Gender Representation in Current EFL Textbooks in Iranian Secondary Schools
Abstract
Abstract—This study investigates gender representation in current EFL textbooks (Right Path to English I and II) that are designed locally and taught as an obligatory subject in Iranian secondary schools. Two methods of analysis were performed. First, these textbooks were subjected to a systematic quantitative analysis with reference to: (1) gender visibility in both text and illustrations and (2) female/male-oriented topic presentation in dialogues and reading passages. Second, a qualitative analysis was undertaken by concentrating on four components of gender-role modelling: (1) male-centred language including: (a) firstness and (b) masculine generic construction; (2) gender-linked occupation possibilities; (3) distribution of household responsibilities, and (4) distribution of spare time and leisure activities. The findings revealed the degree of imbalance in gender representation in these textbooks. The paper concludes by addressing the implications of gender imbalance depicted in the textbooks for learners ’ perceptions. Index Terms—ELT curriculum, gender representation, sexism, stereotyped gender roles, occupational roles, visibility in text I.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies used secondary level textbooks for analyzing gender stereotypes.
“First, some studies used secondary level textbooks for analyzing gender stereotypes [60,61,63,64,70–72,78,80,82,98,99].”
From Gender stereotypes and education: A comparative content analysis of Malaysian, Indonesian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi school textbooks (2018) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
Hellinger, M. (1980) · Women s Studies International Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0148-0685(80)92323-4 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- [1] Ansary, H. & E. Babaii (2003). Subliminal Sexism in Current ESL/EFL Textbooks. Asian EFL Journal 5, 200-241.
- [3] Birjandi, P. & A. Soheili (2012). Right Path to English I and II. Iran, Tehran: Ministry of Education, Center for the Publication of University Textbooks.
- [4] Borjian, M. (2013). English in Post-Revolutionary Iran: From Indigenization to Internationalization. Bristol, Buffalo and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
- [5] Britton, G. & M. Lumpkin (1977). For Sale: Subliminal Bias in Textbooks. The Reading Teacher 31.1, 40-45.
- [6] Cameron, D. (1985). Feminism and Linguistic Theory. Great Britain: The Macmillan Press Ltd. · DOI
- 10.1177/0042085977121003 · DOI
- [8] Graham, A. (1975). The Making of a Non-Sexist Dictionary. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 57-63.
- [9] Hamdan, S. (2010). English-language Textbooks Reflect Gender Bias: A Case Study in Jordan. Advances in Gender and Education 2, 22-26.
- 10.2307/3586137 · DOI
- 10.1086/446147 · DOI
- [13] Key, M. R. (1975). Male/Female Language. Metuchen, NJ.: The Scarecrow Press.
- [14] Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women's Place. New York: Harper and Row.
- [16] Mills, S. & L. Mullany (2011). Language, Gender and Feminism: Theory, Methodology and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. · DOI
- 10.1080/07908310408666689 · DOI
- [19] Nilsen, A. (1977). Sexism in Children's Books and Elementary Classroom Materials. In A. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H. Gershuny & J. Stanley (eds.), Sexism and Language. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English, 161-179.
- 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00237.x · DOI
- 10.2307/3586584 · DOI
- 10.1080/09571739785200141 · DOI
- [24] Sleeter, C. & C. Grant (1991). Race, Class, Gender and Disability in Current Textbooks. In M. W. Apple, & L. K. Christian-Smith (eds.), The Politics of the Textbook. London, UK: Routledge, 78-110.
- [26] Thorne, B. & N. Henely (eds.) (1975). Language and Sex: Differences and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, K. M. M., & Asadullah, M. N. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190807 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hall, M.
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Mahnaz
- ORCID
- Hall, Mahnaz
- Venue
- Journal of Language Teaching and Research
- Publisher
- Academy Publication
- Published
- 2014-03-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1798-4769 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162650380
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Language Teaching and Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- gender representation, EFL textbooks, gender stereotypes, firstness, household responsibilities, leisure, job roles, textbook illustrations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review