Cited by 39Innovations in Medical EducationMentoring and Academic DevelopmentCoaching Methods and Impact

A Developmental Approach to Internal Medicine Residency Education: Lessons Learned from the Design and Implementation of a Novel Longitudinal Coaching Program

Open access
Gonzalo, Jed D., Wolpaw, Daniel R., Krok, Karen L., Pfeiffer, Michael P., McCall-Hosenfeld, Jennifer S.·2019·Medical Education Online

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resident physicians' achievement of professional competencies requires reflective practice skills and faculty coaching. Graduate medical education programs, however, struggle to operationalize these activities. OBJECTIVE: To (1) describe the process and strategies for implementing an Internal Medicine (IM) resident coaching program that evolved in response to challenges, (2) characterize residents' professional learning plans (PLPs) and their alignment with EPAs, and, (3) examine key lessons learned. DESIGN: The program began in 2013 and involved all postgraduate years (PGY) residents (n = 60, 100%), and 20 faculty coaches who were all IM trained and practicing in an IM-related specialty. One coach was linked with 3-4 residents for three years. Through 1:1 meetings, resident-coach pairs identified professional challenges ('disorienting dilemmas' or 'worst days'), reviewed successes ('best days'), and co-created professional learning plans. Typed summaries were requested following meetings. Coaches met monthly for professional development and to discuss program challenges/successes, which informed programmatic improvements; additionally, a survey was distributed after three program years. Data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methodologies. RESULTS: Disorienting dilemmas and professional learning plans mapped to all 16 EPAs and four additional themes: work-life balance, career planning, teaching skills, and research/scholarship. The most-frequently mapped topics included: PGY1 - leading and working within interprofessional care teams (EPA 10), research and scholarship, and work-life balance; PGY2 - improving quality of care (EPA 13), demonstrating personal habits of lifelong learning (EPA15), and research and scholarship; PGY3 - lifelong learning (EPA15); career planning was common across all years. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned included challenges in coordination of observations, identifying disorienting dilemmas, and creating a shared mental model between residents, faculty, and program leadership. The coaching program resulted in professional learning plans aligned with IM EPAs, in addition to other professional development topics. Operationalization of aspects of these results can inform the development of similar programs in residency education.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper describes the design, implementation, and iterative modification of a longitudinal coaching program for Internal Medicine residents at Penn State College of Medicine, pairing all 60 categorical residents with 20 faculty coaches. Residents’ professional learning plans mapped to all 16 Internal Medicine EPAs plus four additional themes, while key lessons concerned direct observation, identifying disorienting dilemmas, and creating a shared mental model among stakeholders.

Key findings

  • From 119 resident–coach meeting summaries submitted by 65 unique residents (81%), 323 disorienting dilemmas/professional learning plans mapped to all 16 EPAs and four additional themes: work–life balance, career planning, teaching skills, and research/scholarship.
  • Most frequently discussed topics varied by year: PGY1 — EPA10 leading/working within interprofessional teams (18/108, 17%), work–life balance (17/52, 33%), career planning (16/52, 31%), research/scholarship (15/52, 29%); PGY2 — EPA15 lifelong learning (19/90, 21%), EPA13 improving quality of care (15/90, 17%), career planning (15/38, 40%), research/scholarship (14/38, 37%); PGY3 — EPA15 (11/21, 52%) and career planning (8/14, 57%).
  • After three years, surveys were completed by 14/60 residents (24%) and 12/20 faculty (60%); key lessons included challenges coordinating authentic direct observations, difficulty identifying disorienting dilemmas, and the need for a shared mental model among residents, coaches, and program leadership.
  • The program was modified after six months to rely less on direct observation and more on residents’ self-assessment, rotation evaluations, and facilitated reflection/goal-setting.

Methods

  • Single-center implementation at Penn State College of Medicine’s Internal Medicine residency beginning in 2013; all categorical residents (n = 60) were matched with 20 faculty coaches, each coaching 3–4 residents across PGY1–3, with 5% effort support per coach.
  • Resident–coach pairs met approximately every 6–8 weeks, used “disorienting dilemmas” and “best/worst days” to co-create professional learning plans, and submitted typed summaries; coaches met monthly for faculty development and program improvement, and an anonymous electronic survey was sent after year three.
  • Hybrid qualitative analysis: deductive thematic analysis for the 16 EPAs plus inductive identification of emergent themes; two investigators independently coded all email summaries, resolved discrepancies, and examined frequencies. Survey responses were analyzed by two investigators.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: submitted meeting summaries were low, conservatively estimated to capture at least 14% of resident–coach interactions; meetings occurred less often than the ideal of approximately seven per year; residents did not always initiate summaries; the program was single-center; 5% FTE support may not be replicable; and the paper describes implementation features without reporting impact on resident behaviors or practice.
  • Evident from the text: there was no comparison or control group, survey response rates were low for residents (24%), and the reduced focus on direct observation limited the coach’s ability to assess entrustment.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10872981.2019.1591256

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 45 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    For PGY2, the most frequently mapped topics included improving quality of care (EPA 13), demonstrating personal habits of lifelong learning (EPA15), and research and scholarship.

    “The most-frequently mapped topics included: PGY1 – leading and working within interprofessional care teams (EPA 10), research and scholarship, and work–life balance; PGY2 – improving quality of care (EPA 13), demonstrating personal habits of lifelong learning (EPA15), and research and scholarship; PGY3 – lifelong learning (EPA15); career planning was common across all years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The submitted meeting summaries are representative of the disorienting dilemmas and PLPs discussed in all resident–coach meetings.
  • Findingown data

    For PGY3, the most frequently mapped topic was lifelong learning (EPA15).

    “The most-frequently mapped topics included: PGY1 – leading and working within interprofessional care teams (EPA 10), research and scholarship, and work–life balance; PGY2 – improving quality of care (EPA 13), demonstrating personal habits of lifelong learning (EPA15), and research and scholarship; PGY3 – lifelong learning (EPA15); career planning was common across all years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The submitted meeting summaries are representative of the disorienting dilemmas and PLPs discussed in all resident–coach meetings.
  • Findingown data

    Sixty-five unique residents (81%) submitted at least one summary containing a disorienting dilemma and/or PLP during the review.

    “Sixty-five unique residents (81%) submitted at least one summary containing a disorienting dilemma and/or PLP during our review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Resident-coach discussions were dynamic and changed throughout the course of residents' training.

    “Resident–coach discussions were dynamic and changed throughout the course of residents’ training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Career planning was a common topic across all postgraduate years.

    “The most-frequently mapped topics included: PGY1 – leading and working within interprofessional care teams (EPA 10), research and scholarship, and work–life balance; PGY2 – improving quality of care (EPA 13), demonstrating personal habits of lifelong learning (EPA15), and research and scholarship; PGY3 – lifelong learning (EPA15); career planning was common across all years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The submitted meeting summaries are representative of the disorienting dilemmas and PLPs discussed in all resident–coach meetings.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    A total of 119 resident-coach meeting summaries were examined.

    “To characterize the disorienting dilemmas and PLPs, we initially examined data from submitted meeting summaries, which included a total of 119 resident–coach meeting summaries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PGY1 meeting summaries numbered 51, with 160 coding references.

    “The frequencies by year included: PGY1 = 51 meeting summaries (160 coding references); PGY2 = 48 summaries (128 coding references); PGY3 = 20 summaries (35 coding references).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PGY2 meeting summaries numbered 48, with 128 coding references.

    “The frequencies by year included: PGY1 = 51 meeting summaries (160 coding references); PGY2 = 48 summaries (128 coding references); PGY3 = 20 summaries (35 coding references).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PGY3 meeting summaries numbered 20, with 35 coding references.

    “The frequencies by year included: PGY1 = 51 meeting summaries (160 coding references); PGY2 = 48 summaries (128 coding references); PGY3 = 20 summaries (35 coding references).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During PGY1, the most-commonly discussed dilemmas/PLPs aligned with leading and working within interprofessional health-care teams (EPA10), research/scholarship (Theme 4), career planning (Theme 2), and work-life balance (Theme 1).

    “During PGY1, most-commonly discussed dilemmas/PLPs aligned with leading and working within interprofessional health-care teams (EPA10), research/scholarship (Theme 4), career planning (Theme 2), and work–life balance (Theme 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Disorienting dilemmas and professional learning plans mapped to all 16 EPAs and four additional themes: work-life balance, career planning, teaching skills, and research/scholarship.

    “Disorienting dilemmas and professional learning plans mapped to all 16 EPAs and four additional themes: work–life balance, career planning, teaching skills, and research/scholarship.”
    • Also stated in: § Disorientating dilemmas, professional learning plans, EPAs · plain
      “We identified a total of 323 disorienting dilemmas with PLPs mapped across all 16 EPAs, and four additional themes: (1) work–life balance, (2) career planning, (3) teaching skills, and, (4) research/scholarship [28,29].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The submitted meeting summaries are representative of the disorienting dilemmas and PLPs discussed in all resident–coach meetings.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Lessons learned included challenges in coordination of observations, identifying disorienting dilemmas, and creating a shared mental model between residents, faculty, and program leadership.

    “Lessons learned included challenges in coordination of observations, identifying disorienting dilemmas, and creating a shared mental model between residents, faculty, and program leadership.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Informal feedback from the coaches suggests that the data capture a larger proportion of the meetings that took place.

    “However, informal feedback from the coaches suggests that our data capture a larger proportion of the meetings that took place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Direct observations by coaches were challenging to coordinate and infrequently occurred.

    “Our initial plan was to ground relationships in observations performed by coaches, allowing for feedback and subsequent reflection-on-practice[30]. However, this model met significant challenges in the early months. Coaches struggled to find mutually available times for observation, and as a result, infrequently observed residents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During PGY2, the most-commonly discussed dilemmas/PLPs aligned with improving quality of care (EPA13), demonstrating personal habits of lifelong learning (EPA15), research/scholarship (Theme 4), and career planning (Theme 2).

    “During PGY2, most-commonly discussed dilemmas/PLPs aligned with improving quality of care (EPA13), demonstrating personal habits of lifelong learning (EPA15), research/scholarship (Theme 4), and career planning (Theme 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The relationship with program leadership has become increasingly beneficial in both directions, with opportunities for resident advocacy by coaches, and coaching interventions based on CCC feedback to resident-coach pairs.

    “The relationship with program leadership has become increasingly beneficial in both directions, with opportunities for resident advocacy by coaches, and coaching interventions based on CCC feedback to resident–coach pairs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In our experience, residents variably possess self-directed learning, self-reflection, and self-assessment skills, and this was manifest in residents' struggles to identify disorienting dilemmas.

    “In our experience, residents variably possess these skills, and this was manifest in residents’ struggles to identify disorienting dilemmas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Despite significant investment, the program struggled to pragmatically ensure all three components of entrustment - direct observation, feedback, and reflective practice - were fully integrated into the coaching program, with direct observation posing a unique logistic challenge.

    “Despite significant investment, we struggled to pragmatically ensure all three components of entrustment – direct observation, feedback, and reflective practice – were fully integrated into the coaching program, with direct observation posing a unique logistic challenge [3,50].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The program had 5% departmental FTE support for coaches, which is a substantial input of resources that may not be replicable at other institutions.

    “We had 5% departmental FTE support for coaches, which is a substantial input of resources that may not be replicable at other institutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    These activities are best achieved through longitudinal relationships with faculty who assimilate various sources of information and provide customized appraisal and feedback.

    “Collectively, these activities are best achieved through longitudinal relationships with faculty who assimilate various sources of information (e.g., direct observation, multisource feedback) and provide customized appraisal and feedback, facilitating an exploration to identify improvement areas [13–20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [14] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The two investigators then independently coded the remaining data and resolved all coding discrepancies through discussion and arbitration.

    “The two investigators then independently coded the remaining data, met again to resolve all coding discrepancies through discussion and arbitration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Survey responses were analyzed by two investigators, and all investigators agreed upon results.

    “Survey responses were analyzed by two investigators (J.S.M-H., D.R.W.), and all investigators agreed upon results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    After coding half the data, the two investigators jointly identified and agreed on additional themes and refined their coding scheme for the EPAs.

    “After coding half the data, the two investigators came together to jointly identify and agree on additional themes, as well as refine their coding scheme for the EPAs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Graduate medical education programs struggle to operationalize these activities and frequently lack sufficient infrastructure to support longitudinal relationships between trainees and faculty.

    “However, graduate medical education (GME) programs struggle to operationalize these activities, and frequently lack sufficient infrastructure to support longitudinal relationships between trainees and faculty [13,22,23].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    To achieve CBME outcomes, residents must develop deliberate reflective practice skills, which are necessary for critical thinking, professionalism, and continuous professional development.

    “To achieve CBME outcomes, residents must develop deliberate reflective practice skills, which are necessary for critical thinking, professionalism, and continuous professional development [5–8].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Two investigators independently analyzed all email summaries, each coding half of the data.

    “Two investigators (J.S.M-H., K.L.K.) independently analyzed all email summaries [38,39].”
    • Also stated in: § Coaching program · plain
      “Each investigator independently coded half of data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [38] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [39] Boyatzis RE, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The coaching program resulted in professional learning plans aligned with IM EPAs, in addition to other professional development topics.

    “The coaching program resulted in professional learning plans aligned with IM EPAs, in addition to other professional development topics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The submitted meeting summaries are representative of the disorienting dilemmas and PLPs discussed in all resident–coach meetings.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Even lacking direct observation, the focus on EPAs brought these competencies to the forefront of residents' minds, which is reflected in the frequencies of EPAs discussed in resident-coach meetings.

    “Even lacking direct observation, we suspect this focus on EPAs brought these competencies to the forefront of residents’ minds, which is reflected in the frequencies of EPAs discussed in resident–coach meetings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The focus on EPAs in the resident-coach interaction likely increased residents' attention to these learning areas.

    “Nevertheless, it is important to note that our focus on EPAs in the resident–coach interaction likely increased residents’ attention to these learning areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This requires significant changes, such as designing GME programs that link residents with faculty over longer time periods, faculty development in coaching skills, reconsidering clinical faculty roles, and examining the balance between clinical service and education requirements.

    “This requires significant changes, such as designing GME programs that link residents with faculty over longer time periods, faculty development in coaching skills, reconsidering clinical faculty roles, and examining the balance between clinical service and education requirements [13,46,52].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [52] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Clinical productivity pressures increasingly push faculty to meet revenue benchmarks, which can be at odds with authentic coaching of residents in CBME frameworks.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Residents must possess self-directed learning, self-reflection, and self-assessment skills, which is lacking in some trainees.

    “Residents, therefore, must possess self-directed learning, self-reflection, and self-assessment skills, which is lacking in some trainees [9,41,42].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [42] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The transition from less granular, 'time-based' assessments to CBME and entrustment requires more direct workplace-based observations of trainees, provision of high-quality feedback, and use of highly reliable assessment tools, all of which require transformation in processes, resources, and faculty expectations.

    “The transition from less granular, ‘time-based’ assessments to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) and entrustment requires more direct workplace-based observations of trainees, provision of high-quality feedback, and use of highly reliable assessment tools, all of which require transformation in processes, resources, and faculty expectations [13,46–48].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [47] Holmboe ES, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] Chopra V, Arora VM, Saint S. Will You Be My Mentor?—Four Archetypes to Help Mentees Succeed in Academic Medicine. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(2):175–176. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    There is a pressing need to transform clinical learning environments at the systems level to allow for longitudinal faculty coaching to meet these needs.

    “Regardless, there is a pressing need to transform clinical learning environments at the systems level to allow for longitudinal faculty coaching to meet these needs[51].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Clinical productivity pressures increasingly push faculty to meet revenue benchmarks, which can be at odds with authentic coaching of residents in CBME frameworks.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Meetings were challenging to schedule, thus occurring less frequently than the 'ideal' of approximately seven/year.

    “Meetings were challenging to schedule (thus occurring less frequently than the ‘ideal’ of approximately seven/year).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The shift away from EPAs may have been due to lack of direct observation opportunities, a culture less accustomed to coaching behaviors, and/or a previously undiscovered need for residents to have an outlet for non-threatening conversations about work-life balance, wellness, and career development.

    “This shift away from EPAs may have been due to lack of direct observation opportunities, a culture less accustomed to coaching behaviors, and/or a previously undiscovered need for residents to have an outlet for non-threatening conversations about work–life balance, wellness, and career development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The modifications to address challenges in identifying disorienting dilemmas allowed for less-scripted, open-ended dialogue between resident and coach, challenged residents to identify PLPs, and created greater accountability for follow-up with the coach.

    “This allowed for less-scripted, open-ended dialogue between resident and coach, challenged residents to identify PLPs, and created greater accountability for follow-up with the coach.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The single-center implementation suggests modifications would be required for use in other settings.

    “An additional limitation to consider is that the single-center implementation suggests modifications would be required for use in other settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A shared mental model for the coaching role must exist amongst all stakeholders.

    “A shared mental model for coaching role must exist amongst all stakeholders”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The paper describes implementation features and does not report the impact on residents' behaviors or practice.

    “Lastly, we describe implementation features and do not report the impact on residents’ behaviors or practice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The change to focus less on direct observation limited the coach's opportunities to assess whether a learner could be entrusted, thereby diminishing one of the key goals of the program.

    “However, this change limited the coach’s opportunities to assess whether a learner could be entrusted, thereby diminishing one of the key goals of the program.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Compared to 'time-in-seat' education, CBME requires collaboration between resident and coach, with responsibility on the learner to be active in reflecting, assessing, and developing PLPs.

    “Compared to ‘time-in-seat’ education, CBME requires collaboration between resident and coach, with responsibility on the learner to be active in reflecting, assessing, and developing PLPs[9].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

36 of 36
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The submitted meeting summaries are representative of the disorienting dilemmas and PLPs discussed in all resident–coach meetings.

    “Sixty-five unique residents (81%) submitted at least one summary containing a disorienting dilemma and/or PLP during our review.”
    “we initially examined data from submitted meeting summaries, which included a total of 119 resident–coach meeting summaries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The lessons learned from this single-institution coaching program are transferable to other residency programs.

    “Operationalization of aspects of these results can inform the development of similar programs in residency education.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Residents' self-identified disorienting dilemmas and professional learning plans reflect their actual professional learning needs.

    “Prior to meetings, residents were asked to reflect on their clinical rotations and self-identify improvement areas.”
    “The expected outcome of each meeting was a PLP that was focused on an EPA (if applicable), or other area of learning need as articulated by the resident.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of coaching by ward attendings and clinic preceptors.

    “However, we designed this program based on the perceived lack of ‘coaching’ by ward attendings and clinic preceptors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a need to enhance longitudinal relationships between residents and faculty.

    “In response to our need to enhance longitudinal relationships between residents and faculty, we implemented a coaching program that supports residents’ professional development.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinical productivity pressures increasingly push faculty to meet revenue benchmarks, which can be at odds with authentic coaching of residents in CBME frameworks.

    “With clinical productivity pressures, faculty are increasingly being pushed to meet revenue benchmarks, which can be at odds with authentic coaching of residents in CBME frameworks.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • PGY1 EPA2 percentage does not match its count

    Minor

    Table 2 reports 7 of 108 PGY1 EPA references as 7%; the percentage is 6.48%, which rounds to 6% at the displayed precision.

    Reported 7 · recomputed 6.481481

  • Resident survey response rate is overstated

    Minor

    Fourteen of 60 invited residents completed the survey, a response rate of 23.3%, which rounds to 23%, not 24%.

    Reported 24 · recomputed 23.333333

  • PGY1 EPA11 percentage does not match its count

    Minor

    Table 2 likewise reports 7 of 108 PGY1 EPA references as 7%, rather than 6% when rounded to a whole percent.

    Reported 7 · recomputed 6.481481

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonzalo, J. D., Wolpaw, D. R., Krok, K. L., Pfeiffer, M. P., & McCall-Hosenfeld, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
Corresponding author
Gonzalo, Jed D.
Venue
Medical Education Online
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1591256
ISSN
1087-2981 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2925889027
Cited by
39
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Education Online (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • American Medical Association
  • Penn State Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
Keywords
internal medicine residency, faculty coaching, basic competencies, reflective practice, disorienting dilemma, professional development, work-life balance, career planning, lifelong learning, interprofessional care teams, program implementation
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Clinical Competence, Humans, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Leadership, Surveys and Questionnaires, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review