Cited by 146Public Health Policies and EducationCommunity Health and DevelopmentSchool Health and Nursing Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to Institutionalize Health Promotion Programs

Steckler, Allan, Goodman, Robert M.·1989·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

This article presents six implications for practice that suggest how to optimize the institutionalization of health promotion programs. These six implications were derived from a study of ten health promotion programs funded by the Virginia State Health Department and operated by local schools- and community health agencies. Institutionalization refers to the long-term survival of health promotion programs, i.e., survival well beyond an initial grant funding period. To generate the implications for practice, a multiple case design for cross-case comparisons was applied to the ten health promotion programs. In brief, the six practice implications are: 1) cultivating a “program champion”; 2) favoring organizations with mature “subsystems”; 3) favoring organizations in which health promotion “fits” with the organization's mission; 4) avoiding brokering relationships; 5) altering lengths of funding periods; and 6) funding existing worthy programs. The significance of these practice implications for both funding and implementing agencies is briefly discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/0890-1171-3.4.34

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Berman P., 1978, Public Policy, 26, 157
  2. Healthy People, 1979, The Surgeon General's Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
  3. Promoting Health/Preventing Disease, 1980, Objectives for the Nation
  4. 1981, Strategies for Promoting Health for Specific Populations
  5. 1985, Criteria for the Development of Health Promotion and Education Programs
  6. Kaluzny A., 1986, Health Services Organizations: A Guide To Research and Assessment
  7. Patton M., 1980, Qualitative Evaluation Methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Metadata

Authors
Steckler, A., & Goodman, R. M.
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
1989-03
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
34-43
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W2079137308
Cited by
146
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
institutionalization, health promotion programs, program sustainability, program champions, organizational subsystems, organizational mission alignment, program funding, school health promotion, community health agencies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review