Cited by 104Gender Studies in LanguageGender, Sexuality, and EducationGender and Feminist Studies

‘For men must work, and women must weep’: Sexism in english language textbooks used in German schools

Hellinger, Marlis·1980·Women s Studies International Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0148-0685(80)92323-4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hellinger, M.
Affiliations
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Hellinger, Marlis
Venue
Women s Studies International Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-01
Volume
3
Issue
2-3
Pages
267-275
ISSN
0148-0685 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006072499
Cited by
104
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Women s Studies International Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
sexism, sexist language, English textbooks, gender and language, patriarchy, gender equality, women's rights, German schools, textbook content analysis, language textbooks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review