Cited by 147Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Identifying Entrustable Professional Activities in Internal Medicine Training

Open access
Hauer, Karen E., Kohlwes, Jeffrey, Cornett, Patricia, Hollander, Harry, ten Cate, Olle, Ranji, Sumant R., Soni, Krishan, Iobst, William +1 more·2013·Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Abstract

Background: Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) can form the foundation of competency-based assessment in medical training, focused on performance of discipline-specific core clinical activities. Objective: To identify EPAs for the Internal Medicine (IM) Educational Milestones to operationalize competency-based assessment of residents using EPAs. Methods: We used a modified Delphi approach to conduct a 2-step cross-sectional survey of IM educators at a 3-hospital IM residency program; residents also completed a survey. Participants rated the importance and appropriate year of training to reach competence for 30 proposed IM EPAs. Content validity indices identified essential EPAs. We conducted independent sample t tests to determine IM educator-resident agreement and calculated effect sizes. Finally, we determined the effect of different physician roles on ratings. Results: Thirty-six IM educators participated; 22 completed both surveys. Twelve residents participated. Seventeen EPAs had a content validity index of 100%; 10 additional EPAs exceeded 80%. Educators and residents rated the importance of 27 of 30 EPAs similarly. Residents felt that 10 EPAs could be met at least 1 year earlier than educators had specified. Conclusions: Internal medicine educators had a stable opinion of EPAs developed through this study, and residents generally agreed. Using this approach, programs could identify EPAs for resident evaluation, building on the initial list created via our study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4300/jgme-d-12-00060.1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 147

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 9 Hicks P. Pediatrics Milestones Project: the approach to and progress in construction of developmentally anchored milestones. J Grad Med Educ . 2010;2(3):410-418.

Authors
Hauer, K. E., Kohlwes, J., Cornett, P., Hollander, H., ten Cate, O., Ranji, S. R., Soni, K., Iobst, W., & O'Sullivan, P.
Venue
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Published
2013-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
54-59
ISSN
  • 1949-8349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-8357
OpenAlex
W2163768756
Cited by
147
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3
FWCI
15.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
entrustable professional activities, internal medicine residency, competency-based assessment, educational milestones, resident evaluation, medical education, content validity, physician role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review