The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychosocial Factors Associated with Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
Abstract
Purpose.: This study examined the relationship between various psychosocial factors and fruit and vegetable consumption. Design.: The 5 A Day Baseline Survey, conducted in August 1991, just before the initiation of the 5 A Day for Better Health Program, obtained data on adults' intakes of, and their knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes regarding, fruits and vegetables. Setting.: The survey was conducted by telephone. Subjects.: Subjects were 2811 adults (response rate, 43%) aged 18 years and older in the 48 coterminous United States. Measures.: Fruit and vegetable intake was measured as self-reported frequency of use; most of the psychosocial variables were measured using Likert scales. Results.: This study estimates that only 8% of American adults thought that five or more servings of fruits and vegetables were needed for good health. Of the factors studied, the most important in determining someone's fruit and vegetable intake were the number of servings they thought they should have in a day, whether they liked the taste, and whether they had been in the habit of eating many fruits and vegetables since childhood. These few factors accounted for 15% more of the variation in fruit and vegetable consumption than did demographic variables alone (8%). Conclusions.: Nutrition education should stress the need to eat five or more servings of fruits and vegetables per day because few adults are aware of this recommendation and such knowledge is strongly associated with increased intake. Furthermore, efforts to increase the palatability of fruits and vegetables, especially among children, should be promoted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437
Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology
Steinmetz, K. A., & Potter, J. D. (1991) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00051672 · Cited by 1,118
Cited by
Nutrition knowledge and food intake
Wardle, J., Parmenter, K., & Waller, J. (2000) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0311 · Cited by 935
Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, Nutritional Knowledge and Beliefs in Mothers and Children
GIBSON, E. L., WARDLE, J., & WATTS, C. J. (1998) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1998.0180 · Cited by 623
DNA damage from micronutrient deficiencies is likely to be a major cause of cancer
Ames, B. N. (2001) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00070-7 · Cited by 565
Young people and healthy eating: a systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators
Shepherd, J. (2005) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyh060 · Cited by 484
Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England
Parmenter, K., Waller, J., & Wardle, J. (2000) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/15.2.163 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Krebs-Smith, S. M., Heimendinger, J., Patterson, B. H., Subar, A. F., Kessler, R., & Pivonka, E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Health Promotion
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 98-104
- ISSN
- 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-6602
- OpenAlex
- W2011604683
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychosocial Factors Associated with Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4278/0890-1171-10.2.98
- The paper
- Krebs-Smith, S. M., Heimendinger, J., Patterson, B. H., Subar, A. F., Kessler, R., & Pivonka, E. (1995). Psychosocial Factors Associated with Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. American Journal of Health Promotion. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-10.2.98
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.