Program Director Perceptions of Proficiency in the Core Entrustable Professional Activities
Open accessAbstract
Background: The Association of American Medical Colleges describes 13 core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) that every graduating medical student should be expected to perform proficiently on day 1 of residency, regardless of chosen specialty. Studies have shown wide variability in program director (PD) confidence in interns' abilities to perform these core EPAs. Little is known regarding comparison of United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores with proficiency in EPAs. Objective: We determined if PDs from a large health system felt confident in their postgraduate year 1 residents' abilities to perform the 13 core EPAs, and compared perceived EPA proficiency with USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores. Methods: The PDs were asked to rate their residents' proficiency in each EPA and to provide residents' USMLE scores. Timing coincided with the reporting period for resident milestones. Results: Surveys were completed on 204 of 328 residents (62%). PDs reported that 69% of residents (140 of 204) were prepared for EPA 4 (orders/prescriptions), 61% (117 of 192) for EPA 7 (form clinical questions), 68% (135 of 198) for EPA 8 (handovers), 63% (116 of 185) for EPA 11 (consent), and 38% (49 of 129) for EPA 13 (patient safety). EPA ratings and USMLE 1 and 2 were negatively correlated (r(101) = −0.23, P = .031). Conclusions: PDs felt that a significant percentage of residents were not adequately prepared in order writing, forming clinical questions, handoffs, informed consent, and promoting a culture of patient safety. We found no positive association between USMLE scores and EPA ratings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most surveyed residency program directors expressed confidence that incoming residents could safely perform Core of the Core skills.
“Notably, most surveyed residency program directors expressed confidence that incoming residents could safely perform these skills [18].”
From Reimagining Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Undergraduate Medical Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
AI cannot supplant the humanistic side of medicine.
“emphasizing the humanistic side of medicine that AI cannot supplant [18].”
From Reimagining Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Undergraduate Medical Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
The Association of American Medical Colleges
ZAPFFE, F. C. (1938) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-193801000-00007 · Cited by 5,527 · see citing works
Entrustability of professional activities and competency‐based training
ten Cate, O. (2005) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x · Cited by 1,238 · see citing works
ten Cate, O., & Scheele, F. (2007) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31805559c7 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Nuts and Bolts of Entrustable Professional Activities
ten Cate, O. (2013) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-12-00380.1 · Cited by 1,018 · see citing works
Lindeman, B. M., Sacks, B. C., & Lipsett, P. A. (2015) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.005 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Revisiting the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency
Amiel, J. M., Andriole, D. A., Biskobing, D. M., Brown, D. R., Cutrer, W. B., Emery, M. T., Mejicano, G. C., Ryan, M. S., Swails, J. L., & Wagner, D. P. (2021) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000004088 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Welcher, C. M., Hersh, W., Takesue, B., Stagg Elliott, V., & Hawkins, R. E. (2018) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001829 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Pereira, A. G., Harrell, H. E., Weissman, A., Smith, C. D., Dupras, D. M., & Kane, G. C. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001134 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jacobs, S. M., Lundy, N. N., Issenberg, S. B., & Chandran, L. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/50903 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pearlman, R. E., Pawelczak, M., Yacht, A. C., Akbar, S., & Farina, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Northwell Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Farina, Gino A.
- Venue
- Journal of Graduate Medical Education
- Published
- 2017-10-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 588-592
- ISSN
- 1949-8349 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-8357
- PMC
- PMC5646915
- OpenAlex
- W2746129468
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of Graduate Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Keywords
- program director perceptions, USMLE Step 1 scores, postgraduate year 1 residents, handover, informed consent, patient safety, graduate medical education
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Internship and Residency, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review