The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to Institutionalize Health Promotion Programs
Abstract
This article presents six implications for practice that suggest how to optimize the institutionalization of health promotion programs. These six implications were derived from a study of ten health promotion programs funded by the Virginia State Health Department and operated by local schools- and community health agencies. Institutionalization refers to the long-term survival of health promotion programs, i.e., survival well beyond an initial grant funding period. To generate the implications for practice, a multiple case design for cross-case comparisons was applied to the ten health promotion programs. In brief, the six practice implications are: 1) cultivating a “program champion”; 2) favoring organizations with mature “subsystems”; 3) favoring organizations in which health promotion “fits” with the organization's mission; 4) avoiding brokering relationships; 5) altering lengths of funding periods; and 6) funding existing worthy programs. The significance of these practice implications for both funding and implementing agencies is briefly discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Whereas the early literature on sustainability focused largely on institutionalization and routinization (e.g., integrating a new set of practices into the routine operations of an organization) (129, 149), there has been recognition over the past 20 years that institutionalization may impede organizations or communities from adopting more effective practices when new evidence emerges (135).”
From The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care (2018) · cites this paper as [129]
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Structural inertia and organizational change
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095567 · Cited by 7,244
Book Reviews: Qualitative Evaluation Methods
Cordray, D. S., & Patton, M. Q. (1981) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/1164029 · Cited by 4,163
Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.1982.6447463 · Cited by 3,401
(2017) · doi:10.4135/9781473960275 · Cited by 1,488
III. “Degrees of Freedom” and the Case Study
Campbell, D. T. (1975) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/001041407500800204 · Cited by 1,059
Health Education Planning: A diagnostic approach
(1986) · Journal of Nutrition Education · doi:10.1016/s0022-3182(86)80109-1 · Cited by 950
Fielding, N., & Fielding, J. (1986) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412984775 · Cited by 653
Berg, K. A. (1977) · The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas · doi:10.1080/00098655.1977.9956956 · Cited by 584
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Berman P., 1978, Public Policy, 26, 157
- Healthy People, 1979, The Surgeon General's Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
- Promoting Health/Preventing Disease, 1980, Objectives for the Nation
- 1981, Strategies for Promoting Health for Specific Populations
- 1985, Criteria for the Development of Health Promotion and Education Programs
- Kaluzny A., 1986, Health Services Organizations: A Guide To Research and Assessment
- Patton M., 1980, Qualitative Evaluation Methods
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322 · Cited by 7,217
A Review of Collaborative Partnerships as a Strategy for Improving Community Health
Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369 · Cited by 1,134
Shediac-Rizkallah, M. C., & Bone, L. R. (1998) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/13.1.87 · Cited by 1,129
The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care
Shelton, R. C., Cooper, B. R., & Stirman, S. W. (2018) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014731 · Cited by 806
Is Sustainability Possible? A Review and Commentary on Empirical Studies of Program Sustainability
Scheirer, M. A. (2005) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214005278752 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Steckler, A., & Goodman, R. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Health Promotion
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 34-43
- ISSN
- 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-6602
- OpenAlex
- W2079137308
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- institutionalization, health promotion programs, program sustainability, program champions, organizational subsystems, organizational mission alignment, program funding, school health promotion, community health agencies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
