Cited by 8Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

Reliability and validation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory

Open access
Omasa, Haruka, Kanzaki, Sho, Takahashi, Mariko, Sato, Hiroaki, Wada, Tetsuro, Kawase, Tetsuaki, Naito, Yasushi, Murakami, Shingo +2 more·2019·AUDIOLOGY JAPAN

Abstract

要旨: 耳鳴苦痛度の質問票である tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) は, 耳鳴治療評価のために行われている検査である。THI 原版は英語であったが, 邦訳版を作成するにあたり, 翻訳・逆翻訳が行われていなかった。今回これらを行った改訂版について信頼性と妥当性の検討を 6 施設の病院で行った。検討は耳鳴患者と耳鳴のない健常者を含む98例を対象として実施された。クロンバッハの係数は0.970であり, 0.8以上であったことから内的整合性は示された。1 回目と7日後に施行された2回目の THI 改訂版の再検査では相関が認められ, 信頼性が確認された。THI 改訂版と同時に実施された THI 旧版, HADS (うつと不安の尺度に関する質問票), SF-36 (包括的 QOL質問票) との相関から妥当性が確認された。ただし, 改訂版における問13と問16のみ再現性が認められず, 質問票として使用するにあたりその旨を付記する必要があると考えられた。

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4295/audiology.62.607

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omasa, H., Kanzaki, S., Takahashi, M., Sato, H., Wada, T., Kawase, T., Naito, Y., Murakami, S., Hara, A., & Ogawa, K.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Nagoya City University (JP)
  • Iwate University (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital (JP)
Venue
AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
Published
2019-12-28
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
607-614
ISSN
  • 0303-8106 (ISSN-L)
  • 1883-7301
OpenAlex
W3004503586
Cited by
8
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
AUDIOLOGY JAPAN (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, tinnitus, Japanese translation, reliability statistics, validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review