Cited by 1,129Community Health and DevelopmentHealth Policy Implementation SciencePublic Health Policies and Education

Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy

Shediac-Rizkallah, M. C., Bone, L. R.·1998·Health Education Research

Abstract

Attention to the sustainability of health intervention programs both in the US and abroad is increasing, but little consensus exists on the conceptual and operational definitions of sustainability. Moreover, an empirical knowledge base about the determinants of sustainability is still at an early stage. Planning for sustainability requires, first, a clear understanding of the concept of sustainability and operational indicators that may be used in monitoring sustainability over time. Important categories of indicators include: (1) maintenance of health benefits achieved through an initial program, (2) level of institutionalization of a program within an organization and (3) measures of capacity building in the recipient community. Second, planning for sustainability requires the use of programmatic approaches and strategies that favor long-term program maintenance. We suggest that the potential influences on sustainability may derive from three major groups of factors: (1) project design and implementation factors, (2) factors within the organizational setting, and (3) factors in the broader community environment. Future efforts to develop sustainable health intervention programs in communities can build on the concepts and strategies proposed here.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/13.1.87

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shediac-Rizkallah, M. C., & Bone, L. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Bone, L. R.
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
87-108
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2148850812
Cited by
1,129
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 47
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
sustainability of health programs, community health programs, program planning, sustainability indicators, institutionalization, capacity building, organizational factors, community environment
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Community Participation, Health Plan Implementation, Health Planning, Health Policy, Health Services Research, Humans, Organizational Innovation, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review