Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Korean Version of Mini Mental Status Examination for Dementia Screening and Its' Short Form

Open access
Kim, Tae Hui, Jhoo, Jin Hyeong, Park, Joon Hyuk, Kim, Jeong Lan, Ryu, Seung Ho, Moon, Seok Woo, Choo, Il Han, Lee, Dong Woo, Yoon, Jong Chul, Do, Yeon Ja, Lee, Seok Bum, Kim, Moon Doo, Kim, Ki Woong·2010·Psychiatry Investigation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We developed a Korean version of Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) optimized for screening dementia (MMSE-DS) and its' short form (SMMSE-DS). METHODS: We constructed the MMSE-DS using the items of the two current Korean versions of MMSE and then construct the SMMSE-DS consisted of 13 items from the MMSE-DS based on the diagnostic accuracy of individual items for dementia. We investigated reliability and validity of MMSE-DS and SMMSE-DS on 1,555 subjects (1,222 nondemented controls, 333 dementia patients). We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the SMMSE-DS with that of the three full Korean versions of MMSE, and examined its' age- and education-specific optimal cutoff scores for dementia. RESULTS: The internal consistency obtained by Cronbach's coefficient alpha was 0.826. The inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.968 (p<0.001) and 0.825 (p<0.001), respectively. It showed significant correlation with the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) (r=-0.698, p<0.05) and the three full Korean versions of MMSE (r=0.839-0.938, p<0.001). The area under the receiver operator curve for dementia of the SMMSE-DS was larger than those of the three full Korean versions of MMSE (p<0.001). Age, education and gender explained 19.4% of the total variance of SMMSE-DS scores. The optimal cutoff scores for dementia of the SMMSE-DS were estimated differently by age and educational attainment of the subjects. CONCLUSION: The SMMSE-DS was found to be accurate, brief and portable instrument for screening dementia in Korean elders, and may be particularly useful for screening dementia in elderly populations with wide variation in educational levels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.102This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Kim, T. H., Jhoo, J. H., Park, J. H., Kim, J. L., Ryu, S. H., Moon, S. W., Choo, I. H., Lee, D. W., Yoon, J. C., Do, Y. J., Lee, S. B., Kim, M. D., & Kim, K. W.
Venue
Psychiatry Investigation
Published
2010
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
102
ISSN
1738-3684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099442862
Cited by
270
References
3
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Korean Version of Mini Mental Status Examination for Dementia Screening and Its' Short Form. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.102
The paper
Kim, T. H., Jhoo, J. H., Park, J. H., Kim, J. L., Ryu, S. H., Moon, S. W., Choo, I. H., Lee, D. W., Yoon, J. C., Do, Y. J., Lee, S. B., Kim, M. D., & Kim, K. W. (2010). Korean Version of Mini Mental Status Examination for Dementia Screening and Its' Short Form. Psychiatry Investigation. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.