic nematodes survival in Martian and Lunar regolith simulants under terrestrial conditions
Amaral, C. R. L., Bones, F. L. V., FREITAS, A. C. D., Goldenberg-Barbosa, R., Magalhães, M. G. P., Moreira, L. M., ANJOS, D., Donato, A. L. D. S., Amorim, A., & Câmara, P. E. A. S. (2024) · Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências · doi:10.1590/0001-3765202420240532
Mokhtari, A. M., & Basavaraju, D. H. (2025) · Springer aerospace technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91227-6_27
Carbo-thermal reduction of lunar highland regolith simulant for in-situ manufacturing of SiC
Srimurugan, N., & Subbiah, S. (2025) · Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.049
Infrastructure and Master Planning
Inocente, D. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394318131.ch17
Clays as natural resources for human missions on Mars
Pandey, A., & Cuadros, J. (2025) · Developments in clay science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21614-5.00011-0
Martian mudstone simulant MUD-1 as a new Mars analogue material
Yu, W., Zeng, X., & Li, X. (2026) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2026.03.049
Microalgae for bioregenerative life support in space
Revellame, E. D., Gatdula, K. M., Aguda, R. M., Fortela, D. L. B., Holmes, W. E., Hernandez, R. A., & Zappi, M. E. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34082-6.00044-1
Feasibility of Chlorella vulgaris Cultivation Using Mars In situ Resources and Human-Derived Wastes
Gatdula, K. M., Fonseca, L., Yin, P., Holmes, W. E., Hernandez, R. A., Zappi, M. E., & Revellame, E. D. (2026) · Space Science & Technology · doi:10.34133/space.0559
First synthesis of glasses from Martian regolith simulants
Gibin, M. S., dos Santos, H., dos Santos, A., Nazhat, S. N., Hudon, P., Muniz, R. F., Sato, F., Baesso, M. L., & Zanuto, V. S. (2026) · Ceramics International · doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2026.04.361
Sealey, E. J., de Freitas, A. S., García-Martínez, P., Tsai, S. M., Schultz, J., & Rosado, A. S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9578631/v1
Ash from the Eyjafjallajökull volcano as a potential simulant of lunar and Martian regolith
Mrówka, M., Moskal, G., Tomaszewska, A., Mikuśkiewicz, M., & Wagner, P. W. (2026) · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · doi:10.1007/s10973-026-15884-8
Kumar, Y., & Dey, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-24505-2_4
Sustainable plant cultivation in Lunar regolith: Feasibility study
Dias, J. E. L., May, Z., Mohai, M. P., & Barkó, G. (2026) · Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1556/446.2026.00321
Figueiredo, I., Figueira, J., Cortesão, M., & Palomeque, H. (2026) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2026.1846412
From regolith to dirt: the role of organic matter in creating a fertile soil beyond Earth
Caporale, A. G., Giannetta, B., Adamo, P., & Zaccone, C. (2026) · Pedosphere · doi:10.1016/j.pedsph.2026.08.012
Self-citationDenvir, A. C., Coker, H. R., Barcenilla, B. B., & Howe, J. A. (2026) · ACS Earth and Space Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.6c00195
Oroian, I., & Tripathi, A. (2026) · Extreme Life Biospeology & Astrobiology · doi:10.67784/0043
Hamid, W., & Ahmad, R. (2026) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2026.08.079
Grava, C., Brisset, J., Deutsch, A. N., Laferriere, K. L., Mandt, K. E., Prem, P., & Tucker, O. J. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/bs.spadv.2026.08.011
Ito, G., Moraetis, D., Flahaut, J., Ioannou, Z., & Pavlopoulos, K. (2026) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2026.106352
- Authors
- Duri, L. G., Caporale, A. G., Rouphael, Y., Vingiani, S., Palladino, M., De Pascale, S., & Adamo, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Caporale, Antonio Giandonato
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-01-04
- Volume
- 8
- ISSN
- 2296-987X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205652835
- Semantic Scholar
- 7d2d9749483328ab8038b4e63ca5d76cca6d868a
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Agenzia Spaziale Italiana
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
- Keywords
- lunar regolith simulant, Martian regolith simulant, bioregenerative life support, in-situ resource utilization, plant growth media, space agriculture, reduced gravity, mineralogical composition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review